The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. 1. or 2.
2.Thats all I ask.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[7forever]

Greer's left arm crossing in the Nix film and the fake reflection in Zapruder are in perfect sync with the headshot.

FRAMES 312-313

Watch the fake reflection extend in perfect sync with the fake red mist/blotch. The fake reflections simply mimic what Greer's true movements did when shooting jfk.

 

[Liability]

Greer's left arm crossing in the Nix film and the fake reflection in Zapruder are in perfect sync with the headshot.

FRAMES 312-313

Watch the fake reflection extend in perfect sync with the fake red mist/blotch. The fake reflections simply mimic what Greer's true movements did when shooting jfk.

Bullshit. IF the driver done it (and that's impossible for a whole variety of reasons) but just to follow your willy line of logic:

IF the driver had shot the President, then why did the President's head go back and to his left?

According to the ridiculous crap theory you postulate, 7forNever, one would "expect" the President's head to have gone back and to his RIGHT since the alleged "shooter" was in front of him and to HIS left.

You sub-morons MOCK derisively the Warren Commission conclusion that the President's head may have gone back and to the left (despite having been shot from behind and to his right) due to the neuro-muscular reaction to the brain trauma. You idiots INSIST that Newtonian physics ALONE can predict how the head will react to the impact of the fatal shot.

Well, if you REALLY believe that, then YOU must assume that the President's head flew back forcefully in the wrong direction.

If it could do that in one case (the driver done it scenario) then there's no reason it couldn't also have done that under the other scenario (the book depository shot).

So which is it? Are the laws of Newtonian physics subject to some exceptions when the brain is traumatically injured? Or are you willing to admit that the driver couldn't have done it?

 

[StashMan]

Greer's left arm crossing in the Nix film and the fake reflection in Zapruder are in perfect sync with the headshot.

FRAMES 312-313

Watch the fake reflection extend in perfect sync with the fake red mist/blotch. The fake reflections simply mimic what Greer's true movements did when shooting jfk.

It seems to me that Greer's arm has been lowered back in place before Kennedy's head goes back from the impact. No one is faster than a bullet. We all agree that there was indeed a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, and all we do is fight each other than to banned together and do what we should and try to get another investigation into this matter.
I do think the Greer issue should be looked into, but than so should all the others.

 

[7forever]

Moorman's affadavit supports the dummie shot that followed the driver shooting at 313. She took the pic 1/5 a second before the fatal shot and then heard another one. The last shot was fired to provide a red herring for the witnesses that remained on elm near the limo. THE LAST SHOT WAS A DUMMIE SHOT to confuse people and give them an alternative location for the fatal shot.


Mary Moorman's Affidavit (back to the list of witnesses)
Mrs. Jean Hill and I were standing on the grass by the park on Elm Street between the underpass and the corner of Elm & Houston. I had a Polaroid Camera with me and was intending to take pictures of President Kennedy and the motorcade. As the motorcade started toward me I took two pictures. As President Kennedy was opposite me I took a picture of him. As I snapped the picture of President Kennedy, I heard a shot ring out. President Kennedy kind of slumped over. Then I heard another shot ring out and Mrs. Kennedy jumped up in the car and said, "My God he had been shot." When I heard these shots ring out, I fell to the ground to keep from being hit myself. I heard three or four shots in all. After the pictures I took were developed, the Picture of President Kennedy showed him slumped over. When the pictures were developed, they came out real light. These pictures have been turned over to Officers investigating this incident.

1. 147-160 missed
2. 225 from front hit Kennedy in throat
3. 234 Connally struck in back from behind
4. 313 Driver fires fatal shot
5. 323 give or take a few frames; a shot was fired from the fence/knoll immediately after Greer fired to confuse people standing on elm about the fatal shot coming from inside the limo. IT WAS A DUMMIE SHOT.

 

[7forever]

Greer's left arm crossing in the Nix film and the fake reflection in Zapruder are in perfect sync with the headshot.

[/quote]


It seems to me that Greer's arm has been lowered back in place before Kennedy's head goes back from the impact. No one is faster than a bullet. We all agree that there was indeed a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, and all we do is fight each other than to banned together and do what we should and try to get another investigation into this matter.
[B]I do think the Greer issue should be looked into, but than so should all the others[/B].[/QUOTE]

I can't argue much with that but the issue at hand is convoluted but his left hand did not return to the wheel after he passed the gun in Z. [B]The irrefutable proof it's fake is seeing his left shoulder rotate swiftly to the right in nix and muchmore. The hand in zframe 304 [/B][B]is fake[/B]. The disinfo crowds simply ignored Greer passing the gun and skipped to the fake hand BS.:eusa_liar:

 

[Rationalist1016]

Sorry bout that,


1. 1. or 2.
2.Thats all I ask.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

He's not going to answer that question. Trust me, I've already tried to get simple answers to simple questions........................not going to happen.

The question that I never got answered was "how could Greer have shot THROUGH Connolly? I contend that Connolly is up against his wife at the time of the fatal shot which puts him right in the line of fired. He posts a drawing that shows the shot being fired between Mr & Mrs Connolly. The video clearly shows Connolly in the line of fire.
Plus, Greer supposedly pulls this off by shooting over his right shoulder, not being able to aim the weapon, while driving!

So, good luck with any questions!

 

[7forever]

Sorry bout that,


1. 1. or 2.
2.Thats all I ask.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

He's not going to answer that question. Trust me, I've already tried to get simple answers to simple questions........................not going to happen.

!

Here's a simple question you won't answer. If Greer's arm crossing was innnocent then why did they edit that out of Zapruder with silly video fakery from 63?

 

[Liability]

Sorry bout that,


1. 1. or 2.
2.Thats all I ask.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

He's not going to answer that question. Trust me, I've already tried to get simple answers to simple questions........................not going to happen.

!

Here's a simple question you won't answer. If Greer's arm crossing was innnocent then why did they edit that out of Zapruder with silly video fakery from 63?

Why was it ended IN by fakery?

 

[Rationalist1016]

Sorry bout that,


1. 1. or 2.
2.Thats all I ask.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

He's not going to answer that question. Trust me, I've already tried to get simple answers to simple questions........................not going to happen.

!

Here's a simple question you won't answer. If Greer's arm crossing was innnocent then why did they edit that out of Zapruder with silly video fakery from 63?

I absolutely WILL address that.
Because there is NO PROOF that the Zapruder film has been faked. Can you find a study, done in a peer review manner, that shows the film is fake? Your claim is that "an event happened, yet it was edited out of the video evidence". So, how do YOU know about it? Oh yeah, the Nix film! The one filmed from farther away than Zapruder and from the left side of the car. Which shows what? Nothing! Once you zoom in far enough to see the driver, it is so pixelated you can't make out any real detail. And even in THAT film, the detail that you claim is the left arm, is out of timing with the head shot.

Now I addressed your question. Will you address mine?

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Yup, *The Hair* did it!
2. That damned hair will do it everytime!!!!
3. Thats what we call a *Bad Hair Day* here in Texas



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Liability]

Couldn't help but notice that 7forNever is ducking the obvious.

IF Greer (the driver) shot the President from IN FRONT of the PRESIDENT and to the President's LEFT, then WHY did the President's head and upper torso slam back and to the the President's left?

IF 7forNever ever finds the nadz to answer that one, then no matter what he says, he's stuck.

And he knows it too. But let's highlight the problem -- again.

If he says that a shot from in front and left can cause a head to slam back AND also to the left, then he is admitting that forces other than simple Newtonian physics might account for the physical reactions we observe.

IF he says that, then there's no reason those same "factors" (whatever they might be) could not account for the movement of the President's head when shot from BEHIND and to the right. (Book Depository).

If he says, "Uhm, ONLY Newtonian Physics can account for the movement of the President's head upon being struck by the bullet," then he is denying that the President was shot by Greer.

Which is it, 7forNever?

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,

Couldn't help but notice that 7forNever is ducking the obvious.

IF Greer (the driver) shot the President from IN FRONT of the PRESIDENT and to the President's LEFT, then WHY did the President's head and upper torso slam back and to the the President's left?

IF 7forNever ever finds the nadz to answer that one, then no matter what he says, he's stuck.

And he knows it too. But let's highlight the problem -- again.

If he says that a shot from in front and left can cause a head to slam back AND also to the left, then he is admitting that forces other than simple Newtonian physics might account for the physical reactions we observe.

IF he says that, then there's no reason those same "factors" (whatever they might be) could not account for the movement of the President's head when shot from BEHIND and to the right. (Book Depository).

If he says, "Uhm, ONLY Newtonian Physics can account for the movement of the President's head upon being struck by the bullet," then he is denying that the President was shot by Greer.

Which is it, 7forNever?

1. I shall answer this question, its easy to answer anyways.
2. There is basically, no way in HELL a person can while driving a Limo, and swing around and within a second, shoot at a man and hit him sitting basically three rows back over his right shoulder with his left hand, this is impossible, thats just to say the least, no way and no how, not in this life time ever could it EVER, be done, give it up!!!!!
3. Besides we all know the passenger did it with his hair!!!!!



Regards,
SirJamesofTexas

 

[Liability]

Wow. 7forNever is a total *****.

Too afraid to answer 'cause he knows that EITHER answer nails him as the douche bag fraud he is.

 

[7forever]

!

Here's a simple question you won't answer. If Greer's arm crossing was innnocent then why did they edit that out of Zapruder with silly video fakery from 63?

I absolutely WILL address that.
Because there is NO PROOF that the Zapruder film has been faked. Can you find a study, done in a peer review manner, that shows the film is fake? Your claim is that "an event happened, yet it was edited out of the video evidence". So, how do YOU know about it? Oh yeah, the Nix film! The one filmed from farther away than Zapruder and from the left side of the car. Which shows what? Nothing! Once you zoom in far enough to see the driver, it is so pixelated you can't make out any real detail. And even in THAT film, the detail that you claim is the left arm, is out of timing with the head shot.

Now I addressed your question. Will you address mine?

Because there is PROOF that Zapruder was faked. Can you find a study, done in a peer review manner, that shows the film is fake? I can't because it's brand new and every person who saw Greer pass the gun in Zapruder and looked at nix understand the simple fakery committed to Zapruder. Your claim is that a visual fact did not happen and Greer's left hand came off the wheel in frame 304 but there is no evidence the left hand returned to the wheel but there is visual proof it did cross his shoulder in both nix and muchmore.

So, you are assuming something you could never prove. Oh yeah, the Nix film! The one film that needed to be zoomed on to see if his left arm really did cross and it did along with muchmore. Once you zoom in far enough to see the driver, it is clear as day that his left arm crosses with the headshot and you can make out real detail. It's not out of timing. Over his right shoulder it shows the muzzle blast. The grey area pops at the same time as Greer's shot.

Increase your screen size to 200% and watch the area over Greer's right shoulder. It pops in unison with the headshot. It's most noticeable at normal speed.

This old copy shows the same recoil/jolt backward but with video fakery. You can also see the fake red mist appear before the full blotch forms.

 

[StashMan]

Audio recordings of Jackie Kennedy saying that she believed that LBJ was behind the assassination are about to be released to the public.

Explosive Jackie O tapes reveal how she believed Johnson killed JFK -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net

 

[Liability]

Couldn't help but notice that 7forNever is ducking the obvious.

IF Greer (the driver) shot the President from IN FRONT of the PRESIDENT and to the President's LEFT, then WHY did the President's head and upper torso slam back and to the the President's left?

IF 7forNever ever finds the nadz to answer that one, then no matter what he says, he's stuck.

And he knows it too. But let's highlight the problem -- again.

If he says that a shot from in front and left can cause a head to slam back AND also to the left, then he is admitting that forces other than simple Newtonian physics might account for the physical reactions we observe.

IF he says that, then there's no reason those same "factors" (whatever they might be) could not account for the movement of the President's head when shot from BEHIND and to the right. (Book Depository).

If he says, "Uhm, ONLY Newtonian Physics can account for the movement of the President's head upon being struck by the bullet," then he is denying that the President was shot by Greer.

Which is it, 7forNever?

BUMP! 7forNever will answer the logical question in
(a) one millenium
(b) one epoch
(c) on a distant world, far far away -- but probably not in our lifetime
(d) on the 7th day after for NEVER.

 

[Liability]

Audio recordings of Jackie Kennedy saying that she believed that LBJ was behind the assassination are about to be released to the public.

Explosive Jackie O tapes reveal how she believed Johnson killed JFK -- Puppet Masters -- Sott.net

Whatever the late widow of President Kennedy "believed" is of no importance whatsoever.

 

[Rationalist1016]

Here's a simple question you won't answer. If Greer's arm crossing was innnocent then why did they edit that out of Zapruder with silly video fakery from 63?

I absolutely WILL address that.
Because there is NO PROOF that the Zapruder film has been faked. Can you find a study, done in a peer review manner, that shows the film is fake? Your claim is that "an event happened, yet it was edited out of the video evidence". So, how do YOU know about it? Oh yeah, the Nix film! The one filmed from farther away than Zapruder and from the left side of the car. Which shows what? Nothing! Once you zoom in far enough to see the driver, it is so pixelated you can't make out any real detail. And even in THAT film, the detail that you claim is the left arm, is out of timing with the head shot.

Now I addressed your question. Will you address mine?

Because there is PROOF that Zapruder was faked. Can you find a study, done in a peer review manner, that shows the film is fake? I can't because it's brand new and every person who saw Greer pass the gun in Zapruder and looked at nix understand the simple fakery committed to Zapruder. Your claim is that a visual fact did not happen and Greer's left hand came off the wheel in frame 304 but there is no evidence the left hand returned to the wheel but there is visual proof it did cross his shoulder in both nix and muchmore.

So, you are assuming something you could never prove. Oh yeah, the Nix film! The one film that needed to be zoomed on to see if his left arm really did cross and it did along with muchmore. Once you zoom in far enough to see the driver, it is clear as day that his left arm crosses with the headshot and you can make out real detail. It's not out of timing. Over his right shoulder it shows the muzzle blast. The grey area pops at the same time as Greer's shot.

Increase your screen size to 200% and watch the area over Greer's right shoulder. It pops in unison with the headshot. It's most noticeable at normal speed.

This old copy shows the same recoil/jolt backward but with video fakery. You can also see the fake red mist appear before the full blotch forms.

What a shock..................you didn't address the question that I had asked.
Do you remember? The one about Connolly being in the line of fire. So, how about it?

I've also noticed you have not addressed Liability's question about the movement of Kennedy's head. Which is an EXCELLENT question by the way.

 

[7forever]

.

Now I addressed your question. Will you address mine?

Increase your screen size to 200% and watch the area over Greer's right shoulder. It pops in unison with the headshot. It's most noticeable at normal speed.

This old copy shows the same recoil/jolt backward but with video fakery. You can also see the fake red mist appear before the full blotch forms.
jpg[/IMG]

What a shock..................you didn't address the question that I had asked.
Do you remember? The one about Connolly being in the line of fire. So, how about it?

I've also noticed you have not addressed Liability's question about the movement of Kennedy's head. Which is an EXCELLENT question by the way.

If you wanna continue your delusions that Connally was in the way, that's your business. You said the timing was off meaning that you do see his arm cross, so it is clear. I showed the muzzle blast is in perfect sync with the fake reflection. It's all going forward.