Yes. I really do want to "compare Japanese unions to ours". The fact that you have to point to a higher union participation shows you're a disingenuous hack who just got his ass handed to him with facts. What they flying leap difference does bit make that they have 18% participation rate?!? Who argued that? Nobody.
Well, except that unions have a halo effect. We had our greatest prosperity in terms of wages when we had 33% union membership. Why? Because even if you aren't in a union, unions do keep wages high for non-union members. They have to offer decent wages in order to compete for talent.
So of course, when a country like Japan has an 18% union membership rate, it benefits everyone.
The fact remains that in Japan, it is intolerable and unheard of for a subordinate to leave before their manager.
Right, you made this claim, but it really doesn't mean much of anything. Why would a manager need to be around? Point is, you really don't want people to stick around past the 40 hours, because then you got to pay them overtime. Dumbass.
Joey...you don't explain anything. You lie. There is a big difference. Like the way you lie about the percentage of people in Japanese unions when that wasn't even the discussion. It had nothing to do with the issue at hand. And you know it. You're a disingenuous hack.
Well, yeah, it did. YOu were just too stupid to understand the concept.
Workers with rights are productive workers. they are happy workers. They are motivated.
You think you can pay someone minimum wage, and they'll be motivated and won't totally vote for more socialism after they have to go to the government for food stamps and section 8.
and when they do EXACTLY THAT, just like I warned you they would, you whine.
"BUT THE FOUNDING SLAVE RAPISTS DIDN'T SAY NOTHING ABOUT NO FOOD STAMPS!!!!"
Schmuck.