The gun lobby has politicized the American Senate, and many Right Wing POLS

If you have a better plan, I’m listening.
How about we just start with fully enforcing existing laws?

Maybe along with it a renewed "See something say something" campaign specifically addressing potential mass/school shooters?

At the same time work to harden every school in the country against such attacks and train the school personnel how to best delay, deny, and defend if someone attempts one?
 
SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM


Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.

In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.

In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.



"

A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.

What was the rationale for the ruling?

In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
Bet you didn't have an issue with Bloomberg spending 50 million on gun control ?

 
Bet you didn't have an issue with Bloomberg spending 50 million on gun control ?

12008-thumbs-up-icon.png

And this is why the only reply was, "Silence".
 
SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM


Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.

In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.

In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.



"

A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.

What was the rationale for the ruling?

In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
Asshat the democrats benefited from that ruling. The health care industry lobbies, big pharma lobbies who do they contribute to regularly?
 
This is getting us nowhere

You do want to treat every 18 year old as a homicidal maniac

And then what?

Cross your fingers and hope they grow out of it by the time they are 21?
There are always going to be 18 year old maniac's. What there shouldn't be is unrestricted access to military weapons. We're gonna get those guns off the street.
 
Wait a minute. This took me a while. Rye Catcher is upset that an advocacy group has "politicized" Congress, a political legislative body that crafts POLICY, and politicians?


This is... breathtaking in it's disconnect from reality.


CONGRESS IS THE PROPER HOME OF POLITICS.
 
This is getting us nowhere

You do want to treat every 18 year old as a homicidal maniac

And then what?

Cross your fingers and hope they grow out of it by the time they are 21?
That’s part of it. Hopefully they snap out of it by the time they reach 21.

If they don’t snap out of it by the time they’re 21, then hopefully we have enough data on them to flag them before they do something terrible.

Both the Buffalo shooter and the Robb Elementary School shooter were 18. Do you have a better suggestion to stop them or do you just insist that we do nothing?
 
There are always going to be 18 year old maniac's. What there shouldn't be is unrestricted access to military weapons. We're gonna get those guns off the street.
The AR-15 is not a military weapon

No army in the world issues semi-auto only rifles to its soldiers
 

Forum List

Back
Top