Was he, or was he not, a human being? Does whether the government counted him as such in any way reflect the reality of his humanity?
Legally, he wasn't. You aren't a person until a birth certificate is issued.
I don't care about Leave It To Beaver. That is a tired trope.
The fact is my way works 100% of the time. One-hundred-percent. That is reality. Ignore it at your own peril.
Yeah, okay... It's like a lot of solutions that sound great, until you get real people involved.
Two scientific review papers find abstinence-only education is ineffective at delaying sexual initiation or reducing sexual risk behaviors. Learn more.
www.publichealth.columbia.edu
two scientific review papers find abstinence-only-until-marriage programs and policies in the United States are ineffective because they do not delay sexual initiation or reduce sexual risk behaviors. According to the researchers, these programs also violate adolescent human rights, withhold medically accurate information, stigmatize or exclude many youth, reinforce harmful gender stereotypes, and undermine public health programs. Both papers are published online in the Journal of Adolescent Health.
I support and have raised funds for pro-life clinics
Don't care. Your virtue signaling aside, forcing women to have babies they DIDN'T WANT and then making them beg for charity in front of your imaginary sky friend is beyond cruel.
So I want to "force" woman to give birth, like I want to "force" husbands not to murder their wives, like I want to "force" wives not to murder their husbands, like I want to "force" rapists not to rape, like I want to "force" slaveowners to not be allowed to have slaves, like I want to "force" sex-traffickers to release their victims.
That's nice. Not everyone agrees with our opinion that fetuses are people. Also, such a law would be unenforceable.
My idea of "force" is in reality an adherence to protecting civil rights. Don't confuse the idea of the proper role of government, to protect the civil rights of persons, not violate rights of said persons. That's the difference between the "right wing" and the "left wing."
No, stupid, you would have to create a system of enslaving women to make your policies work. No medical privacy, etc.
Also, in addition to your query on reducing abortions, a very effective tool to do that is ultrasounds, which many pro-life clinics do, such as those in my area. When expectant mothers see the ultrasounds, 80% will not abort. Imagine if Planned Parenthood would show the pregnant woman these images, well... naw, that would cut into their profits. They need victims, they need repeat customers, they need advocates, and truth is very inconvenient.
Oh, look, someone who thinks the "Wand of Shame" works.
The journal Obstetrics & Gynecology published an important study this month: the deepest inquiry yet into whether viewing ultrasound images can...
slate.com
For many people, Blacks weren't considered human like Whites. A wrong-headed belief is a wrong-headed belief.
Nope. Nobody ever believed that.
The "color" or immigration status of these women is irrelevant.
Every miscarriage would not have to be investigated. That is a false narrative. If there is ample evidence of a crime, then and only then will action be necessary. And let justice prevail.
Uh, yeah, actually it did. They wouldn't have tried to pull this shit on a white woman and you know it.
How do you NOT investigate every miscarriage? Taking the word of the same OB/GYN who was performing abortions last week that yup, this was totally a miscarriage, trust me!
Every year in the US we have 600K abortions and 200K Miscarriages.
How do you even find out if she was pregnant to start with? Unless her boyfriend or husband informs on her. Do we go through medical records at every OB/GYN? I mean, you fuckwits on the right fought tooth and nail against mask and vaccine mandates, you really expect to be able to enforce an abortion ban?
humandefense.com
www.nationalreview.com
