The religion of atheists is socialism

[rightwinger]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists?

We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

They aren't all that sure of their own non-silliness, that's all it is, the preverbial la-la-la-la with fingers in ears bit.

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

 

[ding]

There is by definition no "religion of atheism". Atheism is simply the rejection of Theism. Full stop.

That'll be three cents for brain cell rental. Three cents you could have saved by using your own.


None of which has jack friggety squat to do with socialism or any other economic ideology. But if you wanna see something that does --- check Acts 2 - 4.

These guys disagree with you.

Charles Fourier. La Theorié des quatre mouvements et des destinées générales. (Quotations refer to the Russian translation, Teoriia chetyrekh dvizhenii i vseobshchikh sudeb. In: Izbrannye sochineniia, vol. I, Moscow, 1938.)

Michail Bakunins sozial-politischer Briefwechsel mit Alexander Ivanovitsch Herzen. Stuttgart, 1895.

G. Le Bon. Psychologie du socialisme. (Quotations refer to Russian translation, Psikhologiia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

S. Frank. "Etika nigilizma" ("The Ethics of Nihilism," in Russian). In: Vekhi (Landmarks), Moscow, 1909.

S. Bulgakov. Pervokhristianstvo i noveishii sotsializm (Early Christianity and Modern Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1911.

S. Bulgakov. Khristianstvo i sotsializm (Christianity and Socialism, in Russian). Moscow, 1917

W. Gurian. Der Bolschewismus. Freiburg, 1931 giia sotsializma, St. Petersburg, 1908.)

H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955

 

[ding]

Humanity took a very wrong turn once it locked onto the concept of a male domintor god percpetual reality.

Funny you should mention that, I was just reading this.... you and Marcuse see eye to eye. You do know who Marcuse is, right? Now you know where you get your utopian ideas from... the father of cultural marxism. Thank you for proving my point.

"Marcuse is in agreement with Freud that repression is the necessary price for survival, but he asserts that surplus-repression with all its consequences may be overcome with the help of the latest achievements in technology. Without going into the details of this process (as a rule, one word is used: "automation"), Marcuse draws a picture of a future unrepressed society. It is based on the liberation of the instincts from the control of "repressive reason." This will lead to regression, in comparison to the level of civilization and reason that had been achieved: "It would reactivate early stages of the libido which were surpassed in the development of the reality ego, and it would dissolve the institutions of society in which the reality ego exists." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 198) "The regression involved in this spread of the libido would first manifest itself in a reactivation of all erotogenic zones and, consequently, in a resurgence of pregenital polymorphous sexuality and in a decline of genital supremacy." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 201) The body as a whole will become an instrument of satisfaction. "This change in the value and scope of libidinal relations would lead to a disintegration of the institutions in which the private interpersonal relations have been organized, particularly the monogamic and patriarchal family." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 201) Reason, which is the instrument of the ego, will to a large extent give way to fantasy connected with the id. And this will open up new' ways to understand the future; it will reveal the reality of the possibilities formerly perceived only as elements of a utopia. The liberation of sexual instincts will lead to the development of "libidinal rationality," which will show the way to a higher form of free civilization."

 

[Fenton Lum]

Humanity took a very wrong turn once it locked onto the concept of a male domintor god percpetual reality.

Funny you should mention that, I was just reading this.... you and Marcuse see eye to eye. You do know who Marcuse is, right? Now you know where you get your utopian ideas from... the father of cultural marxism. Thank you for proving my point.

"Marcuse is in agreement with Freud that repression is the necessary price for survival, but he asserts that surplus-repression with all its consequences may be overcome with the help of the latest achievements in technology. Without going into the details of this process (as a rule, one word is used: "automation"), Marcuse draws a picture of a future unrepressed society. It is based on the liberation of the instincts from the control of "repressive reason." This will lead to regression, in comparison to the level of civilization and reason that had been achieved: "It would reactivate early stages of the libido which were surpassed in the development of the reality ego, and it would dissolve the institutions of society in which the reality ego exists." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 198) "The regression involved in this spread of the libido would first manifest itself in a reactivation of all erotogenic zones and, consequently, in a resurgence of pregenital polymorphous sexuality and in a decline of genital supremacy." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 201) The body as a whole will become an instrument of satisfaction. "This change in the value and scope of libidinal relations would lead to a disintegration of the institutions in which the private interpersonal relations have been organized, particularly the monogamic and patriarchal family." (H. Marcuse. Eros and Civilization. A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud. Boston, 1955: p. 201) Reason, which is the instrument of the ego, will to a large extent give way to fantasy connected with the id. And this will open up new' ways to understand the future; it will reveal the reality of the possibilities formerly perceived only as elements of a utopia. The liberation of sexual instincts will lead to the development of "libidinal rationality," which will show the way to a higher form of free civilization."

"commie" is the best you've got? Brilliant.

 

[ding]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists?

We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

They aren't all that sure of their own non-silliness, that's all it is, the preverbial la-la-la-la with fingers in ears bit.

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

Yup, that's it.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists?

We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

They aren't all that sure of their own non-silliness, that's all it is, the preverbial la-la-la-la with fingers in ears bit.

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all.

You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

 

[ding]

"commie" is the best you've got? Brilliant

No, the best I "got" was showing you that your beliefs came the father of cultural marxism.

 

[ding]

Yup, that's it.

So says the guy who sees eye to eye with Marcuse the father of cultural marxism.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy. It is based on atheism and deification of man. It proceeds in almost all its manifestations from the assumption that the basic principles guiding the life of an individual and of mankind in general do not go beyond the satisfaction of material needs or primitive instincts. They have no distinction between good and evil, no morality or any other kind of value, save pleasure. Their doctrine is abolition of private property, abolition of family, abolition of religion and communality or equality. The religious nature of socialism explains the extraordinary attraction to socialist doctrines and its capacity to inflame individuals and inspire popular movements and condemn respect for any who believe in Christianity. They practice moral relativity, indiscriminate indiscriminateness, multiculturalism, cultural marxism and normalization of deviance. Their hostility towards traditional religions is that of an animosity between a rival religion. They can be identified by an external locus of control. They worship science but are the first to argue against it.

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists?

We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

They aren't all that sure of their own non-silliness, that's all it is, the preverbial la-la-la-la with fingers in ears bit.

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

Yup, that's it.

So says the guy who admittedly has the same belief as Marcuse.

Another invented "conversation" for ya, congrats son.

 

[ding]

America religious separatism often uses collectivism (socialism to you).

The shoe fits.

 

[ding]

Another invented "conversation" for ya, congrats son.

Not at all. Do you need for me to break it down for you?

 

[rightwinger]

Why the insistence of forcing religion on atheists? We just think your beliefs are silly...what is religious about that?

Anyone who does not believe my silly religious claims is.......SOCIALIST

I think the real problem here is that I have shined a spotlight on the reason you get so inflamed by social issues. You are a religious fanatic.

No....think of it as being more like a skeptic

I have heard your definitions of your religion and find them to be laughable. Identical to a child's belief in Santa
You do so want it to be true that you ignore all evidence to the contrary

 

[Fenton Lum]

Another invented "conversation" for ya, congrats son.

Not at all. Do you need for me to break it down for you?

You've proven far too incapable of that son, just call me a "commie" and move on, this bird bath deep shit of yours is nothing but more dysfunctional partisanshit.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy.

I'm an atheist and I'm not a socialist.

 

[Fenton Lum]

"commie" is the best you've got? Brilliant

No, the best I "got" was showing you that your beliefs came the father of cultural marxism.

You mean you need for them to so you make shit up and asign.

 

[Fenton Lum]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy.

I'm an atheist and I'm not a socialist.

Nope, sorry, no category for that with this twit.

 

[rightwinger]

Their religion is socialism which worships big government and social policy.

I'm an atheist and I'm not a socialist.

All moderators are socialists

 

[ding]

Because he didn't agree with you. This is really old tactic wise son, you can't handle free thought, that's all. You start a thread about social issues, someone responds, you're a "light" because they respond to your thread with a different view. Weak, thin.

I can handle free thought all day long. It is you who seems to be offended by my free thought. What exactly have I gotten offended about? That you disagree with my views? It seems that you are mistaking my using your comments to prove my point as me getting upset. I couldn't be happier. You guys are proving my point.

I didn't say I was a light. I said I shined a light on his behaviors - behaviors which no one has refuted yet - and which explain why you guys get so inflamed about anything that goes against your dogma.

 

[ding]

Another invented "conversation" for ya, congrats son.

Not at all. Do you need for me to break it down for you?

You've proven far too incapable of that son, just call me a "commie" and move on, this bird bath deep shit of yours is nothing but more dysfunctional partisanshit.

I didn't think you would dare me to break it down for you.