Supreme Court Enshrines Trump's Racist Bulls-t Into Law

Status
Not open for further replies.

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
12,048
Reaction score
16,340
Points
2,415
It was a bad, bad week for immigrants at the nation’s highest court, a naked display of power and xenophobia where the Supreme Court conservatives started with their—well, President Donald Trump’s—desired result and worked backward.

In a brutal series of 6-3 decisions, the conservatives upended settled law in favor of making Trump’s brutal anti-immigrant crackdown the law of the land. In the ruling, Justice Samuel Alito goes through a tortured bad-faith reading of immigration statutes to get to his decision that the administration doesn’t need to process asylum claims if it doesn’t feel like it.

Here’s how Alito got there.


 
It was a bad, bad week for immigrants at the nation’s highest court, a naked display of power and xenophobia where the Supreme Court conservatives started with their—well, President Donald Trump’s—desired result and worked backward.

In a brutal series of 6-3 decisions, the conservatives upended settled law in favor of making Trump’s brutal anti-immigrant crackdown the law of the land. In the ruling, Justice Samuel Alito goes through a tortured bad-faith reading of immigration statutes to get to his decision that the administration doesn’t need to process asylum claims if it doesn’t feel like it.

Here’s how Alito got there.




It was a bad, bad week for immigrants illegal aliens.
 
It was a bad, bad week for immigrants at the nation’s highest court, a naked display of power and xenophobia where the Supreme Court conservatives started with their—well, President Donald Trump’s—desired result and worked backward.

In a brutal series of 6-3 decisions, the conservatives upended settled law in favor of making Trump’s brutal anti-immigrant crackdown the law of the land. In the ruling, Justice Samuel Alito goes through a tortured bad-faith reading of immigration statutes to get to his decision that the administration doesn’t need to process asylum claims if it doesn’t feel like it.

Here’s how Alito got there.



Too bad Skrewy--SCOTUS knows volumes more than you ever will, so STFU. You've been whining for years about election deniers--now practice what you preach and accept the decision of the highest court in the land.
 
Too bad Skrewy--SCOTUS knows volumes more than you ever will, so STFU. You've been whining for years about election deniers--now practice what you preach and accept the decision of the highest court in the land.
Do they? Do you mean this sc, or the sc in general? Because I would love to debate that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom