I
Indofred
Guest
I STAND WITH ISRAEL!
So do I, with my boot right on its balls.
Last edited by a moderator:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I STAND WITH ISRAEL!
Billo_Really, Slyhunter, et al,
This is not exactly true.
(COMMENT)Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.not.
Palestinians throwing rocks at tanks are not innocent.
It is covered in Article 68 of the Geneva Convention IV. It is not legal, any more than throwing rocks at police or military is legal in the US. Throwing rock is NOT legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:ARTICLE 68:
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed.
SOURCE: Section III. Occupied territories
Most Respectfully,
R
Billo_Really, Slyhunter, et al,
This is not exactly true.
(COMMENT)Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
It is covered in Article 68 of the Geneva Convention IV. It is not legal, any more than throwing rocks at police or military is legal in the US. Throwing rock is NOT legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:ARTICLE 68:
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed.
SOURCE: Section III. Occupied territories
Most Respectfully,
R
You are cherry picking the occupation laws. Why don't you give us the rest of the story?
I STAND WITH ISRAEL!
So do I, with my boot right on it's balls.
(COMMENT)Billo_Really, Slyhunter, et al,
This is not exactly true.
(COMMENT)Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
It is covered in Article 68 of the Geneva Convention IV. It is not legal, any more than throwing rocks at police or military is legal in the US. Throwing rock is NOT legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:ARTICLE 68:
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed.
SOURCE: Section III. Occupied territories
Most Respectfully,
R
You are cherry picking the occupation laws. Why don't you give us the rest of the story?
There's no story, of course.You are cherry picking the occupation laws. Why don't you give us the rest of the story?
Tinmore, when someone is ticketed for speeding the cop doesn't quote any driving offenses except for speeding. You are being facetious,Billo_Really, Slyhunter, et al,
This is not exactly true.
(COMMENT)Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
It is covered in Article 68 of the Geneva Convention IV. It is not legal, any more than throwing rocks at police or military is legal in the US. Throwing rock is NOT legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:ARTICLE 68:
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed.
SOURCE: Section III. Occupied territories
Most Respectfully,
R
You are cherry picking the occupation laws. Why don't you give us the rest of the story?
Maybe you should stop murdering innocent Palestinian's?Maybe we should use Israel soldiers as bait. Stick them out there and when the rats flock to kill them we take them out. Makes it easier to know who to kill.
Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.not.
Palestinians throwing rocks at tanks are not innocent.
I STAND WITH ISRAEL!
So do I, with my boot right on it's balls.
Billo_Really, Slyhunter, et al,
This is not exactly true.
(COMMENT)Throwing rocks at tanks is not a capitol crime, it's legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
It is covered in Article 68 of the Geneva Convention IV. It is not legal, any more than throwing rocks at police or military is legal in the US. Throwing rock is NOT legal resistance to a belligerent occupation.
Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. Geneva said:ARTICLE 68:
Protected persons who commit an offence which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power, but which does not constitute an attempt on the life or limb of members of the occupying forces or administration, nor a grave collective danger, nor seriously damage the property of the occupying forces or administration or the installations used by them, shall be liable to internment or simple imprisonment, provided the duration of such internment or imprisonment is proportionate to the offence committed.
SOURCE: Section III. Occupied territories
Most Respectfully,
R
You are cherry picking the occupation laws. Why don't you give us the rest of the story?
Then halt the rockets.I'm 100% sure i am on the right side.
I stand for PEACE in a secular democratic state for all inhabitants of Palestine/Israel.
A one-state solution, funny. A failed state of palistan as a redistrbutionist leech stuck to Israel.I'm 100% sure i am on the right side. I stand for PEACE in a secular democratic state for all inhabitants of Palestine/Israel.
Any loyal American who understands that supporting Israel is detrimental to the best interests of their Nation.Me too. Who in their right mind would not stand for Israel?
Anyone who does not understand this should go here Who Is Bin Laden? - Interview With Osama Bin Laden (in May 1998) | Hunting Bin Laden | FRONTLINE | PBS and learn.
Any American who values having any friends in the world would support Israel.
So, again -- Israel is an "ally" we can't use for fear of pissing off too many others.I'm sure if America had asked Israel to send in troops, Israel would've obliged. But in both Gulf Wars, America didn't want Israel to help out, thereby widening the conflict. In the First Gulf War, Israel took 39 Scud hits, which was humiliating for her--but America had asked Israel not to strike back at Iraq.
This Israel/America "ally" thing is wool which has been pulled over the eyes of the American People for far too long and it is time to stop.
Are you a worker of the department of state, that you know so much about the use America has of Israel?
You speak with far too much arrogance.
So, again -- Israel is an "ally" we can't use for fear of pissing off too many others.
This Israel/America "ally" thing is wool which has been pulled over the eyes of the American People for far too long and it is time to stop.
Are you a worker of the department of state, that you know so much about the use America has of Israel?
You speak with far too much arrogance.
he is so right.
and this is increasingly the view of "those in the know" when it comes to foreign policy ...
Any loyal American who understands that supporting Israel is detrimental to the best interests of their Nation.
Anyone who does not understand this should go here Who Is Bin Laden? - Interview With Osama Bin Laden (in May 1998) | Hunting Bin Laden | FRONTLINE | PBS and learn.
Any American who values having any friends in the world would support Israel.
Any American who values having friends in the world will dump Israel like a hot rock. Our tolerance of Israeli actions is responsible for our loss of support world wide, and particularly in the Muslim world. We don't need billions of enemies.
In the war between civilization and the savage, always choose civilization.