The Psychology of Qanon

1612225219042.png
 
99 % or 99.9 % of America doesn't care....the fact you do is telling
So you don't believe this "Storm" nonsense. You don't buy into the pedophile blood driniking nonsense. You understand that Trump lost the election.

True?
 
So you don't believe this "Storm" nonsense. You don't buy into the pedophile blood driniking nonsense. You understand that Trump lost the election.

True?

No one has fucking heard of it.

And I'm still not convinced that you Nazis aren't making all this shit up

Never met anyone promoting QAnon - but you Nazis spewing your hate are legion.
 
I don't believe any of it, unless there is evidence shown otherwise. With that said, it would be a really good idea to discredit something if there is known evidence out in the world.

Is that what's happening here? I don't know. I still need the evidence. Until that happens, this is a nothing burger.
So all thise MAGArats at the Capitol with the Q on their shirts ad flags expecting the Dems to be arrrested and hung...?

Followers of QAnon also believe that there is an imminent event known as the "Storm", when thousands of members of the cabal will be arrested and possibly sent to Guantanamo Bay prison or to face military tribunals, and the U.S. military will brutally take over the country.[7] The result will be salvation and utopia on earth.[64]
You know more about it than any Republican, or Democrat, I know personally. *shrugs*

Edit: To be absolutely fair, I thought Antifa was bullshit for a long while as well. So...
 
The problem with the article is that it began with a specific and ended with the universal. So people inclined to disbelieve any notion that the Trump conspiracy theories are just that - factually unsupportable conspiracy theories - dismissed it. But my question concerns the concluding sentence. And that's where the article should have begun.

" Because the truth is that conspiracy theories will always thrive when people feel like they are not in control of their lives, and when significant tension exists between societal subgroups."

That's absolutely true but shouldn't be limited to Trumpism or mAGA.

Why do Maga supporters feel a tension between other groups in America and lack the ability to control their own lives? And saying their nuts is not a correct answer. Even men who burned women as witches (an example from the article) had a common reason or philosophical connection. A logical fallacy to put it mildly, but there was a common reason.

What is the Maga connection between people? And how can that compare and contrast to other groups?

60% of Dems think Putin has something on Trump. Blacks are least likely to want the covid vaccine.



The issue is simple.

The mainstream press has no credibility - zero.

The so-called press are open propagandists for the party and for the Reich. No one believes anything the Baghdad Bob's of the NY Times vomit out - no one, not party members and not the Patriots. CNN and NBC are laughable fools who brazenly lie to our face even as contrary fact is presented. CNN pisses in our face and swears that it's raining even as the August sun beats down.

Years of complete absurdity by the party propaganda corps who have utter contempt for not only the truth, but for the American people who they believe so stupid as to believe the outrageous lies they publish and broadcast have left the party propaganda corps a laughing stock. No one believes the bullshit the democrat party clowns spew. You may dutifully recite it as a party member - but unless you are mentally retarded, you know full well that it's all lies.

The Internet allows the truth to occasionally slip through. Much of this is highly embarrassing to the party. So democrats do what is their Nazi nature, the slander, defame, and lie.

The Nazi Party defames detractors by labeling anything contrary to party dogma as "conspiracy." Never mind that the Russia Collusion hoax is the biggest and most absurd conspiracy theory in decades, and that the Nazi party still promotes it even after it has been proven beyond all doubt false. Anything harmful to the party, anything that exposes the clownish lies of the party press, anything that exposes the graft and corruption of the Reich, is defamed as a "conspiracy theory."

There are some conspiracy theories, and some are doozies. But the majority of the slander by the Reich Press is simply an attempt to discredit information harmful to the party.

This is a multi-pronged attack, censor, ban, discredit. The Reich fears information above all else. Usually the democrats cannot refute, so they defame. It's the Nazi way.
But to be in Maga you have to believe votes were changed or thrown out. There is nothing in the MSM, wall st J. Faux or even Rushbo to support that.

Maga is not the only group believing conspiracies. But dems are not told they can overturn an election, even when most believe Putin is behind Trump and blacks are telling other blacks to not believe fears of the vaccines.

When there are missing pieces of any story, conspiracies will fill in the blanks.

People don't necessarily have any proof of election fraud, but they know something wasn't right, and they see dems doing everything they can to make sure nothing is found out....
Trump got every recount he asked for, done by gopers and reviewed in courts by gopers. You are a conspiracy NUT. Not that there aren't NUTS in the progressive camp too.

Recounts are not audits
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.

Where in the thread was that claim? Is this another one of your crazy delusions?
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.

Where in the thread was that claim? Is this another one of your crazy delusions?
They bend reality to their world.

I think he really believes that I did that.

There's no point in trying to communicate with them.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.

Where in the thread was that claim? Is this another one of your crazy delusions?

It's called the premis of the op.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.

Where in the thread was that claim? Is this another one of your crazy delusions?

It's called the premis of the op.

It's called you're out to lunch. Get help.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.
Single digit IQ Dimwingers are obsessed with this outfit. Republicans don’t know a thing about them. I did a Qanon search and there was page after page of pissy pants threads started by Dimwingers.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.
Single digit IQ Dimwingers are obsessed with this outfit. Republicans don’t know a thing about them. I did a Qanon search and there was page after page of pissy pants threads started by Dimwingers.

If you're a Trump supporter, you won't get very far talking about IQ. Stick with emotional pleas and batshit crazy. It's your thing.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.
Single digit IQ Dimwingers are obsessed with this outfit. Republicans don’t know a thing about them. I did a Qanon search and there was page after page of pissy pants threads started by Dimwingers.

If you're a Trump supporter, you won't get very far talking about IQ. Stick with emotional pleas and batshit crazy. It's your thing.
Facts upset you, huh?

Typical Dimwinger.
 
Taking over a party and being the entire party are two different things.

I really had to say that? Really?
You are using hyperbole. Do I have to say that? Really?

Is the conversation in the Media thread just bullshit?
YOU brought up "the whole party", not me. And that conversation started with a Trumpster claiming that "a vast majority" of Republicans don't know who Q is. So take it up with that poster.

And you started a stupid thread claiming anyone who took an opposing view to your bull shit was Q....liar.
Single digit IQ Dimwingers are obsessed with this outfit. Republicans don’t know a thing about them. I did a Qanon search and there was page after page of pissy pants threads started by Dimwingers.

If you're a Trump supporter, you won't get very far talking about IQ. Stick with emotional pleas and batshit crazy. It's your thing.
Facts upset you, huh?

Typical Dimwinger.

We could start with the fact that I'm not a Democrat. I'm just not a moron (ie Trump supporter).
 

Forum List

Back
Top