The metaphorical wrecking ball analogy takes a physical form.

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It is our business, it is the people’s building. I want the same accountability with Democrats and Republicans.

None of your business as long as it is privately done. Your name is not on the list of current occupants. This is DEMs looking for something to scream OMB!

 

[OldFlame]

It is our business, it is the people’s building. I want the same accountability with Democrats and Republicans.

What accountability are you missing?

 

[Lockback]

All of the donors are acknowledged

Oh. Like the Chinese Communist Party and Friends of Fidel?

 

[rightwinger]

Oh. Like the Chinese Communist Party and Friends of Fidel?

Link

 

[Lockback]

You're right. Currently it takes $100,000 or more to buy group access to Trump.
And over $2,000,000 to buy personal access to Trump.

No word yet on how much a pardon goes for.

But FCC approvals go for $16,000,000

Only in the mind of a TDS Cult Member who refuses to admit reality.

 

[Lockback]

Link

Ladies and gentlemen, once again the complete lack of a sense of humor by leftists is on full display here.

 

[rightwinger]

Harry Truman completely gutted the place you moron....upgrades need to happen ... Did you practice being this stupid or yl were just born this way?

Truman saved a White House that was crumbling.

Trump tore down the Rose Garden, added tacky gold trim and a ballroom for his friends

 

[rightwinger]

None of your business as long as it is privately done. Your name is not on the list of current occupants. This is DEMs looking for something to scream OMB!

Yes it is our business
It is our building.

We need to know who contributed and what the terms were
Just like that “free airplane “

 

[rightwinger]

Were there donors for Barry’s basettball court?

Pennies

 

[Jroc]

Truman saved a White House that was crumbling.

Trump tore down the Rose Garden, added tacky gold trim and a ballroom for his friends

Did you cry when Michelle Obama's Rose garden was dismantled

 

[Papageorgio]

None of your business as long as it is privately done. Your name is not on the list of current occupants. This is DEMs looking for something to scream OMB!

It is a public building and it is not others to do with what they like. I have no issue with what is being done, but the the government has an obligation to be transparent, with our public buildings.

 

[Jroc]

It is a public building and it is not others to do with what they like. I have no issue with what is being done, but the the government has an obligation to be transparent, with our public buildings.

What's being hidden?

 

[Papageorgio]

What accountability are you missing?

It is the people’s building, we allow the presidents to stay there. The funding and the amount needs to be of public record.

 

[rightwinger]

Did you cry when Michelle Obama's Rose garden was dismantled

Michelle had a vegetable garden that children helped cultivate

 

[OldFlame]

It is our business, it is the people’s building. I want the same accountability with Democrats and Republicans.

Who is paying for Donald Trump's new White House ballroom?

A former White House chief ethics lawyer described the ballroom donations as an ethical "nightmare".

www.bbc.com

As construction begins on US President Donald Trump's new $250m (£187m) White House ballroom, mystery continues to swirl around the identities of the wealthy donors and corporations paying for it.

Groundbreaking for the ornate 90,000 sq ft (8,360 sq m) project began on Monday, with excavators and construction workers tearing out portions of the East Wing.

The US president has said that he personally will pay for significant portions of its construction, and suggested that some still anonymous donors would be willing to spend more than $20m to complete the project.

The funding model has sparked concern among some legal experts, who say it may amount to paying for access to the administration.

"I view this enormous ballroom as an ethics nightmare," Richard Painter, a former chief ethics lawyer in the Bush White House between 2005 and 2007, told the BBC.

"It's using access to the White House to raise money. I don't like it," he added. "These corporations all want something from the government."

A dinner for potential donors held at the White House on 15 October included senior executives from prominent US companies including Blackstone, OpenAI, Microsoft, Coinbase, Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Microsoft, Amazon and Google.

Also present was Woody Johnson, the owner of the New York Jets NFL team, and Shari and Edward Glazer, who, together with their siblings, own both the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and Manchester United.

A pledge form seen by CBS News, the BBC's US partner, suggested that donors could be eligible for "recognition" for their contributions. While plans are still being finalised, that recognition could potentially take the form of names etched into the structure.

The White House had originally said that the gigantic structure would have a seated capacity of 650 people. This week, Trump said that it will be able to hold 999.

Only one contributor has so far been revealed.

Court documents show that YouTube will pay $22m towards the project as part of a settlement with Trump regarding a lawsuit over the suspension of his account following the 6 January 2021 riot at the US Capitol.

But it is unclear how many of the rest of those in attendance may have pledged to donate, or how much. An official list has yet to be published, though White House officials say they plan to reveal the one.

Documents obtained by CBS indicate the donations will be handled by the Trust for the National Mall, a non-profit that works with the National Park Service and fundraises for projects on the Mall and at the White House.

At the event for potential donors, Trump said many of the attendees had been "really, really generous" and said that some had asked whether $25m was an appropriate donation.

"I said: I will take it," Trump remarked.

The White House has insisted there was nothing inappropriate about soliciting donations and that the ballroom will be used by future administrations. The renovation will not cost US taxpayers a cent, it has said.

Martin Mongiello, a former White House executive chef and Camp David general manager who has worked under seven administrations, told the BBC that the money paid to the ballroom "will eventually pay for itself and save costs".

The tents sometimes set outside for events - which he described as "elbow to elbow" and "embarrassing", often cost $1m or more, not including other ancillary costs associated with having large-scale events.

But Mr Painter suggested it could be considered a "pay-to-play scheme", which has dogged previous White House administrations of both political parties.

In the 1990s, for example, then-President Bill Clinton came under scrutiny for allegedly selling overnight stays in the Lincoln Bedroom in exchange for campaign contributions.

More recently, Trump sought corporate sponsors for the annual White House Easter Egg Roll in April, which some said could amount to companies vying for the president's attention.

Trump and administration officials have said that the new ballroom was a necessary renovation given the lack of large existing facilities to hold state dinners and other events. The White House often uses a tent on the South Lawn to fete foreign leaders and a larger guest list for a state dinner.

But the scale of the new ballroom, Mr Painter added, poses an "enormous temptation" to use the facility for political fundraising that was not the case before, even if presidents from both parties have invited supporters to events.

"The limited space [now] means that not everyone gets a White House invitation," he said. "In my view, that's a good thing... The [current] size limits the 'pay to play' game, at least on White House premises."

Proving any wrongdoing, however, is unlikely.

"You can't prove a quid pro quo," Mr Painter said. "But I think the Trump administration is pushing the envelope here."



They can 'think' whatever they want, and I doubt that the 'scrutiny' that Clinton took was even in the media at the time, not like everything to do with what Trump does is. This is nothing more than another TDS temper tantrum.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Needs an underground gun range.

 

[OldFlame]

It is the people’s building, we allow the presidents to stay there. The funding and the amount needs to be of public record.

And it will be eventually, it's not like they're writing checks to Trump personally and he is the only one that knows, and he is paying for a significant portion of it out of his own pocket. He's also using funds he won in his lawsuit with YouTube to put towards it, not taking any salary, and all you people want to do is ***** and complain.

 

[OldFlame]

Yes it is our business
It is our building.

We need to know who contributed and what the terms were
Just like that “free airplane “

No, you really don't 'need to know', but you will know eventually.

 

[Papageorgio]

What's being hidden?

Who donated what and how much.

 

[Leo123]

Looks just like a conference center hotel.

No one cares what you think.