The Israeli Criminals Behind the NSA Spy Scandal

[SAYIT]

?? not even a guess ?? over 200 ? over 500 ? thousands ?

“CONTROLLED DEMOLITION” “Oh there's plenty of evidence. You just refuse to acknowledge it.”

- When did all this rigging take place…weeks/months/days before IT happened, in the middle of the night ?


- (the riggers ~~~~> were they: the ‘higher ups’ you speak of or “others” ???). Also, what are these like Spiderman and Batman type explosives’ people ? what a ******* job………..THE LOGISTICS OF THE THING….

- rigging these very big buildings is time consuming. Do you have a time frame for this "controlled demolition" rigging jobs ?? how long it would take ? I can’t believe they went completely undetected for as long as it took “them” to rig the buildings….!!


you couldn't explain even just a little about.........the planting of the explosives ("controlled demolition" that your 100% convinced HAPPENED...).

Basically what you are suggesting is that since you are unable to conceive of the possible ways in which these demolitions were possible, that they therefore were impossible.

I can easily make reasonable conjectures on how all of these things were possible that are at least as plausible as all of the pitiful excuses that you guys come up with attempting to explain away a thousand "coincidences" at once.

To begin with one might consider the odds that two planes could cause the complete destruction of three steel framed buildings to all collapse in the fashion of controlled demolitions on the same day.
Then one would have to multiply those chances by the odds that all the Put Options were coincidental, that the US Air Defenses would fail in such a spectacular way, that numerous intelligence officers have all ready made public statements to the effect that knowledge of planned attacks was known in advance of the attacks, that PNAC preceded these events, that the entire investigation was stonewalled , policed and conducted by Zionist Jews, that key witnesses were smeared, murdered and jailed, and all of these events and many more all just happened to coalesce and coincide precisely at the time of the attacks.

And this is just a cursory list of the number of items which would have to be included in order to do a probability analysis of those events.

When they are taken all together, the mathematical probability that all of these events was due to chance grow vanishingly small.

There was less circumstantial evidence in the OJ trial than there is here. And how many people really believe that OJ was innocent who do not realize that his acquittal was political?

No, no. The Media put the clamps down on this story, and were complicit in the cover up and the character assassination that was preformed against witnesses. Those orders had to come down from high on the Totem Pole.

Just so I understand your theory: are you claiming that 9/11 was the work of our gov't (including the military and courts), our media and, of course, the Jews?
No angry Muslims shouting "Allah Akbar?"

 

[holston]

Just so I understand your theory: are you claiming that 9/11 was the work of our gov't (including the military and courts), our media and, of course, the Jews?
No angry Muslims shouting "Allah Akbar?"

No.
I'm saying that there were those in the US and Israel who knew about the plans for the attack in advance and probably helped facilitate the attacks.
It wasn't Arabs who planted thermite and cutter charges in the buildings.

It's certain that there was more at work than the few accused hijackers.

It's also possible that they could have been enlisted and set up by US and or Israeli Zionists either in or out of the government of either nation.
It's also possible that elements of organized crime were directly involved and probable that they were involved in the later stages.

What is certain is that the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't tell the true story.

 

[SAYIT]

Just so I understand your theory: are you claiming that 9/11 was the work of our gov't (including the military and courts), our media and, of course, the Jews?
No angry Muslims shouting "Allah Akbar?"

No.
I'm saying that there were those in the US and Israel who knew about the plans for the attack in advance and probably helped facilitate the attacks.
It wasn't Arabs who planted thermite and cutter charges in the buildings.

It's certain that there was more at work than the few accused hijackers.

It's also possible that they could have been enlisted and set up by US and or Israeli Zionists either in or out of the government of either nation.
It's also possible that elements of organized crime were directly involved and probable that they were involved in the later stages.

What is certain is that the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't tell the true story.

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Just so I understand your theory: are you claiming that 9/11 was the work of our gov't (including the military and courts), our media and, of course, the Jews?
No angry Muslims shouting "Allah Akbar?"

No.
I'm saying that there were those in the US and Israel who knew about the plans for the attack in advance and probably helped facilitate the attacks.
It wasn't Arabs who planted thermite and cutter charges in the buildings.

It's certain that there was more at work than the few accused hijackers.

It's also possible that they could have been enlisted and set up by US and or Israeli Zionists either in or out of the government of either nation.
It's also possible that elements of organized crime were directly involved and probable that they were involved in the later stages.

What is certain is that the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't tell the true story.

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

That's what the world would like to know...Of course there is zero physical evidence that they ever existed, and nothing to prove they did other than opinion ans conspiracy theories...

 

[eots]

No.
I'm saying that there were those in the US and Israel who knew about the plans for the attack in advance and probably helped facilitate the attacks.
It wasn't Arabs who planted thermite and cutter charges in the buildings.

It's certain that there was more at work than the few accused hijackers.

It's also possible that they could have been enlisted and set up by US and or Israeli Zionists either in or out of the government of either nation.
It's also possible that elements of organized crime were directly involved and probable that they were involved in the later stages.

What is certain is that the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't tell the true story.

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

That's what the world would like to know...Of course there is zero physical evidence that they ever existed, and nothing to prove they did other than opinion ans conspiracy theories...

still waiting for the list of physical evidence used to support the NIST theory ollie...and btw..detonation charges would leave no visible trace..what is it you would expect to find without forensic testing ?

 

[SAYIT]

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

That's what the world would like to know...Of course there is zero physical evidence that they ever existed, and nothing to prove they did other than opinion ans conspiracy theories...

still waiting for the list of physical evidence used to support the NIST theory ollie...and btw..detonation charges would leave no visible trace..what is it you would expect to find without forensic testing ?

This conversation, much as you would like to derail it, is about Holston's claim of "thermite and cutter charges" which, as you well know, is bogus. The charges to which he refered do not even exist, as you also well know. Nearly 13 years later no evidence of a controlled demo have surfaced ... none. Maybe it's time you give that one up and try another loony CT. Sandy Hook, perhaps?

 

[SFC Ollie]

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

the collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;
the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST or by the New York City Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department, or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

 

[HistoryBefore67]

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Just so I understand your theory: are you claiming that 9/11 was the work of our gov't (including the military and courts), our media and, of course, the Jews?
No angry Muslims shouting "Allah Akbar?"

No.
I'm saying that there were those in the US and Israel who knew about the plans for the attack in advance and probably helped facilitate the attacks.
It wasn't Arabs who planted thermite and cutter charges in the buildings.

It's certain that there was more at work than the few accused hijackers.

It's also possible that they could have been enlisted and set up by US and or Israeli Zionists either in or out of the government of either nation.
It's also possible that elements of organized crime were directly involved and probable that they were involved in the later stages.

What is certain is that the 9/11 Commission Report doesn't tell the true story.

Holston dont waste your time on sayit.He is a sock puppet troll by some other poster sent here to troll the boards to derail any kind of truth discussion socking under this sock puppet user name.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

That's what the world would like to know...Of course there is zero physical evidence that they ever existed, and nothing to prove they did other than opinion ans conspiracy theories...

still waiting for the list of physical evidence used to support the NIST theory ollie...and btw..detonation charges would leave no visible trace..what is it you would expect to find without forensic testing ?

you will be waiting for YEARS then since gomer ollie has never been able to produce it in all these years here. and dont forget,Gomer ignores what high tranking officers with much higher ranking than he has,what they say saying THEY are wrong along with demolitions experts and he is right . He earns those big pay check from his handlers for his constant ass beatings he gets here when he trolls here everyday.

 

[eots]

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

the collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;
the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST or by the New York City Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department, or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

so the only so called evidence to support the NIST theory is a computer simulation they created...intresting

 

[eots]

That's what the world would like to know...Of course there is zero physical evidence that they ever existed, and nothing to prove they did other than opinion ans conspiracy theories...

still waiting for the list of physical evidence used to support the NIST theory ollie...and btw..detonation charges would leave no visible trace..what is it you would expect to find without forensic testing ?

This conversation, much as you would like to derail it, is about Holston's claim of "thermite and cutter charges" which, as you well know, is bogus. The charges to which he refered do not even exist, as you also well know. Nearly 13 years later no evidence of a controlled demo have surfaced ... none. Maybe it's time you give that one up and try another loony CT. Sandy Hook, perhaps?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOM_U5UM6Q]THERMITE CUTTING STEEL - VALIDATED - EXPERIMENTALLY DEMONSTRATED - YouTube[/ame]

 

[HistoryBefore67]

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

the collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;
the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST or by the New York City Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department, or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

so the only so called evidence to support the NIST theory is a computer simulation they created...intresting

thats classic Gomer for ya.

Gomer I have no doubt,also believes in the MAGIC BULLET THEORY of the warren commission beliving their version to be correct because of the COMPUTER STIMULATION they show on the CIAS controlled medias broadcast of Beyond Conspiracy that they always use to back up their version of events as the truth.

thats gomer for ya,worhips COMPUTER STIMULATIONS by the government as the gospel truth ignoring what witnesses say as well as experts in their fields.comedy gold classic from Gomer as always.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

another troll.great classic rebuttal to the truth and facts,the truth hurts and since you know you are cornered,evade the facts and shoot the messenger with ad nausem cartoons.congrats.

Well at least you evade facts and acknoweledge your defeat when you are cornered unlike Gomer Ollie does who gets desperate when HE is cornered and starts using computer stimulations for his arguments. you at least have thrown in the towel with childish cartoons admitting you have no argument instead of resorting to proven lies like Gomer does.

 

[HistoryBefore67]

Your tin foil hat is on too tight, dude.

 

[SFC Ollie]

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.

NIST’s findings also do not support the “controlled demolition” theory since there is conclusive evidence that:

the collapse was initiated in the impact and fire floors of the WTC towers and nowhere else, and;
the time it took for the collapse to initiate (56 minutes for WTC 2 and 102 minutes for WTC 1) was dictated by (1) the extent of damage caused by the aircraft impact, and (2) the time it took for the fires to reach critical locations and weaken the structure to the point that the towers could not resist the tremendous energy released by the downward movement of the massive top section of the building at and above the fire and impact floors.

Video evidence also showed unambiguously that the collapse progressed from the top to the bottom, and there was no evidence (collected by NIST or by the New York City Police Department, the Port Authority Police Department, or the Fire Department of New York) of any blast or explosions in the region below the impact and fire floors as the top building sections (including and above the 98th floor in WTC 1 and the 82nd floor in WTC 2) began their downward movement upon collapse initiation.

In summary, NIST found no corroborating evidence for alternative hypotheses suggesting that the WTC towers were brought down by controlled demolition using explosives. NIST also did not find any evidence that missiles were fired at or hit the towers. Instead, photographs and videos from several angles clearly show that the collapse initiated at the fire and impact floors and that the collapse progressed from the initiating floors downward until the dust clouds obscured the view.

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

so the only so called evidence to support the NIST theory is a computer simulation they created...intresting

No EOTS..And you know it you just dismiss any real evidence because it doesn't fit into your wanna be theories. You have zero physical evidence. You have zero credible investigations...

Nist has:

Both photographic and video evidence—as well as accounts from the New York City Police Department aviation unit during a half-hour period prior to collapse—support this sequence for each tower.

NIST conducted an extremely thorough three-year investigation that included consideration of a number of hypotheses for the collapses of the WTC towers.

Some 200 technical experts—including about 85 career NIST experts and 125 leading experts from the private sector and academia—reviewed tens of thousands of documents, interviewed more than 1,000 people, reviewed 7,000 segments of video footage and 7,000 photographs, analyzed 236 pieces of steel from the wreckage, performed laboratory tests, and created sophisticated computer simulations of the sequence of events that occurred from the moment the aircraft struck the towers until they began to collapse.


I think that trumps your Opinions from so called experts with an agenda, that you want to believe....

 

[SFC Ollie]

still waiting for the list of physical evidence used to support the NIST theory ollie...and btw..detonation charges would leave no visible trace..what is it you would expect to find without forensic testing ?

This conversation, much as you would like to derail it, is about Holston's claim of "thermite and cutter charges" which, as you well know, is bogus. The charges to which he refered do not even exist, as you also well know. Nearly 13 years later no evidence of a controlled demo have surfaced ... none. Maybe it's time you give that one up and try another loony CT. Sandy Hook, perhaps?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LNOM_U5UM6Q]THERMITE CUTTING STEEL - VALIDATED - EXPERIMENTALLY DEMONSTRATED - YouTube[/ame]

And these were placed in several hundred (if not thousands) of places and timed to go off perfectly starting with the floors that were damaged by the plane crashes, and the charges were placed all in one weekend and no one saw them and none of them were set off by the blast and and and...........

 

[SFC Ollie]

FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation

so the only so called evidence to support the NIST theory is a computer simulation they created...intresting

thats classic Gomer for ya.

Gomer I have no doubt,also believes in the MAGIC BULLET THEORY of the warren commission beliving their version to be correct because of the COMPUTER STIMULATION they show on the CIAS controlled medias broadcast of Beyond Conspiracy that they always use to back up their version of events as the truth.

thats gomer for ya,worhips COMPUTER STIMULATIONS by the government as the gospel truth ignoring what witnesses say as well as experts in their fields.comedy gold classic from Gomer as always.

According to your lying ass you will never know what i believe about anything.......Carry on....

 

[holston]

You mean those Muslims who attacked America on 9/11 were working for the Jews?
BTW, what thermite and cutter charges?

Not at all.

There's more than one scenario that is possible given what the public has to go on.

The details of a crime are usually not determined until after it has been decided that a crime has been committed.
In the case of 9/11 a crime was clearly committed.

What has not been proven is who was behind it. The proof that 19 Arabs with boxcutters did it has never been forthcoming. In fact some of those who were on the original accused list were proven NOT to be.
A trial was never conducted and a verdict never rendered except the verdict which was passed down by the Bush administration and the Jewish media.


There is no doubt in my mind that there are many Muslims who would like to kill Israelis and even US citizens. It could be argued with good reason. The unconditional support of the US for Israel is reason enough for even those who are not extreme to want to get the attention of the US public.

Since the internet has came into existence the public is now able to see the other side of that story, the side which the US media has never presented.

As I pointed out earlier, why would Arabs, who were intelligent to circumvent the combined intelligence of US and Israel want to go through with such plan if they knew in advance that the probable outcome would make matters worse for the Islamic world than ever?

And what would Arabs be doing involving themselves in matters that involved Iraq and Afghanistan?


But for the sake of exploration, let's assume that there were Arabs who were clever enough and had the resources required to pull this off.

First of all, where did they get the financing and all the necessary intelligence information that would be needed to make it successful?

The media said, Bin Laden, right off the bat, even before the FBI or CIA had a chance to comment. And this was fed to the public by Jewish and Israeli spokesmen.
Aside from that, there were many things about Bin Laden which made his candidacy questionable, from the time the CIA set him up to fight the USSR to the failure of the assassination squad to produce a body.

I digress.

Given so many "Arabs" who would gladly take out a few Americans as revenge for supporting Israel, it would not be hard to find a few of them who would volunteer for the job, for anyone who had the resources and knew where to look.

Let's neglect for the moment the fact that the former CIA handle Susan Lindauer has already said that it is known that the hijackers were CIA assets.

Let us ask ourselves whether such a plan could be hatched by members of the Mossad or the CIA or the NSA as easily if not more so, than Bin Laden or someone like him. No one else was ever suggested. Given that PNAC was a known FACT (They've changed it's name since.) it seems MORE THAN likely that the idea occurred to some of them.

So why not use them in order to get what they wanted, which was to bring the brunt of the US military against Israel's enemies in the mid-east. And they could use Big Oil and the Bush family to take the blame while the Arabs would be the Patsies.
There is PLENTY of evidence that points in this direction. You simply DENY it. You know you can so long as no one in authority has the power to drag these people into court!
It would be a cinch to FACILITATE the plan, if not set the whole damned thing up. My guess is that some militant Muslims hatched the idea but that the plan was co-opted. It's success was guaranteed by people who were in positions to ALLOW it to happen. That is, they were in control of the "switching terminals" where certain channels could be opened or closed as needed. All those people would need in addition is aid of those who could give the necessary orders to be able to shut down any further inquiry. All that takes is big bucks.
Anyone who has participated in a scheme that resulted in the deaths of thousands would have ample reason to keep their mouths shut indefinitely.

Meanwhile back at the ranch, some Zionists who were sitting on the real estate in question were informed of what was in the works and took measures to capitalize on it. Whether they used organized crime or the Mossad to carry out the technical part or perhaps a little of both got in on the action is hard to say.

The connection to Bin Laden was never established. The US went to war in Afghanistan on the assumptions of the Bush administration. Those assumptions were never proven.
Similarly, the US public was fed information about WMDs in Iraq also which later proved to be unwarranted and probably exaggerated if not contrived. Never mind the fact that any chemical weapons that Hussein had were given to him BY THE US in order to fight against Iran.

Even the above "official" narrative of the reasons for the wars which have been waged for the past decade are based on nothing but speculation.

Where is YOUR proof for any of it?

You have none. Any "evidence" that you can muster is no less circumstantial than that which indicates controlled demolitions. And much of that could be called "hearsay".

So how can you insist that YOUR story, ie the one made up by the 9/11 Commission is the true one?


Where is YOUR description of all the DETAILS of how 9/11 was carried out?

We need you to tell us how ALL of this went down, from the conception of the plan to Bin Laden's denial of involvement.
While you are at it, you can tell us what happened to all the WMDs that were amassed in Iraq and where they are hiding now.

Tell us how news reporters were able to get interviews with Bin Laden when the CIA and all the King's men couldn't track hide nor hair of him.


Since you have the PROOF for the veracity of the 9/11 Commission Report, these other little items shouldn't be any problem for you to reveal to the rest of us.

Somehow, YOU , have gained access to all this inside information and, only YOU, and the "debunkers" are endowed with the intelligence to interpret it.

Given YOUR superior knowledge and connections, it baffles me how YOU and YOUR ILK can be so CONTEMPTUOUS of anyone who has doubts and openly expresses them.

YOU and YOUR KIND seem to prefer that the rest of us "morons" and "Nuts' should just keep our mouths such and quietly and obediently ACCEPT what YOU have to say about everything, ESPECIALLY when it comes to the unquestionable virtues of Israel and ALL Judaism.

Why is this?


Getting back to the original question; Is it possible that members of the Zionist elite could have decided that the open hostility of the Muslims against Israel and the US for the outdoor concentration camp imposed on them in Palestine could be used against them?

I believe that is possible.

Not only do I believe that, I think that something along those lines likely occurred.

Radical and militant Muslims could indeed have conjured up the idea of suicide attacks via hijacked air-lines.

That idea is IN FACT DECADES OLD> Which accentuates the LIE that Bush JR told when he said that "No one in his administration could have conceived of it."

Therefore we KNOW FOR A FACT that AT A BARE MINIMUM, some elements of US and Israeli intelligence had PRIOR knowledge of an impending attack.


Having this knowledge and failing to act upon it made all those who did COMPLICIT in the attack. In popular terms it is called a SIN OF OMISSION> such as the case when one is convicted of FAILING TO REPORT a known case of Child Abuse.

From this alone it is easy to see why it would be IMPERATIVE for all those who had this knowledge to avoid the PROOF of it becoming KNOWN to the public.

Not only would they need this to avoid being convicted of a crime, they would forever be remembered as complicit in the murder of thousands of American citizens as well as gross dereliction of duty, but also TREASON, not to mention all the PERJURY they have been guilty of and OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE.


So even a MORON like YOURSELF and the de(full of) BUNK crowd ought to be able to SEE THIS MUCH.

Unless you are STUPID to the nth degree, and I don't think you are, that makes you fit the the description of HASBARA or a government DISINFORMATION agent. For all practical purposes you may as well be.

ALL your posts fit the profile perfectly. Your unswerving unquestioning support of ISRAEL and US Zionism fits the Zionist agenda right down the line, from your total glorification of Judiasm vs the total vilification of every Palestinian to your defense of the Zionist led 9/11 Commission .

I bet you're a defender of the Federal Reserve and think that subprime mortgage bundling is the best thing since hot cakes too.
Whoops I shouldn't have said that. Now you'll DENY IT.
Just like Jews DENY that they USE Blacks against the WASP establishment and that they have worked to "secure" OPEN BOARDERS for the US.

There's a list of such issues that one can use as indicators of who the Zionist socks are on these forums that one can use to identify them based on which side of the issue they come down on.
The only deviations from these positions are those taken which seem contrary in order to make it appear that the JEWISH ZIONIST POLITICAL FACTION are not unified under one common theme; "Is it good for the Jews."

A prime example of this would be Michael Weiner alias "Dr Savage" with his "Boarders, Language, and Culture" theme. The guy is an admitted ZIONIST and yet he would have all us Putzes believe that he gives a damn about the Western European , anything, so long as it isn't needed to sustain the Zionist PARASITE that is SUCKING the LIFE out the USA.

I love you too, Sock