The Left Wing Media Hides All That.

[Camp]

Cherry picking again? SHow me all the MSM stories back in 2007 questioning whether Obama was really qualified to be president given his thin resume.

You hate it when you get caught lying. And the American people decide if a candidate is qualified for an elected position, not you or the media or anyone else. We have a constitution that lets us make that decision when we vote. If you don't love that system, leave it.

Failed that challenge, too eh? If I ever get caught lying I'll let you know. Since I dont lie, it wont happen.

I didn't fail any challenge you nut job. You think you can get somebody to dig up sources and links back to 2007 to help you make a point you are unable to make yourself is a normal rational expectation? Prove your own point. You won't because you can't.
Why can't you just take getting caught as a liar like a man and just move on? Maybe make an apology for being mistaken. Why must you behave like the child with his hand stuck in the cookie jar as he denies attempting to steal cookies? This means you are either a child or just a person of low moral character. Which one is it?

 

[The Rabbi]

You hate it when you get caught lying. And the American people decide if a candidate is qualified for an elected position, not you or the media or anyone else. We have a constitution that lets us make that decision when we vote. If you don't love that system, leave it.

Failed that challenge, too eh? If I ever get caught lying I'll let you know. Since I dont lie, it wont happen.

I didn't fail any challenge you nut job. You think you can get somebody to dig up sources and links back to 2007 to help you make a point you are unable to make yourself is a normal rational expectation? Prove your own point. You won't because you can't.
Why can't you just take getting caught as a liar like a man and just move on? Maybe make an apology for being mistaken. Why must you behave like the child with his hand stuck in the cookie jar as he denies attempting to steal cookies? This means you are either a child or just a person of low moral character. Which one is it?

You cherry pick data and when I point out that no MSM org even questioned whether Obama was really qualified you deflect to something else.
You are a piss poor poster and a dishonest piece of flung monkey crap.

 

[sealybobo]

Conservative Americans don't think the answer to all of the foibles of human nature is an all-powerful central government in Washington. But, they do expect Washington to perform its basic constitutional duties...which include defending the border from illegal invasion.

Here are some things that seem to be true, in spite of the haze created by a Media which is almost completely under the control of a Democratic Party which routinely employs obfuscation as a means to an end.

1) Deportations by the Obama Administration are not at the highest all-time. The Obama Administration has simply changed the method of counting deportations. In Soviet Union Politboro propaganda style, they count the ones met at the border and immediately turned around...in effect never allowed in the country to begin with...which was never done before. If the old method was used, Obama's deportations are way down from prior administrations...which is in keeping with his real aim, which is to let as many in as possible; to put them on the Federal Free Stuff Program..and thus turn them into reliable Democratic Voters.

The left Wing Media hides that.

2) Before Obama's illegal Executive Order which let illegal minors stay in the country, children coming from Central America was about 4,000 a year, and therafter it increased geometrically to 50,000 this year. It is obvious to any rational person that Obama's illegal act caused the crisis we have today.

The Left Wing Media hides that.

3) The omnibus Illegal Immigration Law that is tied up in the House handles long term Immigration issues...by granting what amounts to amnesty. It would generate lots of new Democratic Voters, but would do nothing to stop the immediate crisis that is currently at issue--the one Obama has caused with his illegal act. But, Obama pretends that is is the answer--if Republican would just pass it.

The Left Wing Media lets him get away with it.

4) The massive amount of Money which Obama has asked for to stop the crisis he caused, will also do nothing to stop the current invasion...it basically builds an infrastructure to keep processing the massive number of illegal aliens who will continue if this current batch is not sent back immediately.

The Left Wing Media hides that.

Two and a half years to go. Will the Media wake up in time to save this country from this incompetent and corrupt Administration?

I don't even need to read your stupid list of examples. These are, I bet, all wedge issues used to divide us. I have no doubt the GOP is behind all these kids coming into America in an election year. No doubt drummed up to stir up the base and win over new voters on the "I hate illegal mexicans" wedge issue.

The media is corporate owned and controlled you fool. If it was liberal, it wasn't after Clinton handed them the Telecommunication Act of 1998. That's when 7 mega corporations bought up all the media channels and they are using them to manipulate you just like Facebook.

They may act liberal on things like gays and abortion, but that's just to stir you up you fool.

 

[sealybobo]

P.S. The Telecomm Act of 98 was necessary for the GOP. Without it they wouldn't have been able to lie us into Iraq. That's how powerful the media is.

 

[whitehall]

The Country is doomed when the education system keeps kids stupid and the mainstream media becomes the propaganda arm of the administration.

 

[Pogo]

Jeffrey Immelt, GE.
]

Jeffrey Immelt is a registered Republican. Nice list though.

Immelt is one of Obama's advisors and supporters. No list would satisfy you because your mind is made up. Anyone who thinks the story choices and the angle put on them by writers and editors does not reflect their left wing bias is simply willfully blind.

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

 

[The Rabbi]

Jeffrey Immelt is a registered Republican. Nice list though.

Immelt is one of Obama's advisors and supporters. No list would satisfy you because your mind is made up. Anyone who thinks the story choices and the angle put on them by writers and editors does not reflect their left wing bias is simply willfully blind.

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

Please show me all the critical stories of Obama back from 2007-2008.

 

[Pogo]

Immelt is one of Obama's advisors and supporters. No list would satisfy you because your mind is made up. Anyone who thinks the story choices and the angle put on them by writers and editors does not reflect their left wing bias is simply willfully blind.

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

Please show me all the critical stories of Obama back from 2007-2008.

Please show me all the critical stories on Shrub back from 2000-2001.

Did I not just say "take your time"? You're still completely missing the point, asking the wrong questions. See post 25. Here's a link.

And here's a hint:

In another thread we were taking apart certain quotes for possible racial content: one of those proposed was this, from Joe Biden (2007) on the field of his party's candidates:

"I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's storybook, man."​

Your hint, this time, is not in the first part or the middle. Your hint is in the last sentence.

Plug that in to post 25, do the math, lather, rinse, repeat.

Take your time...

 

[Camp]

Immelt is one of Obama's advisors and supporters. No list would satisfy you because your mind is made up. Anyone who thinks the story choices and the angle put on them by writers and editors does not reflect their left wing bias is simply willfully blind.

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

Please show me all the critical stories of Obama back from 2007-2008.

Quit the play act like it is hard to find. Just google Obama not qualified 2007 and you get endless pages of articles. But you have to wade through the birther ones and might end up reading a lot of pro Hillary pieces.
The second one on the first page is from the Chicago Tribune, the next one is from Sarah Palin and the one after that is a youtube video of Obama himself saying he felt unqualified in 2004.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I don't think you understand how media works. Big Media (hereinafter "BM"®) is no more interested in "hiding" something or "steering" a political dialogue than Big Oil is interested in providing cheap gas. It's interested in making money for itself. That's it. Why do you think we have Entertainment Tonight and endless yammering about how Michael Jackson died and the next missing white girl?

BM (i.e. the vidiot screen) is neither interested in, nor capable of, a legitimate examination of the kind of nuanced nuts and bolts as in your OP here. So they won't bother. If they're forced to address it at all they will find the most watered down, übersimplified, emotional bite-size nuggets way they can possibly describe it -- because going into the kinds of details you can put in a post or a Wiki page will cause audience's eyes to glaze over and tune out, and that's absolutely verboten. Audience (in mass numbers) doesn't want that. It wants the personally emotional. It wants immediate gratification. What it does NOT want is to have to think. And BM doesn't want that either -- because if you start thinking, you won't be receptive to this word about why you need Viagra.

The idea that there's some kind of BM-Central with a man behind a curtain editing everything for political content is a myth, and a damn silly one. BM sells what will sell. Period. That's why it's called a 'vast wasteland'. It's the price of commercial news; when your objective is the almighty Dollar, that's the master you serve.

What an astoundingly ignorant post.

You claim to not be pissing in our face while still in full stream....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Those who do get the final say are equally liberal.
Your squashing has been squashed. An examination of news stories over time finds significant liberal bias in all of it.

Absolotely false. Care to give me a list of these so called liberal CEO's of news orginzations and their major sponsors who pay their bills.

I realize that you're stupid - ergo you are a leftist....

CEO's don't have any impact on content.

Care to show me an MSM EDITOR who is NOT a flaming leftist? You know, the ones who actually DO dictate content?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Jeffrey Immelt is a registered Republican. Nice list though.

Immelt is a registered Republican?

You got that the old democrat way, you made it up.

{In February 2009, Immelt was appointed as a member to the President's Economic Recovery Advisory Board to provide the president and his administration with advice and counsel in fixing America's economic downturn.[14] When President Obama chose to put Jeffrey Immelt at the head of the Economic Advisory Board, he felt that Immelt had attributions in knowing what would help the global economy. Obama has reported that Immelt has emerged as one of his top economic advisors in regards to trying to rebuild America's economy.[15]

On January 21, 2011, President Obama announced Immelt's appointment as chairman of his outside panel of economic advisers, succeeding former Federal Reserve chairman Paul Volcker.[16] The New York Times reported that Obama's appointment of Immelt was "another strong signal that he intends to make the White House more business-friendly."[16] Immelt will retain his post at GE while becoming "chairman of the Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, a newly named panel that President Obama is creating by executive order."[16] Despite this, in July 2011 Immelt's General Electric announced that it is in the process of relocating its X-ray division from Wisconsin to China.[17][18] Immelt had previously referred to China as GE's "second home market".[17]}

Jeffrey R. Immelt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey, there may be a democrat somewhere who isn't a ******* liar.

And there may be bigfoot....

Dude, you're not stupid because you're a leftist; you're a leftist because you're stupid.

 

[Ernie S.]

The Left Wing Media Hides All That.

Fail.

There is no such thing as the 'left wing media,' and consequently nothing is being 'hidden.'

The only ones who could possibly believe that crock of shit are those so far left they see Hillary Clinton as a John Bircher.

Conservative Americans don't think the answer to all of the foibles of human nature is an all-powerful central government in Washington.

The same is true of liberal Americans.

I won't dignify that with comment other than BULLSHIT!

But, they do expect Washington to perform its basic constitutional duties...which include defending the border from illegal invasion.

Fail.

The issue doesn't constitute an 'invasion,' 'illegal' or otherwise.

I guess the millions that are crossing our border illegally are not an invasion because they don't carry rifles and wear uniforms? This is not a military invasion, but Mexico and Central America are sending us the dregs of their society with all the associated crime and disease. We damned well better treat it like and invasion. I could go on and on about what illegal immigration costs in human as well as financial hardships, but I'll just toss out one budget item. Incarceration of illegals who have committed crimes since sneaking in under cover of darkness costs about 16 Billion/year That doesn't include ICE detention facilities that spend another 2 billion.

'Washington' is addressing the issue to the best of its abilities, in accordance with the Constitution, its case law, and Federal immigration law – and in the context of the limited, restricted resources at its disposal. Indeed, it's republican lawmakers who are refusing to authorize the funds requested by the president to allow DHS to adequately address the problem.

I suppose you're right, there, given the competence so far displayed by the current administration.

We'll authorize the funds when there is a plan to properly address the problem. The obama Administrations definition of 'adequately' is frankly, inadequate.

 

[Pogo]

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

Please show me all the critical stories of Obama back from 2007-2008.

Quit the play act like it is hard to find. Just google Obama not qualified 2007 and you get endless pages of articles. But you have to wade through the birther ones and might end up reading a lot of pro Hillary pieces.
The second one on the first page is from the Chicago Tribune, the next one is from Sarah Palin and the one after that is a youtube video of Obama himself saying he felt unqualified in 2004.

That's true; I didn't even think of the birfers. Where are the media callouts for Bush's birth certificate? (or more directly compared, McCain's)?

What they don't get is the common thread. A mysterious birth certificate, to some extent, sells. Bush being AWOL in the early '70s... not so much.

Bush's myriad malapops also sell. Dan Quayle taught us that. Joe Biden and Sarah Palin keep that flame burning today.

Just as the storybook (<< hint) script of a black man, who would have been under real threat of lynching at the drop of a hat a century earlier, getting within the White House, sells. Big time.

Just as the backstory on another candidate sells as long as you ignore his policies and concentrate on who he was boinking in the governor's office in Little Rock and whether he 'inhaled'. Just as any number of other would-be candidates got shouted out of the process on the same basis, from Hermann Cain to Anthony Weiner to Rudy Giuliani to Gary Hart. Because scandal sells. Just as the vision of the kindly old grandfather with the measured voice intoning "morning in America"... sells. Just as an honest religious peanut farmer in the wake of political scandal sells; just as the vibrant youthful boyish candidate against the Five O'Clock shadow sells.... just as the World War II hero sells... Etc etc etc.

See the pattern. It's never about the policy; it's always about the personal. Because the superficial, all together now..... sells.

 

[Uncensored2008]

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?

Don't be stupid, huffer.

There is nothing remotely "right wing" about Immelt, or the other well connected looters such as George Soros, Politico CEO Frederick J. Ryan Jr., Ultra-left Intel CEO Andrew Grove, Ursala Burns, the CEO of Xerox, Larry Ellison of Oracle, Warren Buffet, etc.

The left exists to concentrate wealth and power into the hands of a tiny elite, just as these corporate giants seek. Collectivism is ultimately the collection of all assets for the benefit of the ruling elite.

Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

You have a skewed and ignorant view of right and left. The concentration of all assets in the hands of the ruling elite is the persistent goal of the left, a manifestation of "to each according to his need." The elite will dole out what they think the peasants need. Ellison famously stated as much when he defended Apple practices in China (he, along with Al Gore, are on the Apple BOD - leftists and evil tend to draw each other) that the best situation is if employees are not paid at all, the company will provide housing, food, and medical care. Oddly, the Foxxcon slaves weren't as happy with the arrangement.

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.
Drones....

I assume you think you have a point?

 

[The Rabbi]

Fifty examples of liberal bias spanning the decades. Yeah tell me it doesnt exist.
The Top 50 Liberal Media Bias Examples

 

[Ernie S.]

Con strategy - when there's no news find a way to make news

Then say the world is unfair when no one pays attention to your "news"

Rinse and repeat until you've duped your frothing base into feeling like victims of a "left wing media conspiracy"

Been reading HuffPoo again, I see.

Pardon me, but you're "frothing" all over yourself. (Or was the irony intentional?)

 

[The Rabbi]

These two pieces of info in concert tell you what?

That Jeffrey Immelt is for some reason presenting a right-wing front while secretly engaged in a communist conspiracy to install Kenyan sociofascist usurpers in order to enslave the masses for the glory of Chairman Mao?


Or that the two "parties" are not two at all but subtle variations on a single rightward-leaning double-party that works to the same goals and that your scriptwriters lied to you when they instruct you to paint O'bama as a Kenyan sociaofascist usurper in the first place because what we live in is a corporatocracy presenting an illusion of two parties to keep the gullible bickering with each other instead of challenging the PTB, a scheme in which you stand a proud minion?

Think Tim Geithner.
Think Michael Taylor.
Think Tom Wheeler.


Take your time.

Maybe it's not readily apparent. Because you know, the "left wing media" hides all that.



Drones....

Please show me all the critical stories of Obama back from 2007-2008.

Quit the play act like it is hard to find. Just google Obama not qualified 2007 and you get endless pages of articles. But you have to wade through the birther ones and might end up reading a lot of pro Hillary pieces.
The second one on the first page is from the Chicago Tribune, the next one is from Sarah Palin and the one after that is a youtube video of Obama himself saying he felt unqualified in 2004.

Fail. Move the goalposts to win is an automatic fail. I asked for MSM stories. There aren't any. How do I know? Because if there were you would have posted them instead of moving the goalposts.
You lose.

 

[The Rabbi]

Con strategy - when there's no news find a way to make news

Then say the world is unfair when no one pays attention to your "news"

Rinse and repeat until you've duped your frothing base into feeling like victims of a "left wing media conspiracy"

Been reading HuffPoo again, I see.

Pardon me, but you're "frothing" all over yourself. (Or was the irony intentional?)

Dude's like 19 years old. No one takes him seriously.

 

[sealybobo]

The Country is doomed when the education system keeps kids stupid and the mainstream media becomes the propaganda arm of the administration.

Then the country is doomed because think about it. The rich/corporations own our government, the rich own/control the media.

The people are being bamboozled no doubt. But to suggest that it is the Democrats that are to blame is insulting. Come on liars. Sure the Democrats have to cater to the unions and left wing lobbyists, but what do you have in common with the rich/corporations? They don't like you. You are an expensive cog in their corporations. They'd much rather have a cheaper cost Asian, Russian, African, S. American, European or Indian doing the work for less. Doesn't matter what you do, you are over paid all of you if you are an American doing a job that could be done cheaper somewhere else. Pit the American workers against 3rd world labor. Destroy American Unions so workers have no one to lobby for them.

How does this benefit any of you worker bees? It won't. We're seeing the result of Bushonomics now, not Obama. How is Bushanomics benefitting you? Seniors taxes went up, everyone is being asked to pay for the roads, meanwhile corporations and rich are getting tax breaks. How you benefitting? You're not. You are a slave to the Corporation. Isn't that Fascism?