Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They all know that I am correct and you are lying. They know you were crushed used and humilaited with facts,.Anyone reading this knows otherwise.
After 7:00 they illustrate the engineering, clearly showing how the inner core columns were the main load-bearers. .
Rinse. Wash. Repeat.And once again more videos which prove nothing and more referrences from the discredited group AE911 truth.
All massively debunked over and obver yet still you repeat yourself hoping to hide how you got crushed
That is your game not mine.Rinse. Wash. Repeat.And once again more videos which prove nothing and more referrences from the discredited group AE911 truth.
All massively debunked over and obver yet still you repeat yourself hoping to hide how you got crushed
You're good .
Who needs your opinion ?videos which have been proven fiction.
Those were facts not opinion.Who needs your opinion ?videos which have been proven fiction.
Let people decide for themselves......they're looking. Most scared to speak up but they're listening.
Or the fact that no steel high-rise ever collapsed due to fire........ until 9/11.It’s the crux of the 9/11 coverup commission that none of these shills have ever been able to get around.
Not before or since.
View attachment 456070
You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
I see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
So you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing mdelting steel was a lie and proven soI see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
Anyway, do you believe that Gerry Fornino exists?
No, what's been proven is that in order for you to maintain your ignorance, you have to pretend that Gerry Fornino doesn't exist. When you fail to acknowledge the existence of someone who proves my point, that means that you're in denial.So you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing mdelting steel was a lie and proven soI see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
Anyway, do you believe that Gerry Fornino exists?
I never said he does not exist,No, what's been proven is that in order for you to maintain your ignorance, you have to pretend that Gerry Fornino doesn't exist. When you fail to acknowledge the existence of someone who proves my point, that means that you're in denial.So you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing mdelting steel was a lie and proven soI see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
Anyway, do you believe that Gerry Fornino exists?
So just for the record, do you think Gerry Fornino is a figment of my imagination?
Alright! So now that we've established that you understand that Gerry Fornino exists, let's find out whether or not you believe he has said what he said.I never said he does not exist,No, what's been proven is that in order for you to maintain your ignorance, you have to pretend that Gerry Fornino doesn't exist. When you fail to acknowledge the existence of someone who proves my point, that means that you're in denial.So you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing mdelting steel was a lie and proven soI see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
Anyway, do you believe that Gerry Fornino exists?
So just for the record, do you think Gerry Fornino is a figment of my imagination?
You are lying and of course yoy wish to hide from the fact that you have been proven wrong about people seeing melting steel.
You KNOW that your first claim of people seeing melting steel has been debunked and proven a lie. Acknowledge that fact and then we can move on.
No you are lying.Alright! So now that we've established that you understand that Gerry Fornino exists, let's find out whether or not you believe he has said what he said.I never said he does not exist,No, what's been proven is that in order for you to maintain your ignorance, you have to pretend that Gerry Fornino doesn't exist. When you fail to acknowledge the existence of someone who proves my point, that means that you're in denial.So you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing mdelting steel was a lie and proven soI see.No I did make a point and it was a factual point. LARAM is by definition the proof you are wrong and defeated when he comes in on your side.You forgot to make a point. I guess I should first ask you whether or not you believe Gerry Fornino exists. So, how about it? Does he exist?You are the shill and yes choking on facts.Yeah, and it's choking on the feed as we speak.You are feeding a sock puppet shill.First you said that no steel had melted, and now you want to amend that statement? Okay, so how hot did it get in the pile of rubble? And how much melted steel was found?Are you the one who started out saying that no steel melted?Hmm. Someone said that there was evidence of melted steel. Another poster said there was none. I found a statement from a structural engineer and professor, and an FBI bomb technician who saw a handgun melted into a blob.Okay, let's say he was not a lead investigator. Now, do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?Just another of many engineers who helped investigate.Abolhassan Astaneh-Asl (Persian: ابوالحسن آستانهاصل ; born 1947 in Tabriz) is an Iranian -American academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley. He was one of the leading structural engineers to investigate the collapse of the World Trade Center towers on the September 11 attacks.It proves you are lying as he was no such thing,Do you believe that if he is not the lead investigator, nothing he said is correct?Wow! You just deny everything and then hope no one can back up what they say. You should have researched what I had told you. Now you're stuck in a corner.No I am not.You're a fukcing hair-trigger, ain't ya? If you slow down just a little, you'll recall that I have put forth no theory. Nor did I post any pictures. That's all in your mind. Your problem is that when you are angry, you become incapable of making a point, and you even recall things that didn't happen.Fire ahead and prove it. Even if someone did see it such a thing would be absolutely irrelevant. The picgture you showed of molten sgteel was NOT specifically steel. Any number of flammable materials could burn that way and such buildings as the towers would have endless flammable materials.Before I prove to you that such things as a handgun melted into a blob are a reality, I'd like to hear you say one more time that no one saw any such thing.No one saw any of that or any melted steel.And jet fuel cannot melt steel.If I might interject here, I do recall hearing about steel that had melted sometime that day.
And I'm pretty sure that some guy said that he had seen the melting of girders, too.
Funny story though
When you do, I'll show you that it's true, and you can maybe for the first time in hour life ask yourself why you make statements before finding out if they're true or not. And then I'll be asking myself why I would engage you in debate when I'll have to fact check everything you say to make sure you're not lying.
So, why don't you say that there's no such thing? Go ahead . . . fish.
You have nothing.
Anyway, one of the lead investigators into the collapses said he saw melting of girders at the WTC. Wonder why he would say such a thing unless . . .
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Here's something from a guy named Gerry Fornino. He was an FBI bomb technician.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
You are an overly sensitive fool who is supporting idiiotic theories even if you never stated one.
You stated you would offer proof. You did not. A quote which YOU typed is worthless.
Anyways no one said any such thing LIAR
Here is a video of a lead investigator saying that he saw melting of girders at WTC:
9/11: FEMA investigator Abolhassan Astaneh says, "melting of girders" in WTC - Bing video
So, now that you've made a fool of yourself, are you still going to deny it?
Hey, did you happen to google Gerry Fornino? Do you believe he exists? Do you really doubt that he said exactly what I quoted him as saying? Be careful, you could lose what's left of your credibility.
LOLOL. He wasn't a "lead investigator".
What was he?
And are you, too, going to deny the existence of Gerry Fornino and what he said?
He was not a lead investigator.
One stupid lie from you at a time do not try to distract from your idiotic spin by naming someone else.
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Do you under stand that the building was a willow reed? It was NOT brick and mortar... The floors were cantilevered off central core like spokes.. Like the ribs of an umbrella... and it had an aluminum skin. I knew as soon as the planes hit the buildings would collapse.
What does telling me about the "skin" of the building have to do with this?
Do you believe that an academic, structural engineer and professor at University of California, Berkeley did not know what melt means?
And what about Gerry Fornino? I get the feeling that if he wasn't the "lead" FBI bomb technician, you'd use that as proof that he didn't say what he said, or that it wasn't true. Am I right?
Steel girders don't melt, but their integrity is compromised when they get hot enough to sag.
They CAN melt but did not on that day. Whether it was girders or some other pieces of steel some melted steel was found at the bottom of the rubble once the clean up neared the end.
Of course it was still hot. Because it was melted from being at tne bottom of that pit covered with debris. Some what similar to a kiln or blacksmiths forge.
Twoofers ignore the details and scream endlessly about jet fuel not being hot enough to melt steel which is true. They ignore that the jet fuel only started a fire and it grew hot enough to cause the steel supports to lose over half of their strength and sag as you pointed out. When they could no longer support the weight they collapsed exactly as physics dictates that they should
You mean a week later underneath all the debris? Do you have a college education?
whenever LARAM weighs in it is proof positive you have been humiliated and crushed with facts,
Since you are so determined to change the subject you acknowledge that your stupid claim of people seeing melting steel has been crushed and debunked.
Anyway, do you believe that Gerry Fornino exists?
So just for the record, do you think Gerry Fornino is a figment of my imagination?
You are lying and of course yoy wish to hide from the fact that you have been proven wrong about people seeing melting steel.
You KNOW that your first claim of people seeing melting steel has been debunked and proven a lie. Acknowledge that fact and then we can move on.
"The things of interest that we'd find would be some of the parts of the plane embedded in the cars and in places in which you just wouldn't expect. Um, a part of the fins off one of the turbines off one of the engines was actually found embedded in one of the engine blocks of one of the cars. But I think the most unique thing about this investigation has just been the unbelievable damage; the levels of heat in which in certain instances firearms were found in some of the vehicles that had completely melted down, and the temperatures that we were told were in the area of three to four thousand degrees, that they melted a steel revolver down into a blob of metal again . . ."
If you have reason to doubt that that's exactly what he said, make your case.
Also, you're going on about how my first claim was that people saw melting steel. You're editing the past again. But in case you think I'm kidding about that, show me where I said that anyone saw melting steel.
