The Media And The Iranian Nuclear Program

Funny how you guys would believe terrorists who chant "death to America" when just about every country in the world, including Russia and China, were worried about Iran possessing nuclear weapons.
I suppose this is what falls out of your face, when you get something simple correctly explained to you, and it doesn't affirm your prescribed fetishes.

Of course everyone is worried. That's why they are watched so closely.
 
CORRECTION: Iran had no nuclear program until Trump told them they didnt have to follow any rules because rules are for suckers. Afterwards they went from near zero to about 30% of the way there. Trump bombed them back to 27% of the way there.

OP is not right in the head.
It is time to put these treasonous traitors who spew lies 24 hours a day into prison. These shills get people killed.
 
If Iran just wants to use their nuclear program for domestic applications like energy and medicine, why is it buried over 300 feet deep in a mountain?
Domestic applications only require 5-6% enrichment. Iran was at 60% enrichment and was full steam ahead to the 90% required to make nuclear weapons.
 
I find it interesting that before the attacks and even shortly afterwards the media were all saying Iran didn't have a nuclear program. Now, after assessments are coming in, all of a sudden the media are reporting that the attacks only set their nuclear program back a few months.

It's why I don't trust the MSM
 
Domestic applications only require 5-6% enrichment. Iran was at 60% enrichment and was full steam ahead to the 90% required to make nuclear weapons.
There is no evidence whatsoever they were enriching to 90%. The 60% is leverage.

You can agree or disagree with bombing them on this basis alone, up to you. But to say that means they are weeks from a nuclear bomb is absurd.
 
Nobody ever denied Iran had a nuclear program to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

What was claimed lately by the entire intelligence apparatus -- and reported by the media -- was that Iran was not only not "a couple weeks" from having a nuclear bomb, but was not even working on a nuclear bomb.

So, when it is said that the nuclear program was "set back by months", nobody is referring to bomb making. Just the nuclear program in general.
60% enriched uranium has no peaceful purpose, dumbass.
 
There is no evidence whatsoever they were enriching to 90%. The 60% is leverage.

You can agree or disagree with bombing them on this basis alone, up to you. But to say that means they are weeks from a nuclear bomb is absurd.
Going from 60% to 90% is easy.
 
15th post
60% enriched uranium has no peaceful purpose, dumbass.
Nobody said otherwise. It also isn't weeks from a nuclear bomb.

We known they enriched to 60%, because they announced it to the world. They are using that as leverage to forge an agreement to lift sanctions on their economy. They had one. Now Trump wants another one. They are game, they want their economy to flow. I bet Trump is game, too.
 
Nobody said otherwise. It also isn't weeks from a nuclear bomb.

We known they enriched to 60%, because they announced it to the world. They are using that as leverage to forge an agreement to lift sanctions on their economy. They had one. Now Trump wants another one. They are game, they want their economy to flow. I bet Trump is game, too.

When did Iran announce to the world they achieved 60?

Roflmao
 
Nobody said otherwise. It also isn't weeks from a nuclear bomb.

We known they enriched to 60%, because they announced it to the world. They are using that as leverage to forge an agreement to lift sanctions on their economy. They had one. Now Trump wants another one. They are game, they want their economy to flow. I bet Trump is game, too.
How stupid.

Why not just NOT enrich to 60% and there would be no sanctions.

You are a complete moron. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom