Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 62,717
- 53,831
- 3,615
Nice dodge.You just want to pile up the dumb arguments. Good for you.
I already addressed this though.
Looks like I was correct.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Nice dodge.You just want to pile up the dumb arguments. Good for you.
I already addressed this though.
The senate has been fully politicized since the passage of the 17th Amendment which ended the appointment of Senators.SOO RIN KIM
Tue, May 31, 2022, 2:04 AM
Texas Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, who represent the state where an 18-year-old gunman carried out one of the nation's deadliest school shootings last week, are among Congress' top recipients of contributions from pro-gun donors, campaign finance records show.
Cruz, in particular, has taken in the most money from pro-gun individuals and groups of anyone in the current Congress, amassing $442,000 over the course of his career, according to an analysis of disclosure reports by the nonpartisan campaign finance research group OpenSecrets.
Cornyn ranks third among current U.S. senators and representatives, receiving a total of $340,000 in contributions from pro-gun donors over his career, after Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., who has amassed $396,000, according to the analysis.
In Texas and beyond, many politicians receive mega donations from pro-gun supporters and lobbyists, and their dollars keep them in office.
In fact, our elections are flooded with emoluments given to Members of Congress, and that was made possible by a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court.
Citizens United Explained
The 2010 Supreme Court decision further tilted political influence toward wealthy donors and corporations.www.brennancenter.org
"
A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.
What was the rationale for the ruling?
In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.
1. Because he was a loner according to his mom. Not many connections.1. He had no problem illegally murdering 21 people, so why do you think he would have trouble illegally buying a gun?
2. How would penalizing someone for a “straw purchase“ after a mass shooting prevent that shooting?
3. I have never advocated for the mentally ill to have guns. You are making that up.
Whenever you’re done congratulating yourself, I still addressed this already.Nice dodge.
Looks like I was correct.
Every lobbying group that makes donations is identified.They exist, and assholes like you call me a "hack-twit". The dollars and "presents" given to members of Congress from Corporations and the Gun Lobby are massive and dark money.
Yes. Dude was slashing his face for fun and torturing animals.You think?
Every gun can be traced to the person who bought it from a licensed dealer.1. Because he was a loner according to his mom. Not many connections.
2. It would prevent future straw purchases. If someone sells a gun to someone who murders a bunch of people, then the seller goes to prison. The next would-be seller would think twice about who they’re selling to. Selling to some weird kid wouldn’t be worth the risk.
3. So how do you propose preventing people like Ramos from obtaining a gun? Let’s hear it.
Only the RW can own guns, right?
Then why had ne not yet been adjudicated as mentally defective and rendered ineligible?Yes. Dude was slashing his face for fun and torturing animals.
He was a psychopath and he eventually would have been flagged.
You are full of shit. The abortion rights group protest in the streets, they are identifiable, gun advocates don't march and hide behind $$$ millions.
The minute we stop fighting for our rights both will be gone nationwide.Only people who are idiots think progressives will stop at AR-15's and large magazines when it comes to gun control.
That makes you a useful idiot.
Because he wasn’t reported. Yet. Easy to sneak through the cracks when he wasn’t even going to school.Then why had ne not yet been adjudicated as mentally defective and rendered ineligible?
Apparently he thinks people who do illegal gun deals keep documentation of their crimes.Every gun can be traced to the person who bought it from a licensed dealer.
Well that certainly isn't true. Over 200,000 of us were in Houston last week.You are full of shit. The abortion rights group protest in the streets, they are identifiable, gun advocates don't march and hide behind $$$ millions.
Giving it more time and the odds he ends up in the ER for a 5150 Review as well.Because he wasn’t reported. Yet. Easy to sneak through the cracks when he wasn’t even going to school.
Give it more time and the probability that he gets flagged goes up.
Don't the schools and police have an obligation here?Because he wasn’t reported.
Why do you feel such a need to lie?Of course you disagree with them. They don’t follow the ridiculous connection that you insist on.
Your idea of keeping Americans safe is to allow psychotic 18-year-olds to purchase AR-15 rifles. What could possibly go wrong, right?
If you had a winning argument to make you would not have to lie so much.Obviously not. But some are.
And you have no problem with them getting their hands on AR-15 rifles.
Horse shit all you need to do to find someone to sell you a gun illegally is find the local drug dealer who can always point you in the right direction. Many of them will themselves as they are not opposed to bartering dope for stolen guns.Possibly. The guy was a loner, so it likely would have been difficult for him to obtain one illegally. Additionally, we need to heavily penalize people who participate in straw purchases
And responsible gun owners aren’t against that. However irresponsible liberals like the ACLU make it impossible to either confine mental ill people against their will or thanks to HIPPA laws make it difficult to impossible to put the mentally ill on the prohibitive to own lists.Responsible gun owners shoudnt have a problem with checking if a person is crazy before selling them a gun because honestly it makes you look bad.