the people were right again: looks like there were 2 shooters that killed JFK

[Soupnazi630]

CIA cucksuckers lie all the time.

That makes you a CIA **********

 

[gipper]

That makes you a CIA **********

You’re grandpa was a Nazi too right?

 

[Soupnazi630]

You’re grandpa was a Nazi too right?

Still no evidence from your dumbass

 

[gipper]

Still no evidence from your dumbass

Post evidence Oswald did it or STFU.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Post evidence Oswald did it or STFU.

I did

You have no evidence of any kind and have never posted any

**** you boy I am in your face forever proving you a liar

 

[gipper]

I did

You have no evidence of any kind and have never posted any

**** you boy I am in your face forever proving you a liar

You posted obvious lies. There is no proof anywhere that Oswald killed JFK. ******* Nazi liar.

 

[BackAgain]

The evidence does indeed support the conclusuon that OSwald was the only shooter

Nope. Ignorant claim by you. Again.

There is no evidence of a conspiracy

You’ll never see what you refuse to look at, stupid.

It is not the least bit apparent he was shot fromthe front

Absolutely clear except to the willfully blind. You know. Suit for brain idiots like you.

The shot that killed Kennedy came from above and beind and there is no evidence to the contrary

Of course, as always, you’re wrong and full of shit.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Nope. Ignorant claim by you. Again.

You’ll never see what you refuse to look at, stupid.

Absolutely clear except to the willfully blind. You know. Suit for brain idiots like you.

Of course, as always, you’re wrong and full of shit.

wrong the evidence supports no other claim except oswald was the only shooter,

you have no eidence to the contrary.

You have no evidence to look at whateoever

It is clear he acted akone except for brainwashed fools like you who never looked at any evidence at all

I am correct and proving you wrong and everyone knows it

You have no evidence of any kind and you are a proven liar

 

[Soupnazi630]

You posted obvious lies. There is no proof anywhere that Oswald killed JFK. ******* Nazi liar.

Wrong

I posted facts YOU are the liar

You are a treasonous marxist ****** and inferior to me

 

[candycorn]

I’m glad you find humor in the truth.

I find humor in pointless humans such as yourself.

 

[candycorn]

Wrong

I don’t have time to explain cab rides to you.

Retrieving his rifle required explaining himself and waiting till an opportune moment.

Explaining himself to whom?

It also would have attracted attention which he wished to avoid

Attention from whom?

His wish was to kill the president and he was not concerned with getting away.

Of course..that is why he left the office, took a bus, took a cab, got his gun, shot a cop, and went to a theater. Amazing.

That concerne probably did change a little when he mangaed to slip out of the building. That was when he considered he pistol

Makes zero sense. Someone shoots the President and is “unconcerned” about the consequences? Nobody believes that.

you are completely grasping at weak straws

I admit my theory is conjecture. But it does address all of the known facts of that day and explains the actions of the principals involved.

 

[gipper]

Wrong

I posted facts YOU are the liar

You are a treasonous marxist ****** and inferior to me

I don’t have time to explain cab rides to you.

Explaining himself to whom?

Attention from whom?

Of course..that is why he left the office, took a bus, took a cab, got his gun, shot a cop, and went to a theater. Amazing.

Makes zero sense. Someone shoots the President and is “unconcerned” about the consequences? Nobody believes that.

I admit my theory is conjecture. But it does address all of the known facts of that day and explains the actions of the principals involved.

Oswald never fired a gun that day.

Do you always believe the lying criminal state just like Nazi Allan III?

 

[Failzero]

Doge stop lifelong payments to Families of the Perps involved in the Dallas ambush ?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Oswald never fired a gun that day.

Do you always believe the lying criminal state just like Nazi Allan III?

Candyass is also a shill from Langley same as Allan is as well is toddsterPARROT

 

[gipper]

Candyass is also a shill from Langley same as Allan is as well is toddsterPARROT

Probably! They make a strange trio.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Well DUH.

Oswald was a scapegoat. He must have been either a political prisoner, a lifer in prison, or an Oligarchy sacrfice to take the blame. And Ruby was set up to kill Oswald, just in case he decided to blab while in prison. They couldn't take that chance.

/—-/ I always thought that of Ruby.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Oswald never fired a gun that day.

Do you always believe the lying criminal state just like Nazi Allan III?

Yes he did and the evidence proves he did

You have no evidence to the contrary

 

[Soupnazi630]

I don’t have time to explain cab rides to you.

Explaining himself to whom?

Attention from whom?

Of course..that is why he left the office, took a bus, took a cab, got his gun, shot a cop, and went to a theater. Amazing.

Makes zero sense. Someone shoots the President and is “unconcerned” about the consequences? Nobody believes that.

I admit my theory is conjecture. But it does address all of the known facts of that day and explains the actions of the principals involved.

explaining it to anyone who asked.

Attention from cab drivers and his fellow employees at TSBD and his boarding house landlord.

When he left the building and took a cab the he had accompolished what he set out to do so the circumstances had changed

I never said he was inconcerned about consequences. He was fatalistic about until he slipped out of the building.

No it does not address the facts


His actions were already explained. The pistol was unimportant the rifle ewas important he did not have time or opporunity to retrieve both

 

[candycorn]

explaining it to anyone who asked.

So you're thinking someone will go out of their way to ask what he is doing in his residence?

Attention from cab drivers and his fellow employees at TSBD and his boarding house landlord.

Again...that makes very little sense. Are you in the habit of questioning total strangers or co-workers on the off chance they may be planning an assassination.

When he left the building and took a cab the he had accompolished what he set out to do so the circumstances had changed

Huh? What changed?

I never said he was inconcerned about consequences. He was fatalistic about until he slipped out of the building.

Yes you did:

No it does not address the facts

Please elaborate what doesn't fit. I agree it's conjecture on my part but please tell me what isn't addressed.

His actions were already explained. The pistol was unimportant the rifle ewas important he did not have time or opporunity to retrieve both

He absolutely did. He had money to take a cab to get both. It would take maybe an hour or two at most.

What prevented him from taking a cab to retreviing his pistol?

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Probably! They make a strange trio.

Yeah what they all have in common is they are incapable of opening up their mouths without shitting all over the floor a common theme of shills from Langley