The Optics Of Trying To Remove Trump From Office

I think there was fraud, and when people do bad things, they try not to leave evidence of it lying around for everyone to find.
Did you think O.J. was guilty? Or, Michael Jackson was a Pedo, not some poor guy who never had a childhood and was trying to have something he missed?
 
Did you think O.J. was guilty? Or, Michael Jackson was a Pedo, not some poor guy who never had a childhood and was trying to have something he missed?

yes he was.

MJ was a sick man, and even if sick it still made him a kid diddler.
 
yes he was.

MJ was a sick man, and even if sick it still made him a kid diddler.
I don't think it was anything sexual. If it was, there would be a ton of, now adults, suing his estate. And there aren't any. Not even Mcaulik Hogan.

He was a sick man trying to use his fortune to have the childhood he never had.
 
I don't think it was anything sexual. If it was, there would be a ton of, now adults, suing his estate. And there aren't any. Not even Mcaulik Hogan.

He was a sick man trying to use his fortune to have the childhood he never had.

And that included sexual things with young boys apparently.
 
OK, so it is starting to look like it is very possible that Trump will not only win the electoral college but may win the popular vote as well. This means that a majority of voters will have elected Trump knowing that democrats have convicted him 34 times (and wanting more) and have also accused him of being a danger to the country and wants to take democracy away.

A majority of voters would have elected Trump, knowing all that before voting. So, they either decided that they know democrats have weaponized the legal system against Trump for political purposes, or have decided that they actually prefer a 34 times convicted felon who is a danger to the country and will take democracy away to Kamala Harris.

So, what are the optics if democrats try to remove Trump from the presidency if the majority of voters (AKA the popular vote) voted him into office knowing all this before they voted?
They will kill him if he wins. That's the reason for the dangerous rhetoric.
 
They will kill him if he wins. That's the reason for the dangerous rhetoric.
While it is an EXTREMELY unlikely scenario, there is always a chance that the EC will wind up in a tie. If so, the newly elected House would elect the president and, even if Democrats take control of the House back, Trump would probably win the presidency according to the rules. However, even though Republicans are pretty much a sure bet to retake control of the Senate, if Democrats actually keep the Senate, then it is highly likely that Trump would then be the president and Walz would be his VP. Under that scenario, there will be no holds barred in "getting Trump", no matter what form that would take.
 
Back
Top Bottom