The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

The gaping exit and skull detaching appears between 312-313, 313-314, and 316-317. They did their best to hide the hole but slow motion exposes it and the attempts to hide that hole. The bottom gif shows rear skull detaching.

In between 316-317 a ghost-like image shows the white lane through jfk's head. That hole closes up by 317.
IMAGES EDITED FOR GRAPHIC CONTENT - AVG-JOE
bj.gif
 
-There is nothing even remotely unclear or vague about Greer killing Jfk. That's a simple cop-out...nothing less.
-He passes the covered gun in Zapruder and Nix completes the movements of his left arm crossing when he shoots Kennedy. Greer's arm crossing was covered with ridiculous fake reflections for the only film, Zapruder, that had widespread use and was viewed by millions.

-There is nothing gruesome about jfk's headshot because the red blotch is fake. It is quite simply a cartoon forgery committed by 1960's idiots.
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.

-I'm not interested in why he was assassinated because Greer killing Kennedy proves an inside job all by itself. I don't care why he was killed, only that he was killed by the secret service, therefore his own administration.

-Some people want to know my motivation. I posted the evidence to forty or fifty forums so people could see how obvious and silly this cover-up and assassination of an American President really was and is.

-The jfk cover-up is solved and proven beyond any doubt because of the nix film and my determination to point out overwhelming evidence that has been available for decades. The conspiracy theorists are most responsible for this lingering for almost 50 years. The information age solved this case.
bj.gif
 
If Greer didn't shoot jfk then why did he pass a covered object before the shot [and that same object was seen magically going to floor after the shot?

Who the hell knows why, or even if that is what he did? For all you know, Greer could have been jerking off with a jelly donut. Do you realy think that barely perceptible and highly speculative and subjective interpretation of such subtle action in a blurry 8mm enlargement amounts to conclusive evidence of anything?

It doesn't.

What is more, it doesn't matter; unless you can argue that the "covered object" which Greer was supposedly passing prior to the head shot could possibly have been a high-powered rifle, which you obviously cannot.

That head shot did not come from any handgun which a Secret Service Agent might possibly be carrying. That is the bottom line. You can go on and on about bleach spots and covered objects all you want. It is moot. JFK was not shot in the head with a handgun.
 
Last edited:
The old man on the stairs literally points at Greer after he shoots Kennedy and then drops his arms as if to say, "I just saw the government kill Kennedy and there's not a damn thing I can do about it." You can also see Greer's left arm/elbow coming down after he shot jfk.

Muchmore2.gif

old-man-sees-greer_h_GIFSoupcom.gif
golly couldn't just be pointing at the car.
and maybe thinking oh SHIT!
the rest is wishful thinking.
and it give you a very small wood ,more like a splinter!
 
In case all of this that I just said is too complicated for you to understand troll.in short dumbfuck,until you admit you are trolling with this disproven shot in the back of the head bullshit crap which you have...

Yeah, yeah, yeah...

Will someone please take this snot-nosed kid out to the woodshed? He is getting on my nerves.

...and use an extra thick switch this time.
 
In case all of this that I just said is too complicated for you to understand troll.in short dumbfuck,until you admit you are trolling with this disproven shot in the back of the head bullshit crap which you have...

Yeah, yeah, yeah...

Will someone please take this snot-nosed kid out to the woodshed? He is getting on my nerves.

...and use an extra thick switch this time.
too bad we can't
 
-There is nothing even remotely unclear or vague about Greer killing Jfk. That's a simple cop-out...nothing less.
-He passes the covered gun in Zapruder and Nix completes the movements of his left arm crossing when he shoots Kennedy. Greer's arm crossing was covered with ridiculous fake reflections for the only film, Zapruder, that had widespread use and was viewed by millions.

-There is nothing gruesome about jfk's headshot because the red blotch is fake. It is quite simply a cartoon forgery committed by 1960's idiots.
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.

-I'm not interested in why he was assassinated because Greer killing Kennedy proves an inside job all by itself. I don't care why he was killed, only that he was killed by the secret service, therefore his own administration.

-Some people want to know my motivation. I posted the evidence to forty or fifty forums so people could see how obvious and silly this cover-up and assassination of an American President really was and is.

-The jfk cover-up is solved and proven beyond any doubt because of the nix film and my determination to point out overwhelming evidence that has been available for decades. The conspiracy theorists are most responsible for this lingering for almost 50 years. The information age solved this case.
Yeah, you are a sick ****.
 
The old man on the stairs literally points at Greer after he shoots Kennedy and then drops his arms as if to say, "I just saw the government kill Kennedy and there's not a damn thing I can do about it."
:rofl:

I think it's hilarious that you put words in someone else's mouth and then use it to prove your own ridiculous assertion.
 
If Greer didn't shoot jfk then why did he pass a covered object before the shot [and that same object was seen magically going to floor after the shot?

Who the hell knows why, or even if that is what he did? For all you know, Greer could have been jerking off with a jelly donut. Do you realy think that barely perceptible and highly speculative and subjective interpretation of such subtle action in a blurry 8mm enlargement amounts to conclusive evidence of anything?

It doesn't.

What is more, it doesn't matter; unless you can argue that the "covered object" which Greer was supposedly passing prior to the head shot could possibly have been a high-powered rifle, which you obviously cannot.

That head shot did not come from any handgun which a Secret Service Agent might possibly be carrying. That is the bottom line. You can go on and on about bleach spots and covered objects all you want. It is moot. JFK was not shot in the head with a handgun.

None of what you've said changes anything. Greer fired an at close range shot with most likely a 38 revolver. There were witnesses who reported a gun in or around the limo. The old man's just a bonus for what the three films prove.
 
The old man on the stairs literally points at Greer after he shoots Kennedy and then drops his arms as if to say, "I just saw the government kill Kennedy and there's not a damn thing I can do about it."
:rofl:

I think it's hilarious that you put words in someone else's mouth and then use it to prove your own ridiculous assertion.
he must be physic!
 
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.
By the way, why the hell should anyone listen to you if you can't even keep straight who was shot? Moron.
 
None of what you've said changes anything. Greer fired an at close range shot with most likely a 38 revolver. There were witnesses who reported a gun in or around the limo. The old man's just a bonus for what the three films prove.
If you knew anything at all about criminal investigations and prosecutions, you would know how unreliable witness testimony is. People see all sorts of shit in stressful situations, which, of course, helps losers who want attention on the Internet because they can cherry-pick the witness testimony that supports them and reject the rest.
 
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.

Ludicrous! NONE of the Dallas doctors noticed an entrance wound over the right eye?
 
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.

Ludicrous! NONE of the Dallas doctors noticed an entrance wound over the right eye?
They were too busy planting evidence to notice someone else had a massive head wound. It's such a cover up that not even Greer himself knew he was shot. :rofl:
 
-Greer had a small entrance wound over the right eye with a gaping exit on the right rear...that's it.

Ludicrous! NONE of the Dallas doctors noticed an entrance wound over the right eye?
They were too busy planting evidence to notice someone else had a massive head wound. It's such a cover up that not even Greer himself knew he was shot. :rofl:

Including Dr. George Burkley, JFKÂ’s personal physician, who was with the President in Dallas, witnessed the trauma room procedures, signed the President's Certificate of Death, accompanied the body to Bethesda and was there for the autopsy...

zh4ee4af15.gif


The plot thickens...:eek:
 
15th post
Ludicrous! NONE of the Dallas doctors noticed an entrance wound over the right eye?
They were too busy planting evidence to notice someone else had a massive head wound. It's such a cover up that not even Greer himself knew he was shot. :rofl:

Including Dr. George Burkley, JFKÂ’s personal physician, who was with the President in Dallas, witnessed the trauma room procedures, signed the President's Certificate of Death, accompanied the body to Bethesda and was there for the autopsy...

zh4ee4af15.gif


The plot thickens...:eek:
Clearly this is of the CIA's doing.

Why? Because I said so, and anyone else who thinks differently is a troll.
 
They were too busy planting evidence to notice someone else had a massive head wound. It's such a cover up that not even Greer himself knew he was shot. :rofl:

Including Dr. George Burkley, JFKÂ’s personal physician, who was with the President in Dallas, witnessed the trauma room procedures, signed the President's Certificate of Death, accompanied the body to Bethesda and was there for the autopsy...

zh4ee4af15.gif


The plot thickens...:eek:
Clearly this is of the CIA's doing.

Why? Because I said so, and anyone else who thinks differently is a troll.
No i'm a troll.:D
 
if greer didn't shoot jfk then why did he pass a covered object before the shot [and that same object was seen magically going to floor after the shot?

who the hell knows why, or even if that is what he did? For all you know, greer could have been jerking off with a jelly donut. Do you realy think that barely perceptible and highly speculative and subjective interpretation of such subtle action in a blurry 8mm enlargement amounts to conclusive evidence of anything?

It doesn't.

What is more, it doesn't matter; unless you can argue that the "covered object" which greer was supposedly passing prior to the head shot could possibly have been a high-powered rifle, which you obviously cannot.

That head shot did not come from any handgun which a secret service agent might possibly be carrying. That is the bottom line. You can go on and on about bleach spots and covered objects all you want. It is moot. jfk was not shot in the head with a handgun.

none of what you've said changes anything. Greer fired an at close range shot with most likely a 38 revolver. There were witnesses who reported a gun in or around the limo. The old man's just a bonus for what the three films prove.

Does that look like the effects of a .38 revolver at close range, or any range???

Do you have any idea what you are talking about???

JFK was not shot in the head with a .38 revolver, numnutz!!!!



Bloody ******* hell!! You have got to be the stupidest person on the face of the earth!!
 
who the hell knows why, or even if that is what he did? For all you know, greer could have been jerking off with a jelly donut. Do you realy think that barely perceptible and highly speculative and subjective interpretation of such subtle action in a blurry 8mm enlargement amounts to conclusive evidence of anything?

It doesn't.

What is more, it doesn't matter; unless you can argue that the "covered object" which greer was supposedly passing prior to the head shot could possibly have been a high-powered rifle, which you obviously cannot.

That head shot did not come from any handgun which a secret service agent might possibly be carrying. That is the bottom line. You can go on and on about bleach spots and covered objects all you want. It is moot. jfk was not shot in the head with a handgun.

none of what you've said changes anything. Greer fired an at close range shot with most likely a 38 revolver. There were witnesses who reported a gun in or around the limo. The old man's just a bonus for what the three films prove.

Does that look like the effects of a .38 revolver at close range, or any range???

Do you have any idea what you are talking about???

JFK was not shot in the head with a .38 revolver, numnutz!!!!



Bloody ******* hell!! You have got to be the stupidest person on the face of the earth!!
It's quite obvious that 7Foreskin knows NOTHING about firearms. BTW, he actually STEALS the information he posts which is hilarious considering that it is total bullshit. :badgrin:
 
Back
Top Bottom