The Official USMB Inauguration Thread - President Donald Trump #47

[Sherlock Holmes]

Israel is not going anywhere. For some reason people believe it is going to disappear. If you think that it must be removed, you need to think of other ways to do so. Of course, more advanced weapons are being procured to use against Israel. I just do not see them going quietly into the night if the worse occurs.

I agree. The state of Israel is a monster, it is unlike any regime on earth today in that it is deeply racist and that racism is supported by the majority of its citizens.

The West have created this monster, a demon incarnate and it has far too much power over other nations. Germany is emasculated by Israel and the United States led along by a nose ring. Other states quiver and shake lest their leaders get called the dreaded "antisemite" because once that happens such leaders are doomed and Trump is no exception.

That kind of power is deeply worrying - or should be - and for that reason continued violence is unavoidable.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

See Road Runner these monstrous people are just as bad as the Nazis. These men (Ben-Gvir is one voice among a great many) openly advocate collective punishment of civilians, that is a war crime, the very same charge that many Nazi commanders faced once and were executed for, the laws being levelled at Israel are the same laws almost word for word as those leveled against the Nazis.

Your an advocate for law and order it seems, so you understand...

 

[Robert W]

Funny, I only remember the fat orange rapist and his family being caught doing that. There was another instance of it just this past week, in fact.

No you don't. Also there is no fort fun in Indiana.

 

[ChristisKing]

I have no idea what "the video" refers to.

The leaders and members of the al-Qassam Brigades, are fully aware that they are dead meat.

Yeah because of Trump.

View attachment 1067545

See Road Runner these monstrous people are just as bad as the Nazis. These men (Ben-Gvir is one voice among a great many) openly advocate collective punishment of civilians, that is a war crime, the very same charge that many Nazi commanders faced once and were executed for, the laws being levelled at Israel are the same laws almost word for word as those leveled against the Nazis.

Your an advocate for law and order it seems, so you understand...

It's self-defense!! Hamas started it!

 

[ChristisKing]

Yes, that the protesters on Monday will be civil and non-violent.

I sure hope and pray that you're right.

 

[Kruska]

Israel is not going anywhere.

Off course not - they got a country to defend and to live in.

However their Zionist policy would go nowhere - without "unconditional" US support.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Yeah because of Trump.




It's self-defense!! Hamas started it!

The British started it in 1917. But I won't go over the history here, I mean I can but you won't listen, you simply don't want to abandon the narrative a narrative embraced equally by democrats and republicans.

Understand that Trump cannot act as he wants to with Israel, if he were to actually push or threaten the regime they WILL band together and they will unleash things that Trump is powerless to stop, all they have to do is start to use the "antisemitic" word, which the lobby uses any and every time it encounters obstacles to Israel's nationalist goals.

Some republicans already did that and labelled Biden as antisemitic when he placed a few minor conditions on settlers last year.

Think on this, if there was a rift between Trump and Israel, who would congress said with? The democrats would side with Israel and the republicans would not want that so they too would side with Israel.

Despite all the bluster and chest thumping from Trump it is all just theatrics, he will do their bidding mark my word.

 

[Sherlock Holmes]

Trump tried to get Netanyahu to publicly acquiesce here, but Netanyahu was silent and had nothing to say to Trump's weak bleating about "hold back on settlements a little bit". Did Netanyahu look intimidated? Nope. Trump simply made it clear he was the weaker partner.

 

[Ringo]

Is it true that Trump is driving around America in SUVs with anti-munitions equipment, the inauguration area in the U.S. capital is being combed for terrorists and radiation, Trump's swearing-in ceremony was moved at the last minute to a room where only the U.S. Congress will be allowed?

 

[Robert W]

There was no attempt to overthrow the government, just to delay certification of the election because many people had concerns about how it was conducted. Oddly enough, every state where I had concerns about extra-legal modifications of the voting laws by courts or governors instead of legislatures voted for Trump this time around after the extra-legal provisions were removed. Covid or no Covid, according to the Constitution, only the state legislatures can mandate or change voting practices in any state.

Tomorrow Democrats will be in DC trying to overthrow the Government that we selected. But we won't jail them as they jailed the Jan 6 protestors. And we must correct them as you did. They think they can get away lying.

Here is part of the Jan 6 day they do not ever talk about as this is the actual story of Trump in the car.

but no one asserted Trump attacked Engel. A separate Secret Service official told CNN that Engel denied that Trump grabbed at the steering wheel or lunged toward an agent on his detail, and that Ornato denied telling Hutchinson such.[16] Politico reported the same day that Engel told the committee during an early 2022 deposition that he had kept his full account of the incident from his Secret Service colleagues for at least fourteen months.[17]

Anthony Ornato - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yep. He always has. The vast majority of Americans want some regulation of abortion and that has been Trump's position for quite some time now. Most Americans and Trump oppose the most draconian restrictions on abortion but accept the decision of the very few states imposing those knowing that sooner or later they'll get it right. Abortion on demand for any reason whatsoever at any stage of pregnancy is just as draconian.

Those people protesting don't give a damn about anybody's 'reproductive rights' though and the people's choice be damned. They are protesting because the person/party they hate is in power.

You don't see those on the right doing that. Ever.

Yes, most people would agree that there should be some restrictions after viability . We do not advocate abortion on demand for any reason whatsoever at any stage of pregnancy That is a lie that has been told to you by Trump and his goons and you people are gullible enough to believe it He also said that babies are being killed after they are born,,,AND MANY OF YOU PEOPLE BELIEVED IT,

Most people also agree that there needs to be exception to that rule and that the decision to have an abortion should be between a woman , he family and medical professionals. For instance, you can find false comfort in saying that there is an exception for situations where the woman’s life is in danger, but that is a fuzzy line and doctors are fearful that some prosecutor will second guess them and decide that she was not close enough to death, and therefore it was an illegal procedure. Women have died because of that. In other cases women were forced to carry to term a not viable fetus resulting in long term health issues, Such exceptions written into law must make it clear that the decision has to be based on the judgement of the doctor and not a prosecutor or the bureaucrats .

And what about contraception and meaningful sex education? What about day care social safety net programs that just might encourage an d incentivise people to carry a child to term rather than abort- knowing that help will be there ? Does your boy support any of that? Not the last I heard. So don’t give me any of that shit about us not caring about reproductive rights . You’re the ones who ulterior motives- controlling women, needing more white babies and kissing up to the religious right. Not only do you not care about the fetus, you don’t give a shit about the children after they’re born either;

You all seem to think that we liberals have some warm and fuzzy cavalier relationship to abortion and take is lightly. We do not. It is unpleasant and should be avoided when possible But it should be available and because of Trump and the Republicans, there are large swaths of the country where it is no available. No only are women suffering medically, but they are also being forced to carry rapist’s babies , No , you people do not have the moral high ground here

 

[Robert W]

Yes, that the protesters on Monday will be civil and non-violent.

You are exposed.

January 6 protestors of 2020 were civil and non violent. I wish the cops had been non violent since some beat protestors and one killed a protestor.

 

[d0gbreath]

He's the first Sheriff I've known of that isn't allowed to own a gun.

 

[Foxfyre]

Yest, most people would agree that there should be some restrictions after viability . We do not advocate abortion on demand for any reason whatsoever at any stage of pregnancy That is a lie that has been told to you by Trump and his goons and you people are gullible enough to believe it He also said that babies are being killed after they are born,,,AND MANY OF YOU PEOPLE BELIEVED IT,

Most people also agree that there needs to be exception to that rule and that the decision to have an abortion should be between a woman , he family and medical professionals. For instance, you can find false comfort in saying that there is an exception for situations where the woman’s life is in danger, but that is a fuzzy line and doctors are fearful that some prosecutor will second guess them and decide that she was not close enough to death, and therefore it was an illegal procedure. Women have died because of that. In other cases women were forced to carry to term a not viable fetus resulting in long term health issues, Such exceptions written into law must make it clear that it clear that the decision has to be based on the judgement of the doctor and not a prosecutor or the bureaucrats .

And what about contraception and meaningful sex education? What about day care social safety net programs that just might encourage an d incentivize people to carry a child to term rather than abort- knowing that help will be there ? Does your boy support any of that? Not the last I heard. So don’t give me any of that shit about us not caring about reproductive rights . You’re the ones who ulterior motives- controlling women, needing more white babies and kissing up to the religious right. Not only do you not care about the fetus, you don’t give a shit about the children after they’re born either;

You all seem to think that we liberals have some warm and fuzzy cavalier relationship to abortion and take is lightly. We do not. It is unpleasant and should be avoided when possible But it should be available and because of Trump and the Republicans, there are large swaths of the country where it is no available. No only are women suffering medically, but they are also being forced to carry rapist’s babies , No , you people do not have the moral high ground here

When you advocate for no restrictions on abortion--when you object to any restrictions on abortion--you are advocating for abortion on demand at any stage whether that is your intention or not. At least nine states have no regulation at all.

 

[Kruska]

[Yeah because of Trump.

Certainly not - simply because of a 15 month lasting murderous battle with Israel - and Biden having supplied $$ and weapons to Israel in the Billions. Whilst MAGA's where yapping and whining about Biden spending billions onto Israel and other countries.

It's self-defense!! Hamas started it!

Hamas didn't start anything aside from enacting a retaliatory incursion into Israel on Oct. 7th 2023 - in response as for what those Zionist genocidal-criminals had been doing endlessly to Palestinians since latest 1948.

 

[Robert W]

Most people also agree that there needs to be exception to that rule and that the decision to have an abortion should be between a woman , he family and medical professionals. For instance, you can find false comfort in saying that there is an exception for situations where the woman’s life is in danger, but that is a fuzzy line and doctors are fearful that some prosecutor will second guess them and decide that she was not close enough to death, and therefore it was an illegal procedure.

When do you expect the decision by only the wife of her husband will also have the right to kill her child when the child at age 7 is found to have changed so much the child is terminally ill or has gone nuts? Should she be forced to pay expensive medical bills just to support the insane child?

 

[Robert W]

When you advocate for no restrictions on abortion--when you object to any restrictions on abortion--you are advocating for abortion on demand at any stage whether that is your intention or not. At least nine states have no regulation at all.

You know Foxfyre, in the United States one would expect citizens to value others who are still citizens when in the womb. The party in the womb is on the path to being an adult citizen over time.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

When you advocate for no restrictions on abortion--when you object to any restrictions on abortion--you are advocating for abortion on demand at any stage whether that is your intention or not. At least nine states have no regulation at all.

Do you have a problem with reading comprehension, Bubba??

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

No, the truth is you're just easily impressed.

The genocidal Zionist regime are going to pound Gaza again soon, just watch - and Trump is powerless to stop that.

It's PR and Trump's going to return Nazinyahu's favor soon, there's no such thing as a free lunch.

Yep. Israel will pound Gaza again when Hamas breaks the agreement like they always do. You’ll ignore that and scream ZIONIST! like you always do.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

When do you expect the decision by only the wife of her husband will also have the right to kill her child when the child at age 7 is found to have changed so much the child is terminally ill or has gone nuts? Should she be forced to pay expensive medical bills just to support the insane child?

WHAT???!