the people were right again: looks like there were 2 shooters that killed JFK

[Soupnazi630]

So you're thinking someone will go out of their way to ask what he is doing in his residence?

Again...that makes very little sense. Are you in the habit of questioning total strangers or co-workers on the off chance they may be planning an assassination.

Huh? What changed?

Yes you did:


View attachment 1080969


Please elaborate what doesn't fit. I agree it's conjecture on my part but please tell me what isn't addressed.


He absolutely did. He had money to take a cab to get both. It would take maybe an hour or two at most.

What prevented him from taking a cab to retreviing his pistol?

Someone will ask why he is carrying around something long in a paper bag.

At first yes he was not concerned with getting away but he was thinking about the consequences.

After he shot the president the situation changed. No he could not just take a cab to irving it would have attracted attention

attracting attention prevented him and soending the night with his family one last time

 

[gipper]

Someone will ask why he is carrying around something long in a paper bag.

At first yes he was not concerned with getting away but he was thinking about the consequences.

After he shot the president the situation changed. No he could not just take a cab to irving it would have attracted attention

attracting attention prevented him and soending the night with his family one last time

Except as you know, it was impossible for Oswald to do it. He was found in the second floor lunchroom literally minutes after the shooting casually drinking a soda. Who does that after committing the crime of the century.

No one heard anyone running down the stairs, yet many were in the building and all were on alert after the shooting.

Stop lying Nazi Allan.

 

[Shawnee_b]

JFK two shooters theory: files release could upend assassination details

Representative Anna Paulina Luna said Tuesday that she believes "two shooters" were involved in the assassination of former President John F. Kennedy.

www.newsweek.com

The classic reason why to not trust big government, as Democrats do.

rightwinger … you bought a clear hoax that was the Warren Commission. It looks like you were duped, despite the clear evidence that should have made you question it already.

The people deserve to know what their government does. It’s crazy that this is now a partisan issue.

It doesn't matter the truth finally came out, the same truth we knew and tried to tell the lame left ignoramuses for years. Their narrative will ALWAYS be the lone gunman Oswalt, period, forever, guarantee it. Just like for 32 years they still regularly spout Klinton was impeached for a blowjob, not lying and obstruction of justice. Old news right? 2 far leftists on different forums posted that less than a month ago, threads having nothing to do with the lying pedo.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

It's clear the evidence suggests that Oswald had help.

The evidence is incredibly weak that there were two shooters on the ground.

 

[candycorn]

Someone will ask why he is carrying around something long in a paper bag.

They did. He said it was curtain rods. Your bizarre assumption that someone will ask him what is a smaller package (a revolver) and he won't be able to come up with an answer is rather hilarious.

At first yes he was not concerned with getting away but he was thinking about the consequences.

WOW.... So he wasn't concerned with getting away before killing the President but something happened after he shot JFK that made him think about it? More hilarious.

After he shot the president the situation changed.

What had changed besides his shooting the President?

No he could not just take a cab to irving it would have attracted attention

sad.

attracting attention prevented him and soending the night with his family one last time

one last time? He could have done it days before...

 

[westwall]

I doubt she’s read the Warren report. Most conspiracists haven’t.

I have. I have a copy of it. It fails as a investigative report on many levels. Additionally, back in the 1970's IIRC, the House had a series of hearings and they concluded that there was at least one more shooter based on previously unavailable evidence.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

I have. I have a copy of it. It fails as an investigative report on many levels. Additionally, back in the 1970's IIRC, the House had a series of hearings and they concluded that there was at least one more shooter based on previously unavailable evidence.

They got the assassination part right.
What evidence proves another shooter? All the forensic evidence applicable to the actual assassination has been determined.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Except as you know, it was impossible for Oswald to do it. He was found in the second floor lunchroom literally minutes after the shooting casually drinking a soda. Who does that after committing the crime of the century.

No one heard anyone running down the stairs, yet many were in the building and all were on alert after the shooting.

Stop lying Nazi Allan.

Wrong the evidence proves he did

Anyone might do that

His presence drinking a soda is not proof of jack shit especially an impossibility as you claim

Not hearing something is proof of jack shit he had time to walk the distance you stupid ******* liar

IO am stating facts you are a ******* fool and liar

 

[Soupnazi630]

I have. I have a copy of it. It fails as a investigative report on many levels. Additionally, back in the 1970's IIRC, the House had a series of hearings and they concluded that there was at least one more shooter based on previously unavailable evidence.

You have never read it

You cannot point out any specific failures

The House select commitee had no new evidence and were proven wrong

 

[Soupnazi630]

They did. He said it was curtain rods. Your bizarre assumption that someone will ask him what is a smaller package (a revolver) and he won't be able to come up with an answer is rather hilarious.

WOW.... So he wasn't concerned with getting away before killing the President but something happened after he shot JFK that made him think about it? More hilarious.

What had changed besides his shooting the President?

sad.

one last time? He could have done it days before...

yes that was one person and he got away with it

Running around town would gave opened up to being asked again and again.

And you ignore that he wanted to spend the night with his family

Yes that is true in all likelyhood he was not concerned with getting away after the shooting

what had changed was that he had accomolished what he wanted to do and managed to briefly slip away

No he could not have done it days before. What is sad is the desperation of having nothing and gtrying to spin a conspiracy theory out of it

 

[gipper]

Wrong the evidence proves he did

Anyone might do that

His presence drinking a soda is not proof of jack shit especially an impossibility as you claim

Not hearing something is proof of jack shit he had time to walk the distance you stupid ******* liar

IO am stating facts you are a ******* fool and liar

Lol. Dumb as **** you Nazi ****.

No evidence exists proving Oswald did it. In fact, the evidence indicates it’s very likely he never fired a gun that day, but you know this.

Stop lying Allan Dulles III.

 

[candycorn]

yes that was one person and he got away with it

Running around town would gave opened up to being asked again and again.

And you ignore that he wanted to spend the night with his family

Yes that is true in all likelyhood he was not concerned with getting away after the shooting

what had changed was that he had accomolished what he wanted to do and managed to briefly slip away

No he could not have done it days before. What is sad is the desperation of having nothing and gtrying to spin a conspiracy theory out of it

Well, your answers have zero basis in reality if one takes even a cursory examination of the known facts of the day.

 

[candycorn]

They got the assassination part right.
What evidence proves another shooter? All the forensic evidence applicable to the actual assassination has been determined.

There is also that annoying fact of there being 2 hits on the President. If you have 2 (or more) snipers, they must have been the worst snipers available.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Lol. Dumb as **** you Nazi ****.

No evidence exists proving Oswald did it. In fact, the evidence indicates it’s very likely he never fired a gun that day, but you know this.

Stop lying Allan Dulles III.

yes it does you lying shit bag

We have massive evidence

Once again we have an eyewitness who saw him shoot the rifle at kennedy. There is no eyewitness who saw anyo else do it

We have his rifle with his prints and expended shells with his prints. we have ALL the bullets which match his rifle and no other rifle

You have jack shit

It is proven beyond question that the did and no evidence supports the crap you vomit

those are FACTS you are a filthy liar and traitor

 

[Soupnazi630]

Well, your answers have zero basis in reality if one takes even a cursory examination of the known facts of the day.

wrong my answers are informed and accurate yours is pure fantasy

The known facts disproves all conspiracy theories

you do not even grasp any of the known facts youare only partly informed about the subject

 

[Shawnee_b]

They got the assassination part right.
What evidence proves another shooter? All the forensic evidence applicable to the actual assassination has been determined.

Their forensic evidence is based on the magic bullet that changes directions and the back of his head blown out, as evident, if shot from the front.

 

[candycorn]

Their forensic evidence is based on the magic bullet that changes directions and the back of his head blown out, as evident, if shot from the front.

Except there is no entry wound on the front of his head.

You failed.

 

[candycorn]

wrong my answers are informed and accurate yours is pure fantasy

Your whole approach is that Oswald didn’t want to attract attention (as if he was going to be noticed) and that he didn’t have time to take a cab ride. Both statements of yours are idiotic.

The known facts disproves all conspiracy theories

Not even remotely true.

you do not even grasp any of the known facts youare only partly informed about the subject

I actually discussed the facts. You haven’t.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Their forensic evidence is based on the magic bullet that changes directions and the back of his head blown out, as evident, if shot from the front.

You believe that false narrative? OK.

 

[westwall]

They got the assassination part right.
What evidence proves another shooter? All the forensic evidence applicable to the actual assassination has been determined.

Except there is no entry wound on the front of his head.

You failed.

There is.