frigidweirdo
Diamond Member
- Mar 7, 2014
- 57,188
- 16,796
- 2,180
"Online posts that claim the United Kingdom has the highest per capita rape rate among the world's developed economies are missing key context, including that rape in the UK is defined more broadly than in many other countries."
The UK and the US both have rape. But rape isn't just "rape".
The UK and US define rape completely differently. But people will still look at the statistics and point to the UK and say "look, the UK has higher rape rates, the US is better, probably because of our guns" even though Alaska, with loads of guns, has the highest rape rate in the US. (148.7 per 100,000 or 118.4 per 100,000 depending on which site you look at. Either way Arkansas is second with 72.3 or 77.2 per 100,000)
Rape Statistics by State 2026
Discover population, economy, health, and more with the most comprehensive global statistics at your fingertips.
But we can see this for real in a case of a US pilot who raped a woman in the UK, but didn't get punished for rape under the US military "justice" system.
‘Degrading’: why did a US fighter pilot avoid British trial after strangling a woman in England?
Jacob Wulfson’s fellow airmen decided his fate after a court martial at RAF Lakenheath – a distressing week for Sarah Steele, the academic he assaulted
"In the criminal justice system for England and Wales, Wulfson's trial would probably have been held at the city's crown court, and the alleged offence categorised as rape. A jury of ordinary citizens – men and women – would have heard the case. If found guilty, a judge would have decided the sentence."
"However, Wulfson's case was tried at a court martial on a US airbase, despite his alleged crime taking place while he was off duty and in an English city. The proceedings followed US military law, and the offence was not charged as rape but as sexual assault and "aggravated sexual contact"."
This is why the US has a lower rape rate than the UK, not because there's less rape, but because the US doesn't care to make a lot of these cases "rape".
"In Wulfson's case, the jury found him guilty of strangling Steele, but not guilty of penetrating her vagina without her consent."
Not only that, he didn't even get found guilty of "aggravated sexual contact", when had he been tried, would probably have been found guilty (opinion, no fact).
