The religion of atheists is socialism

[rightwinger]

Another invented "conversation" for ya, congrats son.

Not at all. Do you need for me to break it down for you?

You've proven far too incapable of that son, just call me a "commie" and move on, this bird bath deep shit of yours is nothing but more dysfunctional partisanshit.

I didn't think you would dare me to break it down for you.

dare...dare

We need the laugh

 

[rightwinger]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

 

[ding]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

 

[ding]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy.

I'm an atheist and I'm not a socialist.

That's good. I believe you. I've read some of your comments. I never said they all were. It is usually just the militant atheists that are.

 

[ding]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

 

[ding]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy.

I'm an atheist and I'm not a socialist.

All moderators are socialists

I'm going to need Fenton Lum to pull that chord.

 

[rightwinger]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

So other religious fanatics agree with you?
Color me shocked

Now, explain to the nice people about the magic man in the sky

 

[ding]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

So other religious fanatics agree with you?
Color me shocked

Now, explain to the nice people about the magic man in the sky

There's the rub... just as not all atheists are socialists, not all Christians are evangelicals. The real test of separating the wheat from the chaff is through what they do.

Do you want a bigger central government?
Do you want your central government to regulate social issues?
Do you want to re-distribute wealth?
Do you want to subordinate religion?

 

[rightwinger]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

 

[Fenton Lum]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

So other religious fanatics agree with you?
Color me shocked

Now, explain to the nice people about the magic man in the sky

There's the rub... just as not all atheists are socialists, not all Christians are evangelicals.

Well there's the point for you bub, shove your broad brush categorizations up your arse. And twist.

 

[ding]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

I have already explained it to you. When it elicits a fanatical response to an attack on your dogma of socialism, then it is a religion.

 

[ding]

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

So other religious fanatics agree with you?
Color me shocked

Now, explain to the nice people about the magic man in the sky

There's the rub... just as not all atheists are socialists, not all Christians are evangelicals.

Well there's the point for you bub, shove your broad brush categorizations up your arse. And twist.

How exactly were those broad brushes. They either describe you are they don't. Which is it?

Do you want a bigger central government?
Do you want your central government to regulate social issues?
Do you want to re-distribute wealth?
Do you want to subordinate religion?

 

[Fenton Lum]

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

Its not my definitions. I'm not the first one to recognize the behaviors. I didn't come up with this on my own. It is nothing new. In fact, it is quite an old observation.

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

I. Shafarevich. The Socialist Phenomeon, 1980 by Harper & Row

So other religious fanatics agree with you?
Color me shocked

Now, explain to the nice people about the magic man in the sky

There's the rub... just as not all atheists are socialists, not all Christians are evangelicals.

Well there's the point for you bub, shove your broad brush categorizations up your arse. And twist.

How exactly were those broad brushes. They either describe you are they don't. Which is it?

Do you want a bigger central government?
Do you want your central government to regulate social issues?
Do you want to re-distribute wealth?
Do you want to subordinate religion?

Nope, thanks for finally asking jackass.

 

[rightwinger]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

I have already explained it to you. When it elicits a fanatical response to an attack on your dogma of socialism, then it is a religion.

Odd stretch of logic........but I guess if you will believe in a magic man in the sky, you will believe anything

 

[ding]

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

I have already explained it to you. When it elicits a fanatical response to an attack on your dogma of socialism, then it is a religion.

Odd stretch of logic........but I guess if you will believe in a magic man in the sky, you will believe anything

So you can recognize the fanatical behaviors of a religious person ans draw a line but you can't recognize the fanatical behaviors of a socialist zealot and draw a line?

 

[ding]

Well there's the point for you bub, shove your broad brush categorizations up your arse. And twist.

How exactly were those broad brushes. They either describe you are they don't. Which is it?

Do you want a bigger central government?
Do you want your central government to regulate social issues?
Do you want to re-distribute wealth?
Do you want to subordinate religion?

Nope, thanks for finally asking jackass.

Suit yourself. Thanks for proving my point.

 

[ding]

The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals.

 

[rightwinger]

No belief is not a dogma

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

I have already explained it to you. When it elicits a fanatical response to an attack on your dogma of socialism, then it is a religion.

Odd stretch of logic........but I guess if you will believe in a magic man in the sky, you will believe anything

So you can recognize the fanatical behaviors of a religious person ans draw a line but you can't recognize the fanatical behaviors of a socialist zealot and draw a line?

Once again, your lack of logic amuses me

Let me tell you about this jolly old elf who comes down my chimney and brings me toys.......if you don't believe me....You are a SOCIALIST!

 

[ding]

It is when it is held above all reason and and logic and elicits an emotional response which rivals fanaticism when it is challenged.

How is non belief fanaticism?

The fanaticism belongs to those who start threads about those who do not buy into their fairy tales

I have already explained it to you. When it elicits a fanatical response to an attack on your dogma of socialism, then it is a religion.

Odd stretch of logic........but I guess if you will believe in a magic man in the sky, you will believe anything

So you can recognize the fanatical behaviors of a religious person ans draw a line but you can't recognize the fanatical behaviors of a socialist zealot and draw a line?

Once again, your lack of logic amuses me

Let me tell you about this jolly old elf who comes down my chimney and brings me toys.......if you don't believe me....You are a SOCIALIST!

I'm happy enough to let others decide for them selves which one of us is using logic and the power of observation and which one of us is using emotion.

The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals.

 

[ding]

Let me tell you about this jolly old elf who comes down my chimney and brings me toys.......if you don't believe me....You are a SOCIALIST!

You are free to believe whatever you want. Just as I am free to believe whatever I want. Your beliefs are of no concern to me. Are my beliefs a concern for you?

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man.