the people were right again: looks like there were 2 shooters that killed JFK

It carried over to Newspapers ( Many had banner headlines “ President Kennedy Killed in Dallas Ambush “ in first editions after incident ) I saw several cities editions with my own eyes
If true that is the exception and meaningless

They mentioned murder and assassin but ambush was not in any reports


Technically however it was an ambush. By one person. Yes such an act might often involve more than one attacker especially in themilitary but the word is not limited to multiple attackers.

One person CAN ambush another and the word still fits
 
1. The 10's to hundreds of testimonies of a strong odor of gun powder on the street level.
2. The 10's to hundreds of testimonies that they saw smoke coming from the grassy knoll, and heard loud gunshots in that direction
3. The sound of 4 gunshots from a radio that was on throughout the assassination.

All completely discount and debunk the Warren Commission's aggressive claims.
You nailed it :thup: But he is a shill from Langley same as the Nazi so your wasting your breath
 
It seem clear to me that there had to have been a conspiracy because the evidence simply doesn’t support the claim that it was a lone gunman. It seems reasonably certain that fuckin’ Oswald was one of the shooters.

But since it’s also apparent that the shot that killed Kennedy came from in front, that gunshot had to have been fired from in front of President Kennedy. Oswald was behind the President.

Logic thus shows that someone other than Oswald fired the fatal head shot.
 
It seem clear to me that there had to have been a conspiracy because the evidence simply doesn’t support the claim that it was a lone gunman. It seems reasonably certain that fuckin’ Oswald was one of the shooters.

But since it’s also apparent that the shot that killed Kennedy came from in front, that gunshot had to have been fired from in front of President Kennedy. Oswald was behind the President.

Logic thus shows that someone other than Oswald fired the fatal head shot.
The evidence does indeed support the conclusuon that OSwald was the only shooter

There is no evidence of a conspiracy

It is not the least bit apparent he was shot fromthe front

The shot that killed Kennedy came from above and beind and there is no evidence to the contrary
 
The shot that killed Kennedy came from above and beind and there is no evidence to the contrary
You're right about that. There was no shooter from the front. Its easy to dismiss the claims otherwise. Two shooters? Kennedy was hit twice by 2 shooters? They were not very good snipers if that were the case.

What isn't so easily dismissed is Oswald acting alone. The actions before and after the killing were really peculiar. For one thing, why not bring your pistol with you if you're going to shoot the President with a rifle? Surely anyone would expect some sort of post-assassination confrontation. Going home to get your gun when you could have brought it with you makes little sense UNLESS you don't foresee needing it. Now why would he not need it? If you were promised some sort of "get away" or someone else to take care of the opposition in the post-assassination confrontation....I can see leaving the gun at the house. Outside of that...no reason to not come heavy.

Then...winding up at a movie theater. Again, sounds strange unless you're going to meet someone in a place where you can't be seen very easily.

I've posted my theory here before (no proof of this of course) but here it is again.
=====
Fact. In the month or so before 11/22/63, Oswald went to Mexico City and visited some Eastern Bloc embassies trying to re-defect to Cuba or the USSR. He was turned down.

My theory (this is what I'm looking for from you in regards to 9/11)
is that he told someone at the Cuban embassy that he would kill Kennedy. He likely tried to "trade" on his previous attempt in the Spring on General Edwin Walker but Cubans were not impressed. Walker (like most generals) was a devout anti-Communist. So Oswald offered up Kennedy. My theory continues that the Cuban embassy officials in Mexico City didn't contact Havana and likely not the Mexico City station chief. I think one of the staffers there told Oswald, basically to "knock himself out" when it came to killing Kennedy--not thinking that this guy would go through with it. But if he did...all the better. My theory continues that at some point, in Dallas, the unofficial Cubans at the embassy in Mexico City through intermediaries got to Oswald and told him that they would ferry him out of the country after he killed Kennedy.

Fact. Oswald left his rifle in the Texas School book Depository (TSBD). He was seen carrying a large package into the TSBD.

Fact. Oswald left his wedding ring and $170 for his wife before leaving.

Fact. Oswald had a revolver that he didn't bring with him although he could have very easily have brought it with him.

My theory continues that after he killed Kennedy he left the TSBD and expected to be picked up by his unofficial Cuban contact. This was, of course, never going to happen since it was never an official operation by Cuban Intelligence. It was a guy in the Cuban Embassy in Mexico who was free-lancing. So when he knew he'd been had...he starts taking evasive action...taxis, a bus, and ultimately showing up at the Texas Theater--likely where he met the intermediary.

Fact. When arrested, Oswald said "I'm just a patsy" He didn't say he didn't do it--admittedly he didn't have a lot of time with the press. But it seems to me that he'd say "I didn't do it!" I mean...if you were to be accused of something this serious...I would be shouting "I didn't do it."...not "I'm just a patsy".

Conclusion:
If he left behind his rifle and didn't bring his gun, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd need them. He thought he'd be on a flight to Havana or Mexico.

Since he left his wedding ring behind and his life savings, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd be needing them or predicting he wouldn't return. So again...if he didn't think he'd have the help I speculated about before...why not bring the revolver with you?
 
You're right about that. There was no shooter from the front. Its easy to dismiss the claims otherwise. Two shooters? Kennedy was hit twice by 2 shooters? They were not very good snipers if that were the case.

What isn't so easily dismissed is Oswald acting alone. The actions before and after the killing were really peculiar. For one thing, why not bring your pistol with you if you're going to shoot the President with a rifle? Surely anyone would expect some sort of post-assassination confrontation. Going home to get your gun when you could have brought it with you makes little sense UNLESS you don't foresee needing it. Now why would he not need it? If you were promised some sort of "get away" or someone else to take care of the opposition in the post-assassination confrontation....I can see leaving the gun at the house. Outside of that...no reason to not come heavy.

Then...winding up at a movie theater. Again, sounds strange unless you're going to meet someone in a place where you can't be seen very easily.

I've posted my theory here before (no proof of this of course) but here it is again.
=====
Fact. In the month or so before 11/22/63, Oswald went to Mexico City and visited some Eastern Bloc embassies trying to re-defect to Cuba or the USSR. He was turned down.

My theory (this is what I'm looking for from you in regards to 9/11)
is that he told someone at the Cuban embassy that he would kill Kennedy. He likely tried to "trade" on his previous attempt in the Spring on General Edwin Walker but Cubans were not impressed. Walker (like most generals) was a devout anti-Communist. So Oswald offered up Kennedy. My theory continues that the Cuban embassy officials in Mexico City didn't contact Havana and likely not the Mexico City station chief. I think one of the staffers there told Oswald, basically to "knock himself out" when it came to killing Kennedy--not thinking that this guy would go through with it. But if he did...all the better. My theory continues that at some point, in Dallas, the unofficial Cubans at the embassy in Mexico City through intermediaries got to Oswald and told him that they would ferry him out of the country after he killed Kennedy.

Fact. Oswald left his rifle in the Texas School book Depository (TSBD). He was seen carrying a large package into the TSBD.

Fact. Oswald left his wedding ring and $170 for his wife before leaving.

Fact. Oswald had a revolver that he didn't bring with him although he could have very easily have brought it with him.

My theory continues that after he killed Kennedy he left the TSBD and expected to be picked up by his unofficial Cuban contact. This was, of course, never going to happen since it was never an official operation by Cuban Intelligence. It was a guy in the Cuban Embassy in Mexico who was free-lancing. So when he knew he'd been had...he starts taking evasive action...taxis, a bus, and ultimately showing up at the Texas Theater--likely where he met the intermediary.

Fact. When arrested, Oswald said "I'm just a patsy" He didn't say he didn't do it--admittedly he didn't have a lot of time with the press. But it seems to me that he'd say "I didn't do it!" I mean...if you were to be accused of something this serious...I would be shouting "I didn't do it."...not "I'm just a patsy".

Conclusion:
If he left behind his rifle and didn't bring his gun, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd need them. He thought he'd be on a flight to Havana or Mexico.

Since he left his wedding ring behind and his life savings, one can logically surmise that he didn't think he'd be needing them or predicting he wouldn't return. So again...if he didn't think he'd have the help I speculated about before...why not bring the revolver with you?
He could not have easily brought the pistol with him.

The rifle was more important and they were stored seperately. he required a ride to get to Irving to retrieve the rifle and only got a ride with a coleague to reach irving because the other guy lived in Irving.
 
He could not have easily brought the pistol with him.

The rifle was more important and they were stored seperately. he required a ride to get to Irving to retrieve the rifle and only got a ride with a coleague to reach irving because the other guy lived in Irving.
Oswald never fired a gun that day. This is obvious.
 
He could not have easily brought the pistol with him.

The rifle was more important and they were stored seperately. he required a ride to get to Irving to retrieve the rifle and only got a ride with a coleague to reach irving because the other guy lived in Irving.
Nonsense....

Its a cab ride he could have performed at any number of times prior to shooting JFK.
 
yesterday's conspiracies are tomorrows spoiler alerts yet again........~S~
 
Nonsense....

Its a cab ride he could have performed at any number of times prior to shooting JFK.
Wrong

Retrieving his rifle required explaining himself and waiting till an opportune moment. It also would have attracted attention which he wished to avoid

His wish was to kill the president and he was not concerned with getting away. That concerne probably did change a little when he mangaed to slip out of the building. That was when he considered he pistol

you are completely grasping at weak straws
 
15th post
His gun was found and no other

His prints on it and the expenmded shells. All bullets matched to his gun alone.

Howward Brennan saw him shoot it

His pistol used to shoot tibets witnesses saw him shoot tibbets

All facts

You have nothing
No evidence exists Oswald fired a gun that day. The evidence shows he didn’t do it.

He was a patsy and that’s why your grandpa’s buddy Jack Ruby was hired to assassinate him.

But you know all this Allan III.
 
No evidence exists Oswald fired a gun that day. The evidence shows he didn’t do it.

He was a patsy and that’s why your grandpa’s buddy Jack Ruby was hired to assassinate him.

But you know all this Allan III.
Well your a liar

I cited evidence and it proves her shot Kennedy

All you casn do is go " unnh unnh "

You know i own you and proved you a liar

I did that YEARS ago

Oswald killed kennedy alone YOU KNOW IT I bhave proven you a fool

EVERYONE knjows it and you are a laughing stock
 
Well your a liar

I cited evidence and it proves her shot Kennedy

All you casn do is go " unnh unnh "

You know i own you and proved you a liar

I did that YEARS ago

Oswald killed kennedy alone YOU KNOW IT I bhave proven you a fool

EVERYONE knjows it and you are a laughing stock
CIA cucksuckers lie all the time.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom