The Overlap between antisemitism and anti-Zionism

In general, yes. You have to understand that some young kid doesn't understand the world or history, they are sponges, easily influences and misguided. This is why undercover police in Canada like to entrap and target teenagers, it's like taking candy from a baby.
Yes, but often the professors and administrators are in support. At UCLA, the university paid for the barriers for the “No Jew Zones.”
 
This thread should have been title "why it's important for my zionist agenda to convince people that Jewish people are the same as child slaughtering zionists"
 
Arguing with a dork like that is giving credence to ignorance.
I think he’s doing such a good job of illustrating the overlap between hating Israel and antisemitism, that people will think I put him up to it!
 
This thread should have been title "why it's important for my zionist agenda to convince people that Jewish people are the same as child slaughtering zionists"
See? ^^^ He’s still at it. The only Jews he doesn’t hate are the rare ones who don’t think Israel should exist.
 
Yes, but often the professors and administrators are in support. At UCLA, the university paid for the barriers for the “No Jew Zones.”
What in the....Such a "zone" exists?

You must be lying. Please provide a link
 
What in the....Such a "zone" exists?

You must be lying. Please provide a link
This is the case about it: they were called Jewish Exclusion Zones, and the administration allowed them to remain up for a full week.

 
This is the case about it: they were called Jewish Exclusion Zones, and the administration allowed them to remain up for a full week.

These people have lost their minds. This is mid 1930s Germany type stuff, wow.
 
15th post
He’s messing up my thread with his antisemitic Jew-libel.
The problem is this broad characterization of a subset of Jews as "child-slaughterers". (And how quickly it went THERE!) He is complaining that we are conflating all Jews with these "child-slaughterers" and we are thus tainting the "decent Jews" with the evil of the "child-slaughterers". Leaving aside that HE was the one who introduced "child-slaughtering" to the conversation, and so casually as to present it as a self-evident truth rather than the blood libel it is, HE is the one who is conflating "child-slaughterer" with Jewishness, as though "child-slaughter" was a Jewish trait, but only in the not-decent, animal ones. He is the one creating the subset and labelling that Jewish subset as "Zionist", a term which is unequivocally associated with Jewishness. If he wanted to discuss "people who slaughter children" or "people who derive joy from the slaughter of children", he could just say that. And he would not find any on this thread. Instead, he assigns that trait to everyone who he identifies as "Zionist (Jew)".

Not only do I feel as though "Zionist" is term with no utility in conversation, it has become a racial slur.
 
The problem is this broad characterization of a subset of Jews as "child-slaughterers". (And how quickly it went THERE!) He is complaining that we are conflating all Jews with these "child-slaughterers" and we are thus tainting the "decent Jews" with the evil of the "child-slaughterers". Leaving aside that HE was the one who introduced "child-slaughtering" to the conversation, and so casually as to present it as a self-evident truth rather than the blood libel it is, HE is the one who is conflating "child-slaughterer" with Jewishness, as though "child-slaughter" was a Jewish trait, but only in the not-decent, animal ones. He is the one creating the subset and labelling that Jewish subset as "Zionist", a term which is unequivocally associated with Jewishness. If he wanted to discuss "people who slaughter children" or "people who derive joy from the slaughter of children", he could just say that. And he would not find any on this thread. Instead, he assigns that trait to everyone who he identifies as "Zionist (Jew)".

Not only do I feel as though "Zionist" is term with no utility in conversation, it has become a racial slur.
Absolutely, and that was my point in the OP about the use of the word “Zionist” as a way of casting dispersions (to put it mildly) on a large subset of Jews - a majority in fact - and then falsely attributing to them such awful traits as “enjoying child slaughter” - all while avoiding the word “Jew.”
 
Absolutely, and that was my point in the OP about the use of the word “Zionist” as a way of casting dispersions (to put it mildly) on a large subset of Jews - a majority in fact - and then falsely attributing to them such awful traits as “enjoying child slaughter” - all while avoiding the word “Jew.”
I believe you have had your claim fully proven.
 
Back
Top Bottom