The Single Biggest Weakness of the Constitution:

[Freiheit]

Every country has elements of socialism

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

There is no transitional about it, communism has never been put in without a huge revolution very violent. And it doesn't work. I believe socialism has always been Democratic at least in some sense. When people found out the USSR was in no way democratic, it was no longer the definition of socialist, except in Cold War rightwing dupe worlds. Especially by now for crying out loud. The Finland prime minister said we are all socialists now when the USA passed Healthcare finally for God sake. Thanks GOP and silly dupes.... And yes I have a masters in history and no, liberal fascism is ridiculous drivel.

You should demand a refund of the cost of your college/university degrees. Words have meaning. Political systems are defined. Socialism in its' most extreme sense has everything owned by the collective or government. Socialism is not government using resources to "help" the populace. That is charity or welfare. The Finnish Prime Minister is wrong and if you believe him you are wrong as well. Socialism is defined as collective or government ownership of the means of production and distribution and by inference the complete collective/government control of the economy. If you drill down you discover the fruits of your labor are not yours but belong to the collective/government/

That's communism the pure form of socialism. Your definition is lacking... It always says owned by or regulated by the community... Your definition is right wing propaganda, super dupe. Or link to it.
.

I seriously doubt you have any education beyond grammer school. Take a look at Merriam Webster dictionary definition and go back to your ignorance.

 

[Freiheit]

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

It is neither charity nor welfare it is building a stronger society

That is among the most foolish answers I have seen. Government charity has divided this society not strengthened it.

Government should help people needing help
Billionaires don't need help

Why should anyone be forced at the point of a gun or imprisonment to contribute to a charity they do not agree with?

 

[francoHFW]

When you say communist you say you are a brainwashed functional GOP moron... Nobody is for communism.

Karl Marx (the father of communism) used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably. The anti socialists are on to something.

Every country has elements of socialism

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

Socialism always includes a welfare system. Socialism Now everywhere but GOP dupe world is always democratic well regulated capitalism with a good safety net and perhaps one or two nationalizations like energy or Healthcare... Or the dictionary definition of socialism is a society where all industry and business is owned by or regulated by the government. Now one is communism and one is socialism.the definition has changed since when it was like the USSR until people found out there was no democracy of any kind there.

 

[rightwinger]

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

It is neither charity nor welfare it is building a stronger society

That is among the most foolish answers I have seen. Government charity has divided this society not strengthened it.

Government should help people needing help
Billionaires don't need help

Why should anyone be forced at the point of a gun or imprisonment to contribute to a charity they do not agree with?

I have never had a gun pointed at me
Have you?

 

[rightwinger]

I didn't agree with the invasion of Iraq yet I had to pay for it

 

[Freiheit]

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

It is neither charity nor welfare it is building a stronger society

That is among the most foolish answers I have seen. Government charity has divided this society not strengthened it.

Government should help people needing help
Billionaires don't need help

Why should anyone be forced at the point of a gun or imprisonment to contribute to a charity they do not agree with?

I have never had a gun pointed at me
Have you?

Stop paying your taxes and men with guns will come to acquaint you with the law. Stop paying your property tax and men with guns will come to forcefully and violently remove you from what was your property and oversee its' sale. Stop asking idiotic questions.

 

[anynameyouwish]

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

It is neither charity nor welfare it is building a stronger society

That is among the most foolish answers I have seen. Government charity has divided this society not strengthened it.

Government should help people needing help
Billionaires don't need help

People shouldn't need help.
The free market democratic process should provide a minimum wage (at least for anyone over 21 or married with children) consistent with the cost of living.

I have no problem with doctors and lawyers and ceos and mega star football players and musicians getting rich. I just think the lowest paid 40 hour wage worker should earn enough to pay the rent, lights and food. And maybe a little extra for some cheap weekly entertainment.

 

[Freiheit]

I didn't agree with the invasion of Iraq yet I had to pay for it

Niether did I, nor the invasion of North Viet Nam, nor the second invasion of Iraq, nor the Patriot Act I could go on. Yes my taxes helped pay for them that is why I vociferously protest the actions of Bush both, Clinton (I got to visit that vacation paradise Kosovo because Bill got a bj in the oval office, Obama and when Mr. Trump exceeds his authority.

 

[Flash]

Right on. Nobody on welfare should ever be allowed to vote.

 

[Flash]

The real weakness in our Constitution is that the Bill of Rights, while a great idea, is not strong enough to protect our liberty from government oppression and other people using the government for thievery.

 

[JWBooth]

The Single Biggest Weakness of the Constitution:

It's actually conflict of interest for the poor to be voting since they are merely voting for money (democracy as theft) in their pockets rather than for the commonweal. This points to what turns out to be the biggest weakness of the Constitution. It has no conceptual arguments. It should say, for example, you have to be 35 years old to be president and to vote to insure you have enough wisdom and experience. Similarly, the 10th Amendment should clearly say liberal central govt is illegal in America because monopolistic liberal central govt has been the source of evil in human history. Without conceptual arguments the Constitution has little meaning.Liberals can turn it into a living communist Constitution. If the concept of the 10th Amendment had been as clear as the percept of the Second Amendment America would be sitting pretty today instead of staring down the barrel of Sanders, Warren, Waters, Booker, Ocasio-Cortez communist gun.

“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.” Lysander Spooner

 

[francoHFW]

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

There is no transitional about it, communism has never been put in without a huge revolution very violent. And it doesn't work. I believe socialism has always been Democratic at least in some sense. When people found out the USSR was in no way democratic, it was no longer the definition of socialist, except in Cold War rightwing dupe worlds. Especially by now for crying out loud. The Finland prime minister said we are all socialists now when the USA passed Healthcare finally for God sake. Thanks GOP and silly dupes.... And yes I have a masters in history and no, liberal fascism is ridiculous drivel.

You should demand a refund of the cost of your college/university degrees. Words have meaning. Political systems are defined. Socialism in its' most extreme sense has everything owned by the collective or government. Socialism is not government using resources to "help" the populace. That is charity or welfare. The Finnish Prime Minister is wrong and if you believe him you are wrong as well. Socialism is defined as collective or government ownership of the means of production and distribution and by inference the complete collective/government control of the economy. If you drill down you discover the fruits of your labor are not yours but belong to the collective/government/

That's communism the pure form of socialism. Your definition is lacking... It always says owned by or regulated by the community... Your definition is right wing propaganda, super dupe. Or link to it.
.

I seriously doubt you have any education beyond grammer school. Take a look at Merriam Webster dictionary definition and go back to your ignorance.

No you are a lying a******* LOL and I have a masters in history speak French and Spanish and the rest of the world thinks you are an idiot.the definitions also says control which is another word for regulate. Only your tiny bubble of ignorance GOP propaganda machine in the whole world believes as you do, dumbass dingbat. Read something for God sake Wikipedia history of socialism. His fine

social system or theory in which the government owns and controls themeans of production (as factories) and distribution of goods. More fromMerriam-Webster on socialism.
that definition is dumb it should say or controls doesn't make any sense to own and control... stupid.

 

[francoHFW]

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

There is no transitional about it, communism has never been put in without a huge revolution very violent. And it doesn't work. I believe socialism has always been Democratic at least in some sense. When people found out the USSR was in no way democratic, it was no longer the definition of socialist, except in Cold War rightwing dupe worlds. Especially by now for crying out loud. The Finland prime minister said we are all socialists now when the USA passed Healthcare finally for God sake. Thanks GOP and silly dupes.... And yes I have a masters in history and no, liberal fascism is ridiculous drivel.

You should demand a refund of the cost of your college/university degrees. Words have meaning. Political systems are defined. Socialism in its' most extreme sense has everything owned by the collective or government. Socialism is not government using resources to "help" the populace. That is charity or welfare. The Finnish Prime Minister is wrong and if you believe him you are wrong as well. Socialism is defined as collective or government ownership of the means of production and distribution and by inference the complete collective/government control of the economy. If you drill down you discover the fruits of your labor are not yours but belong to the collective/government/

That's communism the pure form of socialism. Your definition is lacking... It always says owned by or regulated by the community... Your definition is right wing propaganda, super dupe. Or link to it.
.

I seriously doubt you have any education beyond grammer school. Take a look at Merriam Webster dictionary definition and go back to your ignorance.

No you are a lying a******* LOL and I have a masters in history speak French and Spanish and the rest of the world thinks you are an idiot.the definitions also says control which is another word for regulate. Only your tiny bubble of ignorance GOP propaganda machine in the whole world believes as you do, dumbass dingbat. Read something for God sake Wikipedia history of socialism. His fine

social system or theory in which the government owns and controls themeans of production (as factories) and distribution of goods. More fromMerriam-Webster on socialism.
that definition is dumb it should say or controls doesn't make any sense to own and control stupid.

If business or industry is owned by the government it is communism always a dictatorship. If it is controlled by the government is socialism duh.only right wing propaganda is so dumb to say that communism is socialism and socialism is communism and Nazism is communism is socialism. That's what you brainwashed morons believe now.

 

[francoHFW]

The real weakness in our Constitution is that the Bill of Rights, while a great idea, is not strong enough to protect our liberty from government oppression and other people using the government for thievery.

Such as the gop's never ending War on Drugs and abortion choice and ridiculously low-tax rates on the rich?

 

[francoHFW]

The Single Biggest Weakness of the Constitution:

It's actually conflict of interest for the poor to be voting since they are merely voting for money (democracy as theft) in their pockets rather than for the commonweal. This points to what turns out to be the biggest weakness of the Constitution. It has no conceptual arguments. It should say, for example, you have to be 35 years old to be president and to vote to insure you have enough wisdom and experience. Similarly, the 10th Amendment should clearly say liberal central govt is illegal in America because monopolistic liberal central govt has been the source of evil in human history. Without conceptual arguments the Constitution has little meaning.Liberals can turn it into a living communist Constitution. If the concept of the 10th Amendment had been as clear as the percept of the Second Amendment America would be sitting pretty today instead of staring down the barrel of Sanders, Warren, Waters, Booker, Ocasio-Cortez communist gun.

“But whether the Constitution really be one thing, or another, this much is certain - that it has either authorized such a government as we have had, or has been powerless to prevent it. In either case it is unfit to exist.” Lysander Spooner

You and Lysander are under arrest for treason... Turn yourself in

 

[danielpalos]

The Single Biggest Weakness of the Constitution:

It's actually conflict of interest for the poor to be voting since they are merely voting for money (democracy as theft) in their pockets rather than for the commonweal. This points to what turns out to be the biggest weakness of the Constitution. It has no conceptual arguments. It should say, for example, you have to be 35 years old to be president and to vote to insure you have enough wisdom and experience. Similarly, the 10th Amendment should clearly say liberal central govt is illegal in America because monopolistic liberal central govt has been the source of evil in human history. Without conceptual arguments the Constitution has little meaning.Liberals can turn it into a living communist Constitution. If the concept of the 10th Amendment had been as clear as the percept of the Second Amendment America would be sitting pretty today instead of staring down the barrel of Sanders, Warren, Waters, Booker, Ocasio-Cortez communist gun.

When you say communist you say you are a brainwashed functional GOP moron... Nobody is for communism.

Karl Marx (the father of communism) used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably. The anti socialists are on to something.

Every country has elements of socialism

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

nothing but right wing special pleading. the left gets their understanding of socialism from Encyclopedias, not Dictionaries.

 

[Freiheit]

Karl Marx (the father of communism) used the terms socialism and communism interchangeably. The anti socialists are on to something.

Every country has elements of socialism

Be specific remember socialism is: collective or governmental ownership of the means of production and distribution. It is also a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done. Again please be specific as to which countries and element.

Absolutely if you want pure socialism then we or nobody in Europe is socialist

If you want to look at government using resources to help the masses ..... we are all socialist

Government using resources to help the masses is charity or welfare not socialism.
There are many who difer with your "we are all socialists".

Socialism always includes a welfare system. Socialism Now everywhere but GOP dupe world is always democratic well regulated capitalism with a good safety net and perhaps one or two nationalizations like energy or Healthcare... Or the dictionary definition of socialism is a society where all industry and business is owned by or regulated by the government. Now one is communism and one is socialism.the definition has changed since when it was like the USSR until people found out there was no democracy of any kind there.

There is no transitional about it, communism has never been put in without a huge revolution very violent. And it doesn't work. I believe socialism has always been Democratic at least in some sense. When people found out the USSR was in no way democratic, it was no longer the definition of socialist, except in Cold War rightwing dupe worlds. Especially by now for crying out loud. The Finland prime minister said we are all socialists now when the USA passed Healthcare finally for God sake. Thanks GOP and silly dupes.... And yes I have a masters in history and no, liberal fascism is ridiculous drivel.

You should demand a refund of the cost of your college/university degrees. Words have meaning. Political systems are defined. Socialism in its' most extreme sense has everything owned by the collective or government. Socialism is not government using resources to "help" the populace. That is charity or welfare. The Finnish Prime Minister is wrong and if you believe him you are wrong as well. Socialism is defined as collective or government ownership of the means of production and distribution and by inference the complete collective/government control of the economy. If you drill down you discover the fruits of your labor are not yours but belong to the collective/government/

That's communism the pure form of socialism. Your definition is lacking... It always says owned by or regulated by the community... Your definition is right wing propaganda, super dupe. Or link to it.
.

I seriously doubt you have any education beyond grammer school. Take a look at Merriam Webster dictionary definition and go back to your ignorance.

No you are a lying a******* LOL and I have a masters in history speak French and Spanish and the rest of the world thinks you are an idiot.the definitions also says control which is another word for regulate. Only your tiny bubble of ignorance GOP propaganda machine in the whole world believes as you do, dumbass dingbat. Read something for God sake Wikipedia history of socialism. His fine

social system or theory in which the government owns and controls themeans of production (as factories) and distribution of goods. More fromMerriam-Webster on socialism.
that definition is dumb it should say or controls doesn't make any sense to own and control stupid.

If business or industry is owned by the government it is communism always a dictatorship. If it is controlled by the government is socialism duh.only right wing propaganda is so dumb to say that communism is socialism and socialism is communism and Nazism is communism is socialism. That's what you brainwashed morons believe now.

Man you should stop posting your ignorance is overwhelming. Do you have any idea what the above post means? It is so full of false statements it is meanigless. Cool off get as rational as it is possible for you and come at this another time.

 

[rightwinger]

It is neither charity nor welfare it is building a stronger society

That is among the most foolish answers I have seen. Government charity has divided this society not strengthened it.

Government should help people needing help
Billionaires don't need help

Why should anyone be forced at the point of a gun or imprisonment to contribute to a charity they do not agree with?

I have never had a gun pointed at me
Have you?

Stop paying your taxes and men with guns will come to acquaint you with the law. Stop paying your property tax and men with guns will come to forcefully and violently remove you from what was your property and oversee its' sale. Stop asking idiotic questions.

No they won't
They will just seize your income and bank accounts

Seems fair to me

 

[rightwinger]

Right on. Nobody on welfare should ever be allowed to vote.

Neither should the wealthy

 

[rightwinger]

I didn't agree with the invasion of Iraq yet I had to pay for it

Niether did I, nor the invasion of North Viet Nam, nor the second invasion of Iraq, nor the Patriot Act I could go on. Yes my taxes helped pay for them that is why I vociferously protest the actions of Bush both, Clinton (I got to visit that vacation paradise Kosovo because Bill got a bj in the oval office, Obama and when Mr. Trump exceeds his authority.

That is the way things work in a Democracy
You don't always get what you want