Marener
Diamond Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 45,845
- 19,978
- 2,173
Can you steal an election by engaging in free speech?No, the problem for you is that I know what real legitimate elections look like.
2020 was not that.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you steal an election by engaging in free speech?No, the problem for you is that I know what real legitimate elections look like.
2020 was not that.
Not when it comes to voter fraud.That doesn't invalidate my point to Moron-er that the Feds can have input into State elections of a federal nature, and even State level elections themselves.
Um, that's how things are supposed to work in our society.
Well, the letter basically was saying the legislature should disregard the votes of Georgia and appoint new electors for Trump. So that doesn’t seem very democratic to me.In this specific case of your side's hemming and hawing about "ruining democracy"
I would have if I was the AG. There was nothing illegal in that letter.
Of course that is what it means if Trum legitimately and honestly wins.If I understand you correctly, you're saying that if Trump wins in 2024 then voters prefer Trump to democrats.
That's how Trump feels.No, the problem for you is that I know what real legitimate elections look like.
2020 was not that.
Not when it comes to voter fraud.
DOJ doesn't tell states what crimes to prosecute. Or what situations to investigate.
Well, the letter basically was saying the legislature should disregard the votes of Georgia and appoint new electors for Trump. So that doesn’t seem very democratic to me.
Do you think the AG was wrong to refuse to send the letter given he didn’t agree with the contents of it?
It violates the 10th amendment.In this specific case of your side's hemming and hawing about "ruining democracy"
I would have if I was the AG. There was nothing illegal in that letter.
Truth makes any Trump election unfair.Can you steal an election by engaging in free speech?
The fraud that the DoJ couldn’t find?If they met, deliberated, and found fraud. you left that part out.
If he didn't want to, he should have resigned.
It violates the 10th amendment.
The fraud that the DoJ couldn’t find?
You have stated that government officials should do whatever the president orders them to do. Sending that letter would have been absolutely corrupt n
You left out they asked they delay the certification.In this case all they ask was for the legislature to hold a session to investigate.
You left out they asked they delay the certification.
Maybe you don't remember how many in the Trump administration resigned after January 6thIf he didn't want to, he should have resigned.
States run elections.Explain how it violates the 10th Amendment?
Yep. You did.Not surprising in the short timeframe given between the election and the certification mandates.
I have stated no such thing. Executive officials occupy their offices at the behest of the President, if they want to refuse to perform a legal action, they can resign.
No, I want them to follow the lawful directions of the ELECTED President.
You want unelected bureaucrats to have veto power over an elected official.
But they were refusing to perform an ILLEGAL act.Not surprising in the short timeframe given between the election and the certification mandates.
I have stated no such thing. Executive officials occupy their offices at the behest of the President, if they want to refuse to perform a legal action, they can resign.
It also said that the fake electors transmitted their ballots and so that’s something they have to work with.You left out they asked they delay the certification.
Hey, all Harvey Weinstein did was "ASK"Asked.