Wow the uninformed.they were either compromised with dirt that would be released about them as was the case with McConnell who we now know was getting it in with Epstein,or they had death threats issued to their familys as many of the whistleblowers and some of trumps lawyers did,grow up.No but the prosecutor presented enough evidence with a grand jury for them to decide it was enough to proceed with a trial.The courts, 60 of them, would be a prime indicator but that's just me.
OK Shithead, tell us how you know the election fraud claims are baseless!
Courts? A prime indicator?
So when courts couldn't convict John Gotti of racketeering, that meant he was innocent? When courts looked the other way for years when southern racists would string up blacks from trees and hang them, and dismiss it all as "boys just out for a good time," that too was OK? No crime to see here?
I've already told you FIVE times that the courts side stepped the issue not wanting to come between the election boards and the voters. They didn't want their families threatened, their homes attacked, riots in the streets and everything else for overturning an election and be accused of picking a president.
Don't you think they would have been targeted by Gotti or the jurors in the trial, that convicted him?
60 judges sidestepped the issue because they were scared?