The new Superman....................what do you think?

Yeah.....but this movie felt they had to make it a major point of the plot, it seems.

I can't wait to see it.
well when you see it you will see why....i read a comic back when that kind of dealt on the same thing...but only it was on a world basis not just the US...the UN said he was an honorary citizen of the earth since he helps everyone....
 
...

In the pregnant Lois scenario, the fetus still was exposed to yellow sun rays via the umbilical connection with his mother who, of course, was exposed to the sun everyday.
Sunlight is not transmitted via the umbilical cord.
 
Sunlight is not transmitted via the umbilical cord.
Well, the fetus got powers somehow. Maybe all it needed was mom’s vitamin D or something. The comics were always vague about how exactly sunlight gives Superman powers
 

I agree

George Reeves may have not been the best Superman but he made the best Clark Kent.

Many versions interpret “mild mannered reporter” to mean gay. Christopher Reeve’s Clark Kent is an example.

George Reeves Clark Kent was a damned good reporter and could carry many of the plots
 
The Studio is disappointed with its box office and audience reception .
Source? The movie is being credited with resurrecting the DC movie franchise and Warner Bros has already declared it a success.

Is this gonna be one of those situations where a poster here just doubles down on an obviously factually untrue statement?

You people do that a lot on USMB

It’s weird how much you people do that here
 
George Reeves Clark Kent was a damned good reporter and could carry many of the plots
I’ve read that the reason that show relied so heavily on the Clark/Lois as reporters angle was to save money on special effects.

But the show was probably better for it
 
Foxsnews Radio , The Liberty Daily , Breitbart , KRCR News Channel 7 Redding …
So the studio, the production company, all movie industry websites as well as every major news outlet are ALL lying and your little gaggle of far right blogs are bravely telling the truth that the movie’s a flop?

Why can’t you just admit you were wrong?
 
One could write a pretty good sized pamphlet describing all of the just-too-preposterous aspects of the Superman character. Reading (or watching) science fiction requires that the reader set aside his disbelief in one key area (e.g., time or space travel), but beyond that the characters should act as rational beings according to the stimuli of the story.

Starting with the fact that adding a pair of glasses makes Superman unrecognizable as Clark Kent...

I can no longer watch it, regardless of who plays the title role.
 
Plus, those sites complaining about the movie being “woke” is not the same thing as them claiming the move is a box office or critical flop.

You do realize that, don’t you?

Either the movie is a financial success or it isn’t. It’s one or the other.

It’s earned 217 million so far. Therefore it is a success. Whether you like the movie or not is irrelevant to that fact.

It’s something that is factual. Not an opinion or something that can be argued.

Do you understand the difference?
 
So the studio, the production company, all movie industry websites as well as every major news outlet are ALL lying and your little gaggle of far right blogs are bravely telling the truth that the movie’s a flop?

Why can’t you just admit you were wrong?
Again, $217MM over the weekend. Its a major hit.

I don't understand why MAGA have their panties in a wad on this one.
 
15th post
i didnt see any lectures and his parents did not want him to do terrible things to the earth.....
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom