The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[LA RAM FAN]

You and your bullshit posts haven't been banned yet?

You and your bullshit posts should be be banned. You are retarded and useless.

You are a dodging little ***** and I will gladly smack your ass around. The WC is bunk. Can't be proven and was debunked. My work proves Greer's guilt and debunks the right side entrance and exit. You cannot prove your case nor challenge the facts against Greer. It has nothing to do with anyone except you being a *****.

exactly.

 

[Rationalist1016]

Hundreds of researchers DO NOT claim that the driver killed JFK.
YOUR opinion on this case is debunked by your own posting of the Z film. Clearly shows .

You are a dodging little ***** and I will gladly smack your ass around. The WC is bunk. Can't be proven and was debunked. My work proves Greer's guilt and debunks the right side entrance and exit. You cannot prove your case nor challenge the facts against Greer. It has nothing to do with anyone except you being a *****.

What am I dodging? This is your last post........"Your opinions on this case were debunked by hundreds of researchers and a movie. Jfk was shot in the right front by Greer with the exit exactly where witnesses and frame 313 place it. No evidence to the contrary can be brought against these facts."

I addressed that. I also asked you to name a researcher, other than William Cooper, that claims the Greer fired a weapon. And as usual, you did not respond to that. Also, you didn't respond to my question about the Z film. Are you going to address those, or are you DODGING the question?

You want evidence that is contrary to "your" facts? The clip you show of Greer shows it pretty well that he didn't fire a weapon. Nobody inside the car or outside the car claims to have seen or heard him do this. There were no bullet fragments found in Kennedy (or anywhere else for that matter) that didn't match the 6.5mm ammunition.
Besides that, your challenge for evidence against your claim has one major fallacy................you can't prove a negative. It would be the same as asking for evidence to prove that Mrs. Connally didn't turn and shoot Kennedy. Just as what I said about Greer applies to Mrs. Connally. There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claim.

You can huff & puff all you want. Call those that don't agree with you all the names you want, it doesn't make your case. Just shows that you don't have anything. The more we go through this, the more I am convinced that you are mainly on this thread to get attention...........nothing more.

 

[Liability]

You and your bullshit posts should be be banned. You are retarded and useless.

You are a dodging little ***** and I will gladly smack your ass around. The WC is bunk. Can't be proven and was debunked. My work proves Greer's guilt and debunks the right side entrance and exit. You cannot prove your case nor challenge the facts against Greer. It has nothing to do with anyone except you being a *****.

exactly.

"Your work."

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

9/11 Rimjob's "work" is sticking his tongue up the ass of his fellow idiot whacked out delusional scumbag conspiracy douche bag buddies. His work proves that his breath is as shitty smelling as his mind is twisted.

 

[7forever]

You are a dodging little ***** and I will gladly smack your ass around. The WC is bunk. Can't be proven and was debunked. My work proves Greer's guilt and debunks the right side entrance and exit. You cannot prove your case nor challenge the facts against Greer. It has nothing to do with anyone except you being a *****.

What am I dodging? This is your last post........"Your opinions on this case were debunked by hundreds of researchers and a movie. Jfk was shot in the right front by Greer with the exit exactly where witnesses and frame 313 place it. No evidence to the contrary can be brought against these facts."

I addressed that. I also asked you to name a researcher, other than William Cooper, that claims the Greer fired a weapon. And as usual, you did not respond to that. Also, you didn't respond to my question about the Z film. Are you going to address those, or are you DODGING the question?

.

You addressed nothing. 40 witnesses and frames 312-313 show the exit on the right rear. Plus frame 337. You have nothing as usual. I would never read your blabbering nonsense. You're wasting your time writing it.

 

[7forever]

You are a dodging little ***** and I will gladly smack your ass around. The WC is bunk. Can't be proven and was debunked. My work proves Greer's guilt and debunks the right side entrance and exit. You cannot prove your case nor challenge the facts against Greer. It has nothing to do with anyone except you being a *****.

Besides that, your challenge for evidence against your claim has one major fallacy................you can't prove a negative. It would be the same as asking for evidence to prove that Mrs. Connally didn't turn and shoot Kennedy. Just as what I said about Greer applies to Mrs. Connally. There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claim.

.

You cannot disprove or challenge a positive which is all of Greer's movements prove he shot jfk. He passes the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in both other films. You can't prove the negative that Oswald fired a rear headshot.LOL You are fucked up and horrible at disinfo.

 

[Rationalist1016]

What am I dodging? This is your last post........"Your opinions on this case were debunked by hundreds of researchers and a movie. Jfk was shot in the right front by Greer with the exit exactly where witnesses and frame 313 place it. No evidence to the contrary can be brought against these facts."

I addressed that. I also asked you to name a researcher, other than William Cooper, that claims the Greer fired a weapon. And as usual, you did not respond to that. Also, you didn't respond to my question about the Z film. Are you going to address those, or are you DODGING the question?

.

You addressed nothing. 40 witnesses and frames 312-313 show the exit on the right rear. Plus frame 337. You have nothing as usual. I would never read your blabbering nonsense. You're wasting your time writing it.

That speaks volumes about you.

 

[7forever]

You addressed nothing. 40 witnesses and frames 312-313 show the exit on the right rear. Plus frame 337. You have nothing as usual. I would never read your blabbering nonsense. You're wasting your time writing it.

That speaks volumes about you.

You ignoring facts and failing to provide any evidence of your lies proves you are a little ***** who feels the need to post dung against visual facts.

 

[7forever]

You addressed nothing. 40 witnesses and frames 312-313 show the exit on the right rear. Plus frame 337. You have nothing as usual. I would never read your blabbering nonsense. You're wasting your time writing it.

That speaks volumes about you.

If you or any kook started a thread about Oswald, I would never post in it because it's bullshit. But you on the other hand are addicted to denying the facts that prove Greer's guilt. You suck at it though.

 

[Rationalist1016]

Besides that, your challenge for evidence against your claim has one major fallacy................you can't prove a negative. It would be the same as asking for evidence to prove that Mrs. Connally didn't turn and shoot Kennedy. Just as what I said about Greer applies to Mrs. Connally. There is NO EVIDENCE to support that claim.

.

You cannot disprove or challenge a positive which is all of Greer's movements prove he shot jfk. He passes the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in both other films. You can't prove the negative that Oswald fired a rear headshot.LOL You are fucked up and horrible at disinfo.

For once, you claimed something that is correct............it cannot be proved that Oswald pulled the trigger.............I would agree. But, it has been proved that the gun that was found, was his. And had his & only his finger prints on it. The bullet fragments found in Kennedy where 6.5mm "only", that matched the ammunition in the gun. Three shells where found............three shots where heard. Looks like a pretty good case again Oswald.
Now, I have stated this before, but sense you don't read all of the posts, I will state it again. I think it is very possible that Oswald did not do it alone.

 

[Rationalist1016]

That speaks volumes about you.

If you or any kook started a thread about Oswald, I would never post in it because it's bullshit. But you on the other hand are addicted to denying the facts that prove Greer's guilt. You suck at it though.

FACTS? What facts? All you have are claims. Your opinions don't mean anything.
I know you seem to think you have done a lot of "work" on the subject, sense you claim that all the time. But you haven't so much as found a creditable researcher that agrees with you.

 

[Rationalist1016]

Somehow the quotes on the last few posts have gotten turned around. So the quotes of "7forever" look like they came from me. Don't know if this was done by accident or on purpose, but I do want it clear as to who said what. I sure don't want to be associated with saying most of the stuff that "7forever" has said.

 

[7forever]

If you or any kook started a thread about Oswald, I would never post in it because it's bullshit. But you on the other hand are addicted to denying the facts that prove Greer's guilt. You suck at it though.

FACTS? What facts? All you have are claims. Your opinions don't mean anything.
I know you seem to think you have done a lot of "work" on the subject, sense you claim that all the time. But you haven't so much as found a creditable researcher that agrees with you.

It's a fact that Zapruder was altered, something you must ignore. His arm crosses in both other films, proving that the illusion in Zapruder is a reality. I don't need anyone on silly message boards to agree with visual facts. I just keep posting those facts with them being ignored. Hundreds of researchers agreed the grassy knoll was possible but it's not. Hundreds of researchers have known for decades that Greer shot jfk but ignored and covered it up. It has finally been proven and they will never challenge it...ever.

 

[7forever]

You cannot disprove or challenge a positive which is all of Greer's movements prove he shot jfk. He passes the gun in Z and his left arm crosses in both other films. You can't prove the negative that Oswald fired a rear headshot.LOL You are fucked up and horrible at disinfo.

For once, you claimed something that is correct............it cannot be proved that Oswald pulled the trigger.............I would agree. .

He didn't fire the fatal shot because Greer did and even without that truth the fatal shot did not come from the rear. It looks like he was hit in the right side of head but it was in the right front. It doesn't matter whether Oswald was involved or not. The secret service fired the kill shot.

 

[Liability]

Greer did not shoot anybody with the glint of the hair of the front seat passenger.

I doubt that glint was even loaded.

 

[7forever]

He used his left arm and hand to shoot jfk.

 

[Liability]

He used his left arm and hand to shoot jfk.

Absolutely insane that anybody would even THINK something that facially ridiculous, much less couch it as an "argument" with no possibility of factual support.

7forNever is a complete lying douche bag.

 

[7forever]

He used his left arm and hand to shoot jfk.

Absolutely insane that anybody would even THINK something that facially ridiculous, much less couch it as an "argument" with no possibility of factual support.

7forNever is a complete lying douche bag.

Absolutely insane that anybody would ever deny that Greer shot jfk after seeing his left arm cross in both other films.

Liar with no ability is a complete lying douche bag.

 

[Liability]

He used his left arm and hand to shoot jfk.

Absolutely insane that anybody would even THINK something that facially ridiculous, much less couch it as an "argument" with no possibility of factual support.

7forNever is a complete lying douche bag.

Absolutely insane that anybody would ever deny that Greer shot jfk after seeing his left arm cross in both other films.

Liar with no ability is a complete lying douche bag.

There is not a single shred of evidence for your imbecilic contention.

This is why you are a laughingstock, dick breath.

Oh, and for the folks laughing at you for your insane delusional grunting claims, here's a very nice, concise refutation of your idiocy:

JFK Lancer

 

[7forever]

Absolutely insane that anybody would even THINK something that facially ridiculous, much less couch it as an "argument" with no possibility of factual support.

7forNever is a complete lying douche bag.

Absolutely insane that anybody would ever deny that Greer shot jfk after seeing his left arm cross in both other films.

Liar with no ability is a complete lying douche bag.

[/url]

You are the definition of insane. Repeating the same proven lies over and over and expecting something different. His arm crosses and there's not a damn thing you can do to change that fact.

 

[7forever]

Absolutely insane that anybody would even THINK something that facially ridiculous, much less couch it as an "argument" with no possibility of factual support.

7forNever is a complete lying douche bag.

Absolutely insane that anybody would ever deny that Greer shot jfk after seeing his left arm cross in both other films.

Liar with no ability is a complete lying douche bag.

There is not a single shred of evidence for your imbecilic contention.

This is why you are a laughingstock, dick breath.

Oh, and for the folks laughing at you for your insane delusional grunting claims, here's a very nice, concise refutation of your idiocy:

JFK Lancer

There is not a single shred of evidence for your imbecilic contention that Oswald shot jfk or whatever bullshit you believe and can't prove.

This is why you are a laughingstock, dick breath.

Oh, and for the folks laughing at you for your insane delusional grunting denials, here's a very nice, concise refutation of your idiocy. Greer's left arm crosses with the headshot, solving this case.