The Overturning of Roe v Wade

badger2

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2016
Messages
7,180
Reaction score
541
Points
140
In post #23, the idea is giving more rights to the fetus than the mother, but there is never an instant when the DNA of the fetus is not alive, which is a constitutional contradiction. The life of the fetus is always already preemptively living, even before conception, even as it lives in schizoid contemplation of adjoinment.
 

JoeB131

Diamond Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
126,979
Reaction score
13,102
Points
2,220
Location
Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
In post #23, the idea is giving more rights to the fetus than the mother, but there is never an instant when the DNA of the fetus is not alive, which is a constitutional contradiction. The life of the fetus is always already preemptively living, even before conception, even as it lives in schizoid contemplation of adjoinment.
Okay, that made little or no sense.

Again, it's not just the questionable issue of giving rights to fetuses, it's taking rights away from women. It's essentially letting a fetus hold her hostage for nine months of her life.
 

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top