The Lemon Test

Reporting on an event is not breaking the law
Lemon was clearly a Reporter and identified himself as such

TRump is acting like a thug again
Then he should have reported from outside. When he entered that church he infringed upon the rights of the parishioners regardless of his intent. You cannot use the 1st to trample on the 1st.
 
Then he should have reported from outside. When he entered that church he infringed upon the rights of the parishioners regardless of his intent. You cannot use the 1st to trample on the 1st.
Lemon trying to make himself a martyr for his leftists buddies which is why he went inside the church instead of remaining outside.
 
"The whole point of it is to disrupt and make people uncomfortable"
- Don Lemon


He also revealed his intent by saying all of the people in that church were "Entitled White Supremacists".

So he meant to disrupt a church service, terrorize its attendees, and to do it because they're white. He should get the book thrown at him.

Just imagine if some Trump supporter group charged into a mosque, saying they had to disrupt them and make them uncomfortable, and then called them a bunch of anti-semetic arab terrorists? Don Lemon would.... cry.
 
I'm not sure it's "fake" exactly, I think these leftards are seriously and truly ignorant and deluded. They actually believe the crap they're spouting.

Politically, one of the surest ways to unite your base is to find a common enemy. OMB. These leftards actually believe Trump is an authoritarian Nazi. And their leaders reinforce that belief and even pay them for it.

Leftism is a menace. It's a very serious social and political threat. Right now we're laughing at these idiots for standing around in the snow, but it only gets worse from here.

The lefties are engaging in the very behavior they claim to hate. "Papers, please". Papers or we beat you up, mob style.
You give them too much credit.

They could care less about the truth. All they want is what they want, at least, at that particular time.

The ends justify the means.

As for the Constitution, they could care less about it either and can't wait to repeal most, if not all of it.

Remember, they hate their own country.
 
Reporting on an event is not breaking the law
Lemon was clearly a Reporter and identified himself as such

TRump is acting like a thug again
The issue was never a First Amendment issue to begin with, at least not to me.

They had no right to waltz in there and interrupt the service because they had a beef with the pastor. In my way of thinking, this violated every principle of accountability, logic and social etiquette.
 
It all started with their "Sanctuary" bs unconstitutional nonsense. The demented LEFT are now emboldened to ignore our Founding Documents because they've been allowed somehow to get away with coddling illegal aliens.
:evil:
 
Reporting on an event is not breaking the law
Lemon was clearly a Reporter and identified himself as such

TRump is acting like a thug again
Reporting on an event is not breaking the law, agreed.

But you can't be part of the Mason family, and go to the Tate House, an video tape the murders and then claim you can't be prosecuted because you are a "reporter"

That's what Lemon is trying to do here.
 
The issue was never a First Amendment issue to begin with, at least not to me.

They had no right to waltz in there and interrupt the service because they had a beef with the pastor. In my way of thinking, this violated every principle of accountability, logic and social etiquette.
Well it DID have to do with the First Amendment, the members of the church First Amendment rights, that's what the FACE Act was passed to protect from people like Lemon and the mob he was with.
 
Well it DID have to do with the First Amendment, the members of the church First Amendment rights, that's what the FACE Act was passed to protect from people like Lemon and the mob he was with.
I guess that's true from that perspective. However, liberals are defending the intrusion as being protected by the 1st Amendment which of course, it is not. That's where I'm coming from.

Even if, for the sake of argument, we say it was a Constitutional right to speak against the pastor's actions, by intruding on the church service they committed the fallacy of determining guilt by (religious) association. To the protestors, the congregants sharing religious ideals with the pastor made them guilty of complicity in his actions as an ICE officer.

There are a million things wrong with this stunt that violated a plethora of basic principles of accountability and committed a whole slew of logical fallacies by the protestors and some here in this discussion trying to rationalize or justify it. One poster here said "A church service was interrupted, it's not the end of the world.". I believe this falls under the fallacy of a false dichotomy. But in any case, no one suggested it was the end of the world and everyone on both sides understands that it wasn't. So it was a stupid thing to say.
 
I guess that's true from that perspective. However, liberals are defending the intrusion as being protected by the 1st Amendment which of course, it is not. That's where I'm coming from.

Even if, for the sake of argument, we say it was a Constitutional right to speak against the pastor's actions, by intruding on the church service they committed the fallacy of determining guilt by (religious) association. To the protestors, the congregants sharing religious ideals with the pastor made them guilty of complicity in his actions as an ICE officer.

There are a million things wrong with this stunt that violated a plethora of basic principles of accountability and committed a whole slew of logical fallacies by the protestors and some here in this discussion trying to rationalize or justify it. One poster here said "A church service was interrupted, it's not the end of the world.". I believe this falls under the fallacy of a false dichotomy. But in any case, no one suggested it was the end of the world and everyone on both sides understands that it wasn't. So it was a stupid thing to say.
Correct there is a first amendment right to report and assemble and protest a pastor’s actions…there is not one to violate someone else’s first amendment right to exercise their faith.
 
NO do not agree its ok to disturb a church service.
Also could state many situations where breaking up a situation Need not end with an arrest.
We are getting a lot more angry and need to try and balance our HATE of each other.
 
NO do not agree its ok to disturb a church service.
Also could state many situations where breaking up a situation Need not end with an arrest.
We are getting a lot more angry and need to try and balance our HATE of each other.
Lemon from his Communist commentary saying he is a journalist is a murderer. This is not first amendment. This is someone who is in the power elite. There are arrests in this and he until proven otherwise will get away with it.
 
NO do not agree its ok to disturb a church service.
Also could state many situations where breaking up a situation Need not end with an arrest.
We are getting a lot more angry and need to try and balance our HATE of each other.
<~~~~~~~~~~>​

Don Lemon Forgot About This Piece of Evidence Which Could Send Him to Jail ~~ Harmeet Dhillon​




Each of the provocateurs and Lemon should also be charged with kidnapping since they held the children hostage and blocked parents from getting to their children. Utterly evil and despicable.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom