The Manson family was really a story about Jesus

[shimon]

Nothing like someone coming on the board and starting a thread to announce their profound stupidity.

lol..,,,especially after announcing that they are the real Jewish Messiah....

I get a kick out of shimon groveling at his feet as if he believes that the Jewish people have been waiting for millennia for this schmuck to show up....

Sounds a lot more like Christians waiting for their Jesus to show up again then it does Jews who would have thought.. Right back at cha...Calling someone a Shmuck or a dork or a groveller seems to be your way of dealing with people you are no different then your relative who pissed on the wall of that church when you disagree with what they say or do.. Now aren't you being the childish one having a temper tantrum...

 

[shimon]

The swastica is the crooked Cross... Hitler saw it when he went to catholic school..He remembered his lessons well..The thousand year Reich .. The thousand year reign of Christ etc etc..You do not understand Blackrook... Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it... The hatred of the Jews is found and taught in the New Testament Hashev is only pointing it out...You think he is full of hate you are incorrect...If he was full of hate he would leave you and others to wallow in your mistaken beliefs..People that want to better others teach them a better way to live life you have it backwards....

You left out that the crooked cross was a sun cross tying the whole Baal sun cross used for Jesus cross as all being one in the same
Aryan Mystery Babylon sun harvest god worship. How many Evangelists have to call asking for money as sowing seeds before they grasp it's the same scam and the same Adversary (satanic) theology?

Yes I suppose I did I remember reading that the church Hitler attended as a child had the many forms of crosses on the wall if my memory is correct that symbol of the swastica came from India but the Sun symbol Cross is very similar to a compass where the Sun is always depicted as Rising from the East ( hence Easter) of course you have pointed out the Baal connection many many times and your point is well taken... Course by my agreeing with you Hobe may accuse me of grovelling again or someone else can play the let's beat up on the Jew game some more because they don't agree or grasp our viewpoints

 

[Penelope]

The swastica is the crooked Cross... Hitler saw it when he went to catholic school..He remembered his lessons well..The thousand year Reich .. The thousand year reign of Christ etc etc..You do not understand Blackrook... Those who forget the past are doomed to repeat it... The hatred of the Jews is found and taught in the New Testament Hashev is only pointing it out...You think he is full of hate you are incorrect...If he was full of hate he would leave you and others to wallow in your mistaken beliefs..People that want to better others teach them a better way to live life you have it backwards....

You left out that the crooked cross was a sun cross tying the whole Baal sun cross used for Jesus cross as all being one in the same
Aryan Mystery Babylon sun harvest god worship. How many Evangelists have to call asking for money as sowing seeds before they grasp it's the same scam and the same Adversary (satanic) theology?

Yes I suppose I did I remember reading that the church Hitler attended as a child had the many forms of crosses on the wall if my memory is correct that symbol of the swastica came from India but the Sun symbol Cross is very similar to a compass where the Sun is always depicted as Rising from the East ( hence Easter) of course you have pointed out the Baal connection many many times and your point is well taken... Course by my agreeing with you Hobe may accuse me of grovelling again or someone else can play the let's beat up on the Jew game some more because they don't agree or grasp our viewpoints

Yes that is why Moses had to wear a veil over his face. Too radiant. Too bad they didn't have sunglasses.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

I get the Crusades and the Inquisition, but you're blaming us for the Holocaust too?

The Nazis were not exactly motivated by Christianity.

Thousands of priests, pastors, brothers and nuns were exterminated in the concentration camps, including two who were canonized as Catholic saints.

Nazis were actually agents for Christendom.
In 1939 the Nazis barred Jews from train dining cars.
The Church’s Synod of Elvira (306) forbade Jews and Christians eating together.

The Synod of Clement (535) parallels the law for the Re-establishment of the Professional Civil Service (Nazi Germany -1933) by disallowing Jews from holding public office.

The Third Synod of Orleans (538) inhibited Jews from showing themselves in the streets during passion Week. In 1938 the Nazis past a decree allowing authorities to ban Jews from the streets on certain days such as Nazi Holidays.

During the Synod of Toledo the Talmud and other books were burned. Similar book burnings were a regular event in Nazi Germany.

The law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor (1935)
parallels the Synod of Elvira (306), which prohibited intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Christians and Jews.


The fourth Lateran Council (1215) mandated the marking of
Jewish clothes with a badge. In 1941 the Nazis forced Jews
to wear a Star of David. So Christendom foreshadowed the
Nazis.

In 1222 the Council of Oxford banned the construction of new
synagogues. In 1938 the Nazis destroyed synagogues in the
entire Third Reich. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

In 1279 the Synod of Breslau legislated for compulsory ghettoes.
In 1939 Heydrich also ordered compulsory ghettoes for Jews.
Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

The Synod of Ofen (1279) forbade Christians from selling or
renting real estate to Jews. In 1939 a Nazi decree mandated
the sale of Jewish real estate. Again Christendom foreshadowed
the Nazis.

The Council of Basel (1434) prevented Jews from obtaining
academic degrees. In 1933 the Nazis passed a law against,
"Overcrowding of German Schools and Universities" with
the same effect. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.
The Synod of Gerona (1078) forced Jews to make contributions
to the Church equal to that of Christians. The 1940
Sozialausgleichsabgabe enforced a special Jewish income tax
equal to the party contribution levied on Nazis. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

"The Nazis 'did not discard the past; they built upon it. They didn’t begin a development; they completed it.' This fact makes
ludicrous any unqualified claim that the Nazis were the enemies
of Christendom. In actuality, they were in very large measure the
agents for the 'practical' application of an established social logic."
(Hilberg, R., "The Destruction of the European Jews" Chicago:
Quadrangle, 1961), and (Eckardt, "Elder and Younger Brothers:
The Encounter of Jews and Christians" New York: Schocken
1973, 12-14).

The roots of the antisemitic "established social logic" referred to above lie in the antisemitic potential of the NT. The roots of modern antisemitism lie in the pages of the NT. Without it the Shoah (Holocaust) would never have happened.
A Disturbing Fact:
On April 19 1939 in celebration of Hitler's birthday All Catholic churches in greater Germany hoisted the Swastica in Celebration.

There was no grand scheme to get rid of the Jews, but the rich religious jews in Poland started a trade war with Germany, the German Jews liked Germany.

I assume you are referring to the Jewish led boycott of Germany which had nothing to do with Poland or its Jews and was organized in the US and came only after the Nazi regime sponsored boycotts and vandalism of German Jewish businesses. Your assertion that there was no plan to get rid of the Jews can only have been written by someone who hasn't read Mein Kampf, kill yourself you Nazi kunt.

 

[Penelope]

I get the Crusades and the Inquisition, but you're blaming us for the Holocaust too?

The Nazis were not exactly motivated by Christianity.

Thousands of priests, pastors, brothers and nuns were exterminated in the concentration camps, including two who were canonized as Catholic saints.

Nazis were actually agents for Christendom.
In 1939 the Nazis barred Jews from train dining cars.
The Church’s Synod of Elvira (306) forbade Jews and Christians eating together.

The Synod of Clement (535) parallels the law for the Re-establishment of the Professional Civil Service (Nazi Germany -1933) by disallowing Jews from holding public office.

The Third Synod of Orleans (538) inhibited Jews from showing themselves in the streets during passion Week. In 1938 the Nazis past a decree allowing authorities to ban Jews from the streets on certain days such as Nazi Holidays.

During the Synod of Toledo the Talmud and other books were burned. Similar book burnings were a regular event in Nazi Germany.

The law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor (1935)
parallels the Synod of Elvira (306), which prohibited intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Christians and Jews.


The fourth Lateran Council (1215) mandated the marking of
Jewish clothes with a badge. In 1941 the Nazis forced Jews
to wear a Star of David. So Christendom foreshadowed the
Nazis.

In 1222 the Council of Oxford banned the construction of new
synagogues. In 1938 the Nazis destroyed synagogues in the
entire Third Reich. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

In 1279 the Synod of Breslau legislated for compulsory ghettoes.
In 1939 Heydrich also ordered compulsory ghettoes for Jews.
Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

The Synod of Ofen (1279) forbade Christians from selling or
renting real estate to Jews. In 1939 a Nazi decree mandated
the sale of Jewish real estate. Again Christendom foreshadowed
the Nazis.

The Council of Basel (1434) prevented Jews from obtaining
academic degrees. In 1933 the Nazis passed a law against,
"Overcrowding of German Schools and Universities" with
the same effect. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.
The Synod of Gerona (1078) forced Jews to make contributions
to the Church equal to that of Christians. The 1940
Sozialausgleichsabgabe enforced a special Jewish income tax
equal to the party contribution levied on Nazis. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

"The Nazis 'did not discard the past; they built upon it. They didn’t begin a development; they completed it.' This fact makes
ludicrous any unqualified claim that the Nazis were the enemies
of Christendom. In actuality, they were in very large measure the
agents for the 'practical' application of an established social logic."
(Hilberg, R., "The Destruction of the European Jews" Chicago:
Quadrangle, 1961), and (Eckardt, "Elder and Younger Brothers:
The Encounter of Jews and Christians" New York: Schocken
1973, 12-14).

The roots of the antisemitic "established social logic" referred to above lie in the antisemitic potential of the NT. The roots of modern antisemitism lie in the pages of the NT. Without it the Shoah (Holocaust) would never have happened.
A Disturbing Fact:
On April 19 1939 in celebration of Hitler's birthday All Catholic churches in greater Germany hoisted the Swastica in Celebration.

There was no grand scheme to get rid of the Jews, but the rich religious jews in Poland started a trade war with Germany, the German Jews liked Germany.

I assume you are referring to the Jewish led boycott of Germany which had nothing to do with Poland or its Jews and was organized in the US and came only after the Nazi regime sponsored boycotts and vandalism of German Jewish businesses. Your assertion that there was no plan to get rid of the Jews can only have been written by someone who hasn't read Mein Kampf, kill yourself you Nazi kunt.

Judea declares war on Germany in 1933, of course there was no Judea so it meant collective jews of the world unite. The religious Jews in Warsaw boycotted Germany, even the German jews did not like it , nor the ones in Palestine who lived off their orange exports to Germany.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

I get the Crusades and the Inquisition, but you're blaming us for the Holocaust too?

The Nazis were not exactly motivated by Christianity.

Thousands of priests, pastors, brothers and nuns were exterminated in the concentration camps, including two who were canonized as Catholic saints.

Nazis were actually agents for Christendom.
In 1939 the Nazis barred Jews from train dining cars.
The Church’s Synod of Elvira (306) forbade Jews and Christians eating together.

The Synod of Clement (535) parallels the law for the Re-establishment of the Professional Civil Service (Nazi Germany -1933) by disallowing Jews from holding public office.

The Third Synod of Orleans (538) inhibited Jews from showing themselves in the streets during passion Week. In 1938 the Nazis past a decree allowing authorities to ban Jews from the streets on certain days such as Nazi Holidays.

During the Synod of Toledo the Talmud and other books were burned. Similar book burnings were a regular event in Nazi Germany.

The law for the Protection of German Blood and Honor (1935)
parallels the Synod of Elvira (306), which prohibited intermarriage and sexual intercourse between Christians and Jews.


The fourth Lateran Council (1215) mandated the marking of
Jewish clothes with a badge. In 1941 the Nazis forced Jews
to wear a Star of David. So Christendom foreshadowed the
Nazis.

In 1222 the Council of Oxford banned the construction of new
synagogues. In 1938 the Nazis destroyed synagogues in the
entire Third Reich. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

In 1279 the Synod of Breslau legislated for compulsory ghettoes.
In 1939 Heydrich also ordered compulsory ghettoes for Jews.
Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

The Synod of Ofen (1279) forbade Christians from selling or
renting real estate to Jews. In 1939 a Nazi decree mandated
the sale of Jewish real estate. Again Christendom foreshadowed
the Nazis.

The Council of Basel (1434) prevented Jews from obtaining
academic degrees. In 1933 the Nazis passed a law against,
"Overcrowding of German Schools and Universities" with
the same effect. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.
The Synod of Gerona (1078) forced Jews to make contributions
to the Church equal to that of Christians. The 1940
Sozialausgleichsabgabe enforced a special Jewish income tax
equal to the party contribution levied on Nazis. Again Christendom foreshadowed the Nazis.

"The Nazis 'did not discard the past; they built upon it. They didn’t begin a development; they completed it.' This fact makes
ludicrous any unqualified claim that the Nazis were the enemies
of Christendom. In actuality, they were in very large measure the
agents for the 'practical' application of an established social logic."
(Hilberg, R., "The Destruction of the European Jews" Chicago:
Quadrangle, 1961), and (Eckardt, "Elder and Younger Brothers:
The Encounter of Jews and Christians" New York: Schocken
1973, 12-14).

The roots of the antisemitic "established social logic" referred to above lie in the antisemitic potential of the NT. The roots of modern antisemitism lie in the pages of the NT. Without it the Shoah (Holocaust) would never have happened.
A Disturbing Fact:
On April 19 1939 in celebration of Hitler's birthday All Catholic churches in greater Germany hoisted the Swastica in Celebration.

There was no grand scheme to get rid of the Jews, but the rich religious jews in Poland started a trade war with Germany, the German Jews liked Germany.

I assume you are referring to the Jewish led boycott of Germany which had nothing to do with Poland or its Jews and was organized in the US and came only after the Nazi regime sponsored boycotts and vandalism of German Jewish businesses. Your assertion that there was no plan to get rid of the Jews can only have been written by someone who hasn't read Mein Kampf, kill yourself you Nazi kunt.

Judea declares war on Germany in 1933, of course there was no Judea so it meant collective jews of the world unite. The religious Jews in Warsaw boycotted Germany, even the German jews did not like it , nor the ones in Palestine who lived off their orange exports to Germany.

It was organized in the US and UK, had nothing to do with Polish Jews, and was a direct response to the Nazi regime sponsored boycotts and vandalism of German Jewish businesses which preceded it you stupid Nazi sympathizing ignorant kunt, no wonder you love the pedophile worshippers, you're a fucking Nazi bitch, you're kindred spirits, but this time it's going to be your ilk headed for the gas chambers.

 

[HaShev]

This must be the unrefuted thread Blackrook is trying to burry with forum post flooding.
So let's discuss.
If using Christian logic of commonality of personas being matched assumes them as fulfilled scripture indications, then this equates to the return of Jesus being Charlie Manson using that same standard.
Charlie Manson does not emulate the Rooster who fulfilled more verses then Jesus, nor did Charlie Manson match or emulate me who fulfills over 1200 verses of scripture.
Charlie Manson claiming to be Jesus only Fulfills all the stories of Jesus and his claim to return to divide and burn the earth (which is what Manson claimed to want to do too.)
Using Christianity standards of reason Manson has to be Jesus or admit their whole faith is as insane as they called this satirical post which used their own standard of logic which they inadvertantly were calling insane.
In other words they admitted their connect the dots is as batty as Rachel Maddows connect the dots, without realizing it.
Lashing out at something intended to reflect through satire, just because you can't refute it or are embarassed by it is very telling as well.

 

[shimon]

Yah...lol...Hmmm Blackrook would never flood the board with silly inane topics would he.. Could he...I wonder if when he plays chess and a pawn takes his rook does he have a hissy fit and throw all the pieces off the board so no one can enjoy the game...I wonder if Christians ever see that behaviour in themselves when a light is shone on their dark rook( Jesus) too...

 

[RWNJ]

Using Blackrooks standard:
Charlie Manson said he was Jesus, well according to Christian reasoning they can't argue against it without arguing against themselves and their own beliefs.
The logic used is merely through silly fallacious claims to Jesus being Messiah based merely on self testimony & saying he fit 300 prophecy, most of which aren't even messianic or properly read and stated. Some are even comically based on NT post dated script instead of OT.

Using this logic if Charles Manson fit 300 characteristics of Jesus without manipulating the characteristics or cheating like people do in emulating Moshiach then Charles Manson has to be Jesus according to Christian standards of reasoning. And since Charles Manson self trstified he was and does fulfill the coming of Jesus in over 300 ways then Jesus came back bringing division & as a murderer as he said he would in Matthew, Thomas, and Peter.
Since Jesus fulfilled over 300 verses on Satan then he must be Satan of the Bible.
Therefore Christianity standards and reasoning suggest Satan was Jesus and he came back as Charles Manson and your arguing this fact would suggest you are admitting Christianity's logic and reasoning on Moshiach is skewed.

Therfore moshiach claims must be forfeited and the standard to decipher MOshiach has to be re-evaluated and rediscovered by fulfillment of legitimate expectations that are Torah based not oral pagan borrowed traditions and self testimony.
Conclusion" Jesus either wasn't messiah like you thought or by your standards he had to be Satan, either way your character becomes the adversary and thief, thus either way he can be concluded as Satan.

FACT: Jesus is depicted like a long haired hippy in sandles.
Charles Manson claimed to be Jesus and was a hippy in sandles, we must take Manson for his word in even standard to Christians taking Jesus self testified word and claims.
Fact: they say Jesus is son of man & Charles is Man/son.
Fact: Jesus family said he was crazy
Manson and his family is crazy.
Jesus was a murderer from the begining who promised to not bring peace but to cause opposite through division describing a world inferno. Manson did the same with his race war he planed division chaos and worlds end in the same manner setting it a blaze.
Fact: Jesus asked his followers to disregard their parents for sake of him being their new family as did Manson.
Jesus lived in a shack so did Manson.
Jesus hated the Romans, Manson hsted Roman Polanski. Jesus took mushrooms as did his followers according to found texts, Manson did as well as his followers.
Cult leaderJesus had his apostles Manson had his cult flock called his family. Jesus lived and roamed the desert, so did Manson.

Using Christian logic & standards
Charlie Manson Was Jesus and Jesus was Lucifer cause all the verses on Lucifer were 100% fulfilled by the first fallen Christ.

To disagree is to admit the standard used to call him Moshiach is flawed making him Lucifer anyway.... this is called Check mate...
because every excuse maneuver you make out of this still means I got your king.
My kNight to your King= Check Mate!
That's why I use that term, so you'd notice your argument backed you in a corner with 0 excuses and maneuvers left.
All you can do is
1)cheat
2)pretend your mom is calling and run away
3) throw the chess board to the ground and have an ad hominem hissy fit like a child.
So far everyone seems to choose option 3.

I've met rocks that were smarter than you.

 

[HaShev]

Using Blackrooks standard:
Charlie Manson said he was Jesus, well according to Christian reasoning they can't argue against it without arguing against themselves and their own beliefs.
The logic used is merely through silly fallacious claims to Jesus being Messiah based merely on self testimony & saying he fit 300 prophecy, most of which aren't even messianic or properly read and stated. Some are even comically based on NT post dated script instead of OT.

Using this logic if Charles Manson fit 300 characteristics of Jesus without manipulating the characteristics or cheating like people do in emulating Moshiach then Charles Manson has to be Jesus according to Christian standards of reasoning. And since Charles Manson self trstified he was and does fulfill the coming of Jesus in over 300 ways then Jesus came back bringing division & as a murderer as he said he would in Matthew, Thomas, and Peter.
Since Jesus fulfilled over 300 verses on Satan then he must be Satan of the Bible.
Therefore Christianity standards and reasoning suggest Satan was Jesus and he came back as Charles Manson and your arguing this fact would suggest you are admitting Christianity's logic and reasoning on Moshiach is skewed.

Therfore moshiach claims must be forfeited and the standard to decipher MOshiach has to be re-evaluated and rediscovered by fulfillment of legitimate expectations that are Torah based not oral pagan borrowed traditions and self testimony.
Conclusion" Jesus either wasn't messiah like you thought or by your standards he had to be Satan, either way your character becomes the adversary and thief, thus either way he can be concluded as Satan.

FACT: Jesus is depicted like a long haired hippy in sandles.
Charles Manson claimed to be Jesus and was a hippy in sandles, we must take Manson for his word in even standard to Christians taking Jesus self testified word and claims.
Fact: they say Jesus is son of man & Charles is Man/son.
Fact: Jesus family said he was crazy
Manson and his family is crazy.
Jesus was a murderer from the begining who promised to not bring peace but to cause opposite through division describing a world inferno. Manson did the same with his race war he planed division chaos and worlds end in the same manner setting it a blaze.
Fact: Jesus asked his followers to disregard their parents for sake of him being their new family as did Manson.
Jesus lived in a shack so did Manson.
Jesus hated the Romans, Manson hsted Roman Polanski. Jesus took mushrooms as did his followers according to found texts, Manson did as well as his followers.
Cult leaderJesus had his apostles Manson had his cult flock called his family. Jesus lived and roamed the desert, so did Manson.

Using Christian logic & standards
Charlie Manson Was Jesus and Jesus was Lucifer cause all the verses on Lucifer were 100% fulfilled by the first fallen Christ.

To disagree is to admit the standard used to call him Moshiach is flawed making him Lucifer anyway.... this is called Check mate...
because every excuse maneuver you make out of this still means I got your king.
My kNight to your King= Check Mate!
That's why I use that term, so you'd notice your argument backed you in a corner with 0 excuses and maneuvers left.
All you can do is
1)cheat
2)pretend your mom is calling and run away
3) throw the chess board to the ground and have an ad hominem hissy fit like a child.
So far everyone seems to choose option 3.

I've met rocks that were smarter than you.

So you talk to rocks do you?
I thought pet rocks was just a late 70's fad?

 

[peach174]

Using Blackrooks standard:
Charlie Manson said he was Jesus, well according to Christian reasoning they can't argue against it without arguing against themselves and their own beliefs.
The logic used is merely through silly fallacious claims to Jesus being Messiah based merely on self testimony & saying he fit 300 prophecy, most of which aren't even messianic or properly read and stated. Some are even comically based on NT post dated script instead of OT.

Using this logic if Charles Manson fit 300 characteristics of Jesus without manipulating the characteristics or cheating like people do in emulating Moshiach then Charles Manson has to be Jesus according to Christian standards of reasoning. And since Charles Manson self trstified he was and does fulfill the coming of Jesus in over 300 ways then Jesus came back bringing division & as a murderer as he said he would in Matthew, Thomas, and Peter.
Since Jesus fulfilled over 300 verses on Satan then he must be Satan of the Bible.
Therefore Christianity standards and reasoning suggest Satan was Jesus and he came back as Charles Manson and your arguing this fact would suggest you are admitting Christianity's logic and reasoning on Moshiach is skewed.

Therfore moshiach claims must be forfeited and the standard to decipher MOshiach has to be re-evaluated and rediscovered by fulfillment of legitimate expectations that are Torah based not oral pagan borrowed traditions and self testimony.
Conclusion" Jesus either wasn't messiah like you thought or by your standards he had to be Satan, either way your character becomes the adversary and thief, thus either way he can be concluded as Satan.

FACT: Jesus is depicted like a long haired hippy in sandles.
Charles Manson claimed to be Jesus and was a hippy in sandles, we must take Manson for his word in even standard to Christians taking Jesus self testified word and claims.
Fact: they say Jesus is son of man & Charles is Man/son.
Fact: Jesus family said he was crazy
Manson and his family is crazy.
Jesus was a murderer from the begining who promised to not bring peace but to cause opposite through division describing a world inferno. Manson did the same with his race war he planed division chaos and worlds end in the same manner setting it a blaze.
Fact: Jesus asked his followers to disregard their parents for sake of him being their new family as did Manson.
Jesus lived in a shack so did Manson.
Jesus hated the Romans, Manson hsted Roman Polanski. Jesus took mushrooms as did his followers according to found texts, Manson did as well as his followers.
Cult leaderJesus had his apostles Manson had his cult flock called his family. Jesus lived and roamed the desert, so did Manson.

Using Christian logic & standards
Charlie Manson Was Jesus and Jesus was Lucifer cause all the verses on Lucifer were 100% fulfilled by the first fallen Christ.

To disagree is to admit the standard used to call him Moshiach is flawed making him Lucifer anyway.... this is called Check mate...
because every excuse maneuver you make out of this still means I got your king.
My kNight to your King= Check Mate!
That's why I use that term, so you'd notice your argument backed you in a corner with 0 excuses and maneuvers left.
All you can do is
1)cheat
2)pretend your mom is calling and run away
3) throw the chess board to the ground and have an ad hominem hissy fit like a child.
So far everyone seems to choose option 3.

I've met rocks that were smarter than you.

So you talk to rocks do you?
I thought pet rocks was just a late 70's fad?

Perhaps we have a language barrier here;
Maybe this will help, but then again, maybe not.
What does dumb as a box of rocks mean? dumb as a box of rocks Definition. Meaning of dumb as a box of rocks. OnlineSlangDictionary.com

 

[HaShev]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

 

[peach174]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

 

[HaShev]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

So you are saying the preacher who word for word used my post here on the refiners fire lesson on TBN 1-2 days ago was calling
someone dumber then a bag of rocks his Lord or was he just plagiarizing from someone dumber then rocks when he claimed his Lord revealed it to him?

Pssst, if rocks are dumb then why do you
revolve your lives around them? Your gold exchange,
your computer is made of substances found in the soil.

Giving a whole new insight & revelation to
The Golem legend.

Now it's your turn: what can you make with a bag of dumb rocks besides broken windows?
IF you know Christianity then tell us which era did your christ live in and what was his Hebrew name? Simple question.

 

[peach174]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

So you are saying the preacher who word for word used my post here on the refiners fire lesson on TBN 1-2 days ago was calling
someone dumber then a bag of rocks his Lord or was he just plagiarizing from someone dumber then rocks when he claimed his Lord revealed it to him?

Pssst, if rocks are dumb then why do you
revolve your lives around them? Your gold exchange,
your computer is made of substances found in the soil.

Giving a whole new insight & revelation to
The Golem legend.

Now it's your turn: what can you make with a bag of dumb rocks besides broken windows?
IF you know Christianity then tell us which era did your christ live in and what was his Hebrew name? Simple question.

First Century and he was called Yeshua son of Joseph

 

[HaShev]

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about.

But that is not what you both said, you took the low road and used an ad hominem
response that never articulated any point but insults, which is a common thread with both political & religious claims of tolerance.

Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

Christianity caused over thousands of wars and over 50 million murders.
Does the crusades, inquisition, and holocaust ring a bell?
We still see Christians attacking Jewish targets in our own country for worshiping the claimed same God.
If you worshiped the same God then why feel the need to lie, change wording, use propaganda, try and convert people away from YHWH to Jesus including the history of using force? And your post is proof of the abusive nature of your faith similar to Charlie Manson's family tactics.

 

[HaShev]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

So you are saying the preacher who word for word used my post here on the refiners fire lesson on TBN 1-2 days ago was calling
someone dumber then a bag of rocks his Lord or was he just plagiarizing from someone dumber then rocks when he claimed his Lord revealed it to him?

Pssst, if rocks are dumb then why do you
revolve your lives around them? Your gold exchange,
your computer is made of substances found in the soil.

Giving a whole new insight & revelation to
The Golem legend.

Now it's your turn: what can you make with a bag of dumb rocks besides broken windows?
IF you know Christianity then tell us which era did your christ live in and what was his Hebrew name? Simple question.

First Century and he was called Yeshua son of Joseph

Wrong, which means you not only wasted your time arguing over rocks, you proved to the forum that you are deflecting.
The only AD era Christ was THEUDAS by the Jordan who's apostles were the martyrs, the christ figure named Yeshu not Y'shua (which is pronounced HaSheva as Y=H sound which is why book of Joshua is called Hoshea) lived in 100bc.
In other words you used my name for your Christ and weren't smart enough to know you were doing it. That makes you dumber then the guy dumber then a bag of rocks.
Thanks for playing the watch who you say things to game. ;-)

 

[peach174]

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about.

But that is not what you both said, you took the low road and used an ad hominem
response that never articulated any point but insults, which is a common thread with both political & religious claims of tolerance.

Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

Christianity caused over thousands of wars and over 50 million murders.
Does the crusades, inquisition, and holocaust ring a bell?
We still see Christians attacking Jewish targets in our own country for worshiping the claimed same God.
If you worshiped the same God then why feel the need to lie, change wording, use propaganda, try and convert people away from YHWH to Jesus including the history of using force? And your post is proof of the abusive nature of your faith similar to Charlie Manson's family tactics.

Those are the very Christians that the lord said he never knew them.
Crusaders rose up the fight Muslims that was taking over a holy site scared to all 3 religions.
Inquisition was run by a bunch on insane Catholics.
The holocaust was also run by a bunch of insane non christians who used Christianity to rule over the people.
It was about the Aryan blood line running the world.
All of Christianity does not represent the insane power hungry few.

 

[peach174]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

So you are saying the preacher who word for word used my post here on the refiners fire lesson on TBN 1-2 days ago was calling
someone dumber then a bag of rocks his Lord or was he just plagiarizing from someone dumber then rocks when he claimed his Lord revealed it to him?

Pssst, if rocks are dumb then why do you
revolve your lives around them? Your gold exchange,
your computer is made of substances found in the soil.

Giving a whole new insight & revelation to
The Golem legend.

Now it's your turn: what can you make with a bag of dumb rocks besides broken windows?
IF you know Christianity then tell us which era did your christ live in and what was his Hebrew name? Simple question.

First Century and he was called Yeshua son of Joseph

Wrong, which means you not only wasted your time arguing over rocks, you proved to the forum that you are deflecting.
The only AD era Christ was THEUDAS by the Jordan who's apostles were the martyrs, the christ figure named Yeshu not Y'shua (which is pronounced HaSheva as Y=H sound which is why book of Joshua is called Hoshea) lived in 100bc.
In other words you used my name for your Christ and weren't smart enough to know you were doing it. That makes you dumber then the guy dumber then a bag of rocks.
Thanks for playing the watch who you say things to game. ;-)

Wrong Theudas died in 46AD who was a jewish rebel.
Jesus died in 33 AD

 

[HaShev]

Are you guys saying Christians don't like dumb people? HOW can a ministry survive without them and their baal harvest "seed" money?
Or are you saying Christians hate people with brain damage, trauma, or born that way as a means of feeling inadequate in comparison?
And what about people like Palestinians that throw rocks?
Are you saying they are throwing away their superior mentors or are they throwing away their pets?

No we're saying you have no clue what Christianity really is about and you have no brain, like a rock has none, because you don't know what your talking about.
Christians are not the haters of anyone.
Christians are not the religion beheading people because they refuse to be Christians.

So you are saying the preacher who word for word used my post here on the refiners fire lesson on TBN 1-2 days ago was calling
someone dumber then a bag of rocks his Lord or was he just plagiarizing from someone dumber then rocks when he claimed his Lord revealed it to him?

Pssst, if rocks are dumb then why do you
revolve your lives around them? Your gold exchange,
your computer is made of substances found in the soil.

Giving a whole new insight & revelation to
The Golem legend.

Now it's your turn: what can you make with a bag of dumb rocks besides broken windows?
IF you know Christianity then tell us which era did your christ live in and what was his Hebrew name? Simple question.

First Century and he was called Yeshua son of Joseph

Wrong, which means you not only wasted your time arguing over rocks, you proved to the forum that you are deflecting.
The only AD era Christ was THEUDAS by the Jordan who's apostles were the martyrs, the christ figure named Yeshu not Y'shua (which is pronounced HaSheva as Y=H sound which is why book of Joshua is called Hoshea) lived in 100bc.
In other words you used my name for your Christ and weren't smart enough to know you were doing it. That makes you dumber then the guy dumber then a bag of rocks.
Thanks for playing the watch who you say things to game. ;-)

Wrong Theudas died in 46AD who was a jewish rebel.
Jesus died in 33 AD

John said his christ was closer to 50 y.o. then 40-(John 8:57). They moved his Birthdate to 6bc to fit the Herod story but that too failed to fit the 7bc census and Lysanias that died in 35bc . Jesus is not historical, they use a few historical figures to make him seem to be.