BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 44,062
- 27,188
- 2,615
Biden policies. People are supposed to buy electric cars.Ok. So tell me why fuel costs so much right now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Biden policies. People are supposed to buy electric cars.Ok. So tell me why fuel costs so much right now.
Because she’s a career politician, she knows all the ins and outs and caveats to keep her butt covered. Whose wheels to grease and who to befriend. She has a lifetime of experience in covering her butt.The right has accused her of everything else. You might as well throw that one in the pile too. If she was guilty of all the things you have accused her of, why can't you prove any of them?
Anyone who believes they did are dead wrong. Putin preferred Clinton because she was a known quantity and Putin knew how to deal with her. That is the real truth. The rest is made up bullshit.Anyone believing the lie that Russia didn't interfere in the 2016 election on behalf of the Trumpybear has been completely Groomed by the Neo-GOP PR team. Good luck re-installing your leader.
That would seem to indicate he’s either a dumb ass or a fraud.
Anyone who believes they did are dead wrong. Putin preferred Clinton because she was a known quantity and Putin knew how to deal with her. That is the real truth. The rest is made up bullshit.
Trump certainly was terribly ignorant of those in and out of government who worked to unseat and undermine him. How he could be so ignorant is hard to understand.
Bulldog's is not just smallSmall minds are amazed by the funniest things.
I believe it was more a case of too trusting, and some innocent and naive regards the difference of career politicians, and guv'mint employees (apparatchiks), versus those he dealt with in the business world.Trump certainly was terribly ignorant of those in and out of government who worked to unseat and undermine him. How he could be so ignorant is hard to understand.
Post all the propaganda you want.When mass protests against Russian President Vladimir Putin erupted in Moscow in December 2011, Putin made clear who he thought was really behind them: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
With the protesters accusing Putin of having rigged recent elections, the Russian leader pointed an angry finger at Clinton, who had issued a statement sharply critical of the voting results. “She said they were dishonest and unfair,” Putin fumed in public remarks, saying that Clinton gave “a signal” to demonstrators working “with the support of the U.S. State Department” to undermine his power. “We need to safeguard ourselves from this interference in our internal affairs,” Putin declared.
![]()
Why Putin hates Hillary
Behind the allegations of a Russian hack of the DNC is the Kremlin leader's fury at Clinton for challenging the fairness of Russian elections.www.politico.com
Former U.S. officials who worked on Russia policy with Clinton say that Putin was personally stung by Clinton’s December 2011 condemnation of Russia’s parliamentary elections, and had his anger communicated directly to President Barack Obama. They say Putin and his advisers are also keenly aware that, even as she executed Obama’s “reset” policy with Russia, Clinton took a harder line toward Moscow than others in the administration. And they say Putin sees Clinton as a forceful proponent of “regime change” policies that the Russian leader considers a grave threat to his own survival.
More a matter of getting such before a judge who is objective and won't deny filing of a case based upon procedural technicalities, etc.The right has accused her of everything else. You might as well throw that one in the pile too. If she was guilty of all the things you have accused her of, why can't you prove any of them?
[/QUOTE]I believe it was more a case of too trusting, and some innocent and naive regards the difference of career politicians, and guv'mint employees (apparatchiks), versus those he dealt with in the business world.
Hogs find acorns using their nose more than their eyes, but you show how ignorance runs on several levels.True, and a blind hog can occasionally find an acorn, but it's not something you can count on.
Post all the propaganda you want.
I was referring to more than the FISA issue, rather the whole Drain the Swamp goal and how difficult that would be in one term when it's had decades to entrench. Compounded when many on his staff and close appointees were two-faced and slyly working against him.
That is the counter narrative both Billy the Bagman, and his hired lackey John Durham, have tried so hard........and so unsuccessfully to establish. Not that I don't understand why you'd want to give it yet another try as we get closer to the 1/6 committee's public hearings.Liberals want everyone to focus on Jan 6th to keep others from focusing on the real coup d'etat, that turned out to be successful. The Russian hoax scandal turned out to be a lie.
More a matter of getting such before a judge who is objective and won't deny filing of a case based upon procedural technicalities, etc.
Putin as forced to sell the West nuclear material from their decommissioned nuclear weapons and the Clinton gang honed in on the Trucking scam Vald was running here in the states and forced him to pay them millions under the table. Then they forced him to buy those low yielding dirt mines that nobody wanted......And she said nasty things about Puti-bears daughter too! She was the most hated American Woman in all of Russia. They loved the TrumpyGirls over there too.
Here, poster 'shrugged'....go to one of two places, or hell, go to both: Read the piece by Woodward & Bernstein in today's Washington Post; or, go to the nearby thread about the 'Select Committee stepping into the batter box'. In both you will see a succinct statement from this famous reporting duo on how Don Trump was more dangerous to America, and more corrupt, than was Richard Nixon.It was an absolute coup & treason involving the Dems & the GOP establishment. Notice the GOP will not even mention all the vast proof the election was stolen.
- That would seem to indicate he’s either a dumb ass or a fraud.
- While he certainly is an ignorant fool, he did say some things many Americans agree with.
The above triptych would make for an interesting stand-alone thread.
- Yes but even an ignorant fool can be right once an awhile.
"New World Order"?Liberals should be thanking Trump for helping fulfill their New World Order
Still ...That is the counter narrative both Billy the Bagman, and his hired lackey John Durham, have tried so hard........and so unsuccessfully to establish. Not that I don't understand why you'd want to give it yet another try as we get closer to the 1/6 committee's public hearings.
Mueller set a very high standard that needed to be met by his investigation. Not the legally undefined term collusion, but rather criminal conspiracy between both Trumpers and Russians to alter the election's outcome.
Two actions taken by members of the campaign met that standard. 1. Donnie J's Tower meeting which he agreed to with the understanding he would receive compromising info on Hillary from the Russian government. Mueller, being a Repub, decided not to prosecute because he determined Donnie J was too stupid to know he was breaking the law.
![]()
Donald Trump Jr. 'Too Dumb' to Prosecute | Law & Crime
Some wondered if the president's son, Donald Trump Jr., would be charged in the Mueller investigation. Well, that's not the case.lawandcrime.com
2. When Paul Manafort was Trump's campaign manager he gave proprietary polling data to Kilimnik, who was deemed by the Senate Intel Com. report to be a Russian operative. That polling data ended up being given to the Kremlin.
![]()
US says Russia was given Trump campaign polling data in 2016
WASHINGTON (AP) — It was one of the more tantalizing, yet unresolved, questions of the investigation into possible connections between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign: Why was a business associate of campaign chairman Paul Manafort given internal polling data — and what did he dapnews.com
This is Mueller's comment about the transaction from his report.
Because of questions about Manafort’s credibility and our limited ability to gather evidence on what happened to the polling data after it was sent to Kilimnik, the Office could not assess what Kilimnik (or others he may have given it to) did with it. The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort’s sharing polling data and Russia’s interference in the election, which had already been reported by U.S. media outlets at the time of the August 2 meeting. The investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts.
If Mueller had been able to establish the polling data ended up in Russia's hands that would have been slam dunk evidence of a cooperative conspiracy.
Overall, the report said, Manafort's proximity to then-candidate Trump "created opportunities for the Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign." Manafort's willingness to share information with Kilimnik and other Russian operatives, it said, "represented a grave counterintelligence threat."
![]()
Senate Intelligence Committee releases final report on 2016 Russian interference
The fifth and final chapter spans nearly 1,000 pages and deals with counterintelligence concerns.www.cbsnews.com