Doesn't matter - you lost the debate
Only in the dark recesses of you diseased and twisted mind sparky. Good to see the Ms. Lysistrata took you down a notch or 3. Called you out big time on the dishonest horseshit that you post
Thank you for your support, PP! It always angers me that the same people who don't want to fully equip their children so that the kids might navigate the difficult transition between adolescence and adulthood, when hormones and visions of "love" fill their brains, along with an instinct for "horniness," are the same folks who want their children and other children to suffer
for the rest of their lives from the effects of some adolescent experimentation. Many of us have gone through it (I remember "undying love" in my teenage years, when no one thought to speak to us of the difference between love and lust, and didn't lose my "virginity" until I was 18 when the kids in my dorm had a sort of contest going), and if I can do anything to get kids through this difficult period of discovery, including the added tension of realizing that they are LGBT and the brutal social, and many times familial ostracization this realization entails, I sure would do anything I can to assist them. Kids must be taught to handle their natural, sexual selves.
Thank YOU again for representing the voice of sanity and reason, and very eloquently at that. I must say that the vitriol that has been leveled at me here has taken me a bit by surprise, even though I have been on the USMB for a while now. There are some very sick and twisted people here who believe, or pretend to believe that supporting sex education is tantamount to child abuse. It's actually hard to believe that people with such warped view actually exist, and frightening to think that some of them might actually have responsibility for the care and education of young people. Even more disconcerting is the apparent fact that they will seize on conspiracy theories that are questionable at best and run with them as facts. My work is done here.
I'm glad to be of service. I know that you have a great interest in protecting the kids until they can become established, independent adults. Equating a thorough sex education with child abuse is a warped view, which seems more motivated by a desire to get kids bogged down in problems before they have a chance, rather than making sure that they don't pay all their lives for adolescent "mistakes" or experimentation, which we all know that everyone does. It's as if these people never went through puberty, adolescence, and young adulthood themselves and went directly to being elderly idiots.
They also are tacitly admitting that their "abstinence" ideology necessarily fails in the face of the introduction of factual information, as well as raising the possibility that the actual classroom instruction regarding abstinence involves lying to the students, and on the taxpayers' dime. I'd love to see the instructional materials for an "abstinence only" course. Just telling teenagers that if they don't have any kind of sex until they're married, they won't get pregnant, get somebody pregnant, or pick up an STD really doesn't take a whole lot of time.
