The Optics Of Trying To Remove Trump From Office

[postman]

Didn't the Democrats claim the election was fraudulent in 2016?

NOPE.

 

[Slyhunter]

Did they? What did they say was fraudulent about it?

Stolen, Fraudulent, same thing.

Fact-check: Did Democrats suggest 2016 presidential election was stolen?

Many prominent Democrats say Donald Trump's win in the 2016 presidential election was tainted.

www.statesman.com

Trump's Electoral College Victory Challenged by Dems

A member of Congress needs at least one U.S. senator to back the objection and suspend the joint session.

www.newsweek.com

And then they constantly worked to sabotage his efforts at doing his agenda his entire 4 years in office.

 

[Marener]

because it was a federal election that was being questioned?

Apparently not. It’s Georgia’s election. The letter explains that.

The DoJ wasn’t questioning the election at all.

 

[22lcidw]

When Trump told the DoJ to publish a letter saying the election was fraudulent despite having no evidence of it, you think they should have done it. Right?

There is evidence its just smoothed over. You can end it y changing the voting. You will not because you use it to your advantage. Every election cycles the nation will slowly become as the worst who vote. There is no advantage to being the best in a system that rewards people according to culture, gender, etc. We are seeing it. And denial is all around, or the good employment not really earned is too good to pass up. We are spending 2.3 billion dollars for a destroyer that has a 40-year-old hull design. Spending half that much is reasonable. We do not design a new hull design competently and efficiently at this point for classes of ships.

 

[postman]

All the letter asks for is a special session of the Georgia legislature to address fraud concerns.

Only after stopping the certification.

 

[Slyhunter]

Dead people and illegal aliens vote Democrat.

 

[hadit]

No different than Richard Nixon.

He was removed when his own party informed him he'd either resign or be impeached. Kind of like how Quid Pro Joe was only removed from the campaign when his own party kicked him out.

 

[Marener]

Stolen, Fraudulent, same thing.

Absolutely not. What did Dems actually complain about? Did they say the votes were illegal? Did they try to take away votes?

 

[postman]

We are spending 2.3 billion dollars for a destroyer that has a 40-year-old hull design. Spending half that much is reasonable. We do not design a new hull design competently and efficiently at this point for classes of ships.

It's cheaper to build from a proven design, than to R&D a whole new class of ship, that has to be proven to work.

Look at the problems they're having with the Gerald Ford class aircraft carriers.

 

[postman]

Absolutely not. What did Dems actually complain about? Did they say the votes were illegal? Did they try to take away votes?

When will these people read a dictionary.

 

[The Duke]

OK, so it is starting to look like it is very possible that Trump will not only win the electoral college but may win the popular vote as well. This means that a majority of voters will have elected Trump knowing that democrats have convicted him 34 times (and wanting more) and have also accused him of being a danger to the country and wants to take democracy away.

A majority of voters would have elected Trump, knowing all that before voting. So, they either decided that they know democrats have weaponized the legal system against Trump for political purposes, or have decided that they actually prefer a 34 times convicted felon who is a danger to the country and will take democracy away to Kamala Harris.

So, what are the optics if democrats try to remove Trump from the presidency if the majority of voters (AKA the popular vote) voted him into office knowing all this before they voted?

Don't care. If they wanna start some shit, that's fine. There's guys that have been waiting for this since 1775.

 

[The Duke]

H.Res.57 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

Summary of H.Res.57 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors.

www.congress.gov

H.Res.57 - Impeaching Joseph R. Biden, President of the United States, for abuse of power by enabling bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. 117th Congress (2021-2022)

Sponsor: Rep. Greene, Marjorie Taylor [R-GA-14] (Introduced 01/21/2021)

Well she ain't wrong. Joe Biden took bribes for 50 years or more, ya asshat.

 

[martybegan]

Apparently not. It’s Georgia’s election. The letter explains that.

The DoJ wasn’t questioning the election at all.

It's a federal election run by Georgia.

Are you saying the Voting Right's act gives the DOJ no power to oversee elections inside a given State?

 

[martybegan]

Only after stopping the certification.

And all it did was ask. Georgia could and did say no.

 

[Independent thinker]

Dead people and illegal aliens vote Democrat.

Yeah, they don't seem to ever vote Republican, do they?

 

[The Duke]

It's a federal election run by Georgia.

Are you saying the Voting Right's act gives the DOJ no power to oversee elections inside a given State?

Oh, they're taking it over from a sheriff somewhere that said he would use his department to supervise it.
I trust them about as far as I can throw them, and that ain't far.

 

[rampart]

OK, so it is starting to look like it is very possible that Trump will not only win the electoral college but may win the popular vote as well. This means that a majority of voters will have elected Trump knowing that democrats have convicted him 34 times (and wanting more) and have also accused him of being a danger to the country and wants to take democracy away.

A majority of voters would have elected Trump, knowing all that before voting. So, they either decided that they know democrats have weaponized the legal system against Trump for political purposes, or have decided that they actually prefer a 34 times convicted felon who is a danger to the country and will take democracy away to Kamala Harris.

So, what are the optics if democrats try to remove Trump from the presidency if the majority of voters (AKA the popular vote) voted him into office knowing all this before they voted?

1. trump will never win the popular vote, and probably not the electoral either. trump 47 will owe his office to the congress and supreme court.

but when vance and the bros call amendment 25 on his fat ass, do not blame the dems,

 

[ozro]

NOPE.

First impeachment of Donald Trump - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

From the link:
"Congress's first efforts to impeach Trump were initiated by Democratic representatives Al Green and Brad Sherman in 2017.[13] In December 2017, an impeachment resolution failed in the House with a 58–364 vote margin. Following the 2018 elections, the Democrats gained a majority in the House and launched multiple investigations into Trump's actions and finances.[14] Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi initially resisted calls for impeachment. In May 2019, however, she indicated that Trump's continued actions, which she characterized as obstruction of justice and refusal to honor Congressional subpoenas, might make an impeachment inquiry necessary.[15][16]"

Some Dems were publicly speaking of impeachment before Trump took off.
Less than a month after he took offe, on 2/17/2017, articles of impeachment were filed

 

[martybegan]

1. trump will never win the popular vote, and probably not the electoral either. trump 47 will owe his office to the congress and supreme court.

but when vance and the bros call amendment 25 on his fat ass, do not blame the dems,

Re-secure your tinfoil hat, the SJW twat waves are starting to get through it.

 

[Marener]

It's a federal election run by Georgia.

Are you saying the Voting Right's act gives the DOJ no power to oversee elections inside a given State?

The voting rights act was gutted by SCOTUS on those grounds.

The letter explains that the Georgia legislature determines who gets the electoral votes and tells them to convene a special session for “reasons” that have nothing to do with the DoJ.

You think the AG should have signed and sent the letter despite not agreeing with anything it says, right?