The Official USMB Inauguration Thread - President Donald Trump #47

Yep, they try to overthrow the government like you do. :)
If Republicans wanted to overthrow the government....as in an insurrection...
They would have brought guns...
As in a LOT of guns and ammunition.

There are hundreds of millions of Firearms in America as it is our 2nd ammendment right to possess them. And Republicans have a special penchant for the 2nd ammendment.

So excuse the thunderous roar of laughter every time you communist Democrats say such things....

If you want to really see an insurrection....just cheat at elections again.
 
If Republicans wanted to overthrow the government....as in an insurrection...
They would have brought guns...
As in a LOT of guns and ammunition.

There are hundreds of millions of Firearms in America as it is our 2nd ammendment right to possess them. And Republicans have a special penchant for the 2nd ammendment.

So excuse the thunderous roar of laughter every time you communist Democrats say such things....

If you want to really see an insurrection....just cheat at elections again.
Even the law, that had all the tools, NEVER charged any protestors for insurrection.
The weapon they tell us were those broomstick mounts for flags. And of course after the cops blasted the crowd using flash bangs, the crowd was ushered by cops into the Capitol building. Windows busted they tell us.

Strange story given the windows on the outside were bomb proofed after 911 happened.

4 windows still not bomb proofed were the broken windows on the outside of the building. I think what confused them is 2 men beat windows in a hallway.
 
Last edited:
You know Foxfyre, in the United States one would expect citizens to value others who are still citizens when in the womb. The party in the womb is on the path to being an adult citizen over time.
The problem is that the Constitution does not acknowledge the unborn as citizens and that is for good reason.

So it really comes down to human values, conscience, culture, sense of right and wrong.

Not a single one of us exists who did not go through the complete process of egg fertilization and all the other steps of how a person develops and becomes able to live in the world on his/her own initiative.

As far as viability goes, there is no difference between the unborn at any stage and the many months/years the infant outside the womb is entirely dependent on others in order to live. In both cases we are dealing with a human life.

Because a substantial majority of Americans (and probably Canadians) believe that, it is reasonable and ethical for the people's representatives to impose reasonable regulation on abortion. But it is also unscientific and I think unethical to take the position that for almost all purposes, an abortion is never the right/ethical/moral choice too.

There has to be common sense applied.

There are a few on the right and almost all on the left who refuse to apply that common sense. No doubt at least some of the protests will reflect that.
 
Foxfyre is very intelligent and has no reading problems of any kind.
Why did you have problems reading her?
It's not just him. They have trouble reading women because they have a hard time telling what one is.
 
The problem is that the Constitution does not acknowledge the unborn as citizens and that is for good reason.

So it really comes down to human values, conscience, culture, sense of right and wrong.

Not a single one of us exists who did not go through the complete process of egg fertilization and all the other steps of how a person develops and becomes able to live in the world on his/her own initiative.

As far as viability goes, there is no difference between the unborn at any stage and the many months/years the infant outside the womb is entirely dependent on others in order to live. In both cases we are dealing with a human life.

Because a substantial majority of Americans (and probably Canadians) believe that, it is reasonable and ethical for the people's representatives to impose reasonable regulation on abortion. But it is also unscientific and I think unethical to take the position that for almost all purposes, an abortion is never the right/ethical/moral choice too.

There has to be common sense applied.

There are a few on the right and almost all on the left who refuse to apply that common sense. No doubt at least some of the protests will reflect that.
Let's get up to date.

Prosecutions for murdering a fetus, also known as fetal homicide, can occur when someone is charged with causing the death of an unborn child. The punishment for this crime is usually the same as if the injury or death happened to the mother.

Federal law
  • The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 protects unborn infants from violence and murder.

  • The federal criminal statutes incorporate the common law “born alive” rule. However, advances in science and medicine have made this rule obsolete.

State laws
  • Some states have laws that authorize homicide charges for causing a pregnancy loss.

  • For example, New Hampshire passed a bill in 2017 that defines a fetus as a person for purposes of criminal prosecution of murder.
 
The problem is that the Constitution does not acknowledge the unborn as citizens and that is for good reason.
It might be over voting. But think it over. When can a citizen vote? At 18 years of age. So those supporting abortion should expect us to claim they murder humans who can't vote either.
 
A retaliatory incursion?

Is that modern Liberish for rape, beheadings, and cold blooded murder of infants?
Keep your Zionist propaganda to yourself.

Having served "practically" in the SADF for 4 years in SWA and other places, I can assure you 100%, a baby nor it's parents care if the baby was ripped apart by an aerial bombing, crushed to death or beheaded. They only care for the death of their baby and the reasons that caused it, as such.

And now troll off - with your sickening, idiotic and naive one-sided view.
 
Ghouw7uWIAAUFKx
 
A retaliatory incursion?

Is that modern Liberish for rape, beheadings, and cold blooded murder of infants?
Those Jew squatters living on stolen Arab land in Arab villages that were cleansed in 1948 are illegal occupiers. Illegal occupation of houses is regarded as a form of terrorism against the civilian population.

An occupied people have a right under international law to violently resist foreign occupation, this is what the French did in 1942 and the Dutch and the Polish, they resisted foreign occupation and we cheer them for it today.

So any civilian that willfully occupies someone else home as part of a foreign occupation is participating in terrorism and they will be treated accordingly.

Many of the stormed Kibbutz were in fact renamed, ethnically cleansed Arab villages who's inhabitants had been forced to go to Gaza and their homes destroyed to discourage them from returning, well their grandchildren came back on Oct 7th 2023.

The maniacal Zionist regime put Jews in great danger in Israel, those victims probably had been lied to about the Kibbutz, told it was Jewish land for Jews and so on. Well that's a lie and the lies got over a thousands people killed on Oct 7th.

If you'd like supporting documentation you need only ask.

Finally there were no beheadings on Oct 7th and the IDF killed many Jews that day too, so please try to stick with facts and not emotion.
 
Last edited:
Let's get up to date.

Prosecutions for murdering a fetus, also known as fetal homicide, can occur when someone is charged with causing the death of an unborn child. The punishment for this crime is usually the same as if the injury or death happened to the mother.

Federal law
  • The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 protects unborn infants from violence and murder.

  • The federal criminal statutes incorporate the common law “born alive” rule. However, advances in science and medicine have made this rule obsolete.

State laws
  • Some states have laws that authorize homicide charges for causing a pregnancy loss.

  • For example, New Hampshire passed a bill in 2017 that defines a fetus as a person for purposes of criminal prosecution of murder.
Nevertheless, the law in far too many states allow a woman to kill or have her unborn child killed just because she doesn't want to be pregnant. That is a fairly recent development in American culture. Both my children were unplanned and both were at very inconvenient times for us. I did not want to be pregnant at those times. But it never occured toi me that my developing son or daughter was not my child in my womb and to consider killing it was unthinkable.

My story was the same for many millions of women of my generation. Killing the unborn for convenience was not an ethical choice or in pretty much every state a legal choice at that time.

And what are laws if not our ethical choice of what should and should not be legal for governance of the people?
 
Last edited:
15th post
Certainly not - simply because of a 15 month lasting murderous battle with Israel - and Biden having supplied $$ and weapons to Israel in the Billions. Whilst MAGA's where yapping and whining about Biden spending billions onto Israel and other countries.

Hamas didn't start anything aside from enacting a retaliatory incursion into Israel on Oct. 7th 2023 - in response as for what those Zionist genocidal-criminals had been doing endlessly to Palestinians since latest 1948.
for further insight into that which 'hamasites' call "retaliatory" ---read the koran and review the history of the "GLORIOUS" age of Islamic conquest and its resulting shariah shit hole
CALIPHATES created on the dead bodies of
MILLIONS of SCIMITARED infants
 
It might be over voting. But think it over. When can a citizen vote? At 18 years of age. So those supporting abortion should expect us to claim they murder humans who can't vote either.
There is a weird inconsistency that all states give 18 year old the right to vote, most allow 18 years olds to get an abortion, get a tattoo, transgender, legally buy a gun etc. But most states say you have to be 21 to buy cigarettes or hard liquor. How do they justify a person being mature enough to make good decisions about voting etc. but not about other aspects of their lives?

And those protesting might be protesting about any of those things but most will really just be protesting because they like to do that and Trump's election is as good an excuse as any.
 
We have citizens right now that clamor for the wife to kill her child even at age 5. But why stop there?
I had a boss one time who was so much an anarchist he though parents should be able to legally kill their kids.

I can't begin to understand that kind of mentality.

But then I can't understand the mentality of those who assault/kill, vandalize, terrorize, commit arson, burglary, theft, etc. for no other reason than they enjoy doing it either.
 
There's a reason that Trump "hates wars" and IMHO it's pretty easy to see what that is - ha has no control, he cannot bully, he has no authority and he's weak and afraid in such situations.

His bully tactics will not work with Israel or with Russia, he can piss in the wind if he actually thinks he can push Putin around, just as he was weak when trying to push Netanyahu around about settlement building.

So it's going to be somewhat fun to watch the fat bloater try to play statesman with foreign governments, he really wants them all to just go away like he meekly wanted Covid to "just go away", fortunately Trump went away in 2020 and I bet he was actually relieved he lost, because he clearly didn't have a ******* clue what to do about the pandemic.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom