The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

[guno]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Somehow WAPO connected birtherism to racism? LMAO

 

[Fenton Lum]

Somehow WAPO connected birtherism to racism? LMAO

Just for folks like you who either support it or rationalize it in their denial.

 

[Boss]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

 

[tigerred59]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

The GOP like most of us, are afraid of angry white people, cause they know these mf's are crazy.....an insanity, they themselves have created, nurtured and grown......and those going against the grain, are subject to the Gabby treatment someday.

I just posted a thread of the damage angry whites bring on us, when allowed to vote and have a voice and the GOP only solidify's my argument.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

It's Guano, too stupid to live and too stupid to realize his article is hilarious

 

[tigerred59]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

You are a racist, now own it, put a period behind it and keep it moving, fool and I wish you cowardly white hicks would stop using blacks to profile your names....its such a wussy white boy move...and typical....for the keyboard cowards that you all are.

 

[tigerred59]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

It's Guano, too stupid to live and too stupid to realize his article is hilarious

And what does that make you? You uhhhh, seem to flock to topics that you then demonetize afterwards...which says 2 things about you....you have no life and and and your about as sane as those you attack.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

It's Guano, too stupid to live and too stupid to realize his article is hilarious

And what does that make you? You uhhhh, seem to flock to topics that you then demonetize afterwards...which says 2 things about you....you have no life and and and your about as sane as those you attack.

Get back on topic. Your childish turd flinging is useless against me

 

[Boss]

You are a racist, now own it, put a period behind it and keep it moving, fool and I wish you cowardly white hicks would stop using blacks to profile your names....its such a wussy white boy move...and typical....for the keyboard cowards that you all are.

You shouldn't cast judgement on people you do not know... that's the first and foremost sign of a BIGOT!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Hillary, the first Birther, must be a racist

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Guno: nuts or just plain fucking insane?

You decide

 

[Hossfly]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

Gee! Are you sure? Are you sure you're sure?

​

 

[LuckyDuck]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

It wouldn't have mattered if the people streaming over our southern border were Hispanic, white, black, or little green men; the fact remains that people "regardless" of race, are entering a sovereign nation "illegally." All people wanting to come in to the United States or any other sovereign nation, must come in legally and via that process, be vetted to ensure that we are not receiving murderers, rapists, and other criminal or terrorist elements.
As to his original stance that Muslims should be restricted from entering, Islam isn't a race, it's a political and religious ideology, most of which is incompatible with secular freedom. And, NO...most Muslims are not innocent people just trying to work and support their families only. Pew research studies have shown, MOST favor Sharia Law, which is completely incompatible with western society. For any women who deny this, go live under Islam for a couple of years and then come back and talk about how equal you felt under Islam.

 

[Brynmr]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

This isn't rational thinking. It's an obcessive and perverted connection to one's feelings.

 

[NoNukes]

So now, it is somehow "racist" to question the birth qualifier in seeking the office of president? It just seems to me that any and every issue anyone can raise about Barack Obama is deemed as racist. Do we now live in a society where black people can never be held to account or questioned on anything they say or do? Clearly, it seems as though some people believe the quantity of melanin in your skin can raise you above all other people in terms of what you're accountable or responsible for. Am I missing something here or is that not the clinical definition of racism?

I think YOU are a racist for calling people racist in bringing up the issue of where someone was born with regard to qualifications to hold office under the laws we've established. If there were no law requiring a president to be "natural born" and people were simply raising the issue of Obama's birthplace to call attention to the fact it's in Africa where black people live... that would be racist. But the law says you must be "a natural born citizen" to run for president and many believe Obama has never proven he was indeed born in Hawaii. It has NOTHING to do with his race, the same questions were raised about Ted Cruz and John McCain.

"RACISM" is the belief that one race is superior or inferior to others. In that regard, this mindset that some people have, where black people cannot be criticized under any circumstance, is certainly racist. You are intentionally raising black people above all other races and making them superior... or charging racism.

It's Guano, too stupid to live and too stupid to realize his article is hilarious

And what does that make you? You uhhhh, seem to flock to topics that you then demonetize afterwards...which says 2 things about you....you have no life and and and your about as sane as those you attack.

Get back on topic. Your childish turd flinging is useless against me

Yes, you getting hit by a turd would be normal.

 

[2aguy]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

Where is the racism....Trump has been in the public eye for decades and not one hint of racism...till he decided to run for office...then the democrats used the tired old play book and the tired old "he's a racist" attack.....

It wasn't a racist theory...it was a legal one moron....if obama was not a citizen he could not be President.....if he had been born in France they could have made the same claim...

In fact....you morons made the same claim about John McCain because he was born in the Panama Canal Zone...and both of his parent's were American citizens....

 

[Blackrook]

guno is a ridiculous idiot and all his threads are the product of a mentally deficient mind.

 

[WillowTree]

The white christian party does have a death wish


So it’s come to this: The institutional position of the Republican Party in the great birther controversy roiling the 2016 campaign — a consequential chapter in our political history — is now essentially that Donald Trump did the nation a service by forcing the first African American president to finally show his papers.

This new GOP storyline has gotten obscured by the ongoing back-and-forth in the media over various subplots (did Hillary Clinton start birtherism? did Trump really keep feeding this conspiracy after 2011?) that are related to the birther battle. Yet it’s unmistakably the larger narrative that the Trump campaign and top Republicans — including the chairman of the Republican National Committee — are telling right now. The Trump campaign’s effort to whitewash his birther history — in which he fed racist conspiracy theories for years — is being widely called out as dishonest. And that’s good. But Trump’s new narrative is actually a lot worse than the rendering of it we’ve seen in most media accounts suggests, and now the party has institutionally joined in promoting it.


The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

The GOP like most of us, are afraid of angry white people, cause they know these mf's are crazy.....an insanity, they themselves have created, nurtured and grown......and those going against the grain, are subject to the Gabby treatment someday.

I just posted a thread of the damage angry whites bring on us, when allowed to vote and have a voice and the GOP only solidify's my argument.

Blow it out your ass! How's that for AWP?

 

[rdean]

The Republican Party is now institutionally defending Donald Trump’s racism

I don't think the GOP is institutionally defending Trump's racism. I think they are instinctively defending what is at the heart of the GOP which of course is racism.

As the GOP attacks Muslims more and more, they will begin to retaliate. Trump's hateful rhetoric will spiral out of control. It will become apparent to the entire nation what the GOP stands for. They will pay the price, not the Muslims.

There Have Been 19 Hate Crimes Against Muslims in the Past Week

How Donald Trump Both Feeds On and Fuels Hatred in America