The GOP "Establishment" Will Keep Obama From Stacking The Court

[Tom Horn]

Just when the moderate GOP were being called useless, appeasing turds, now we find ourselves depending on them to save the USSC from Hussein's treachery. And the "maverick" Trump/Cruz crowd should man up enough to admit it. They will also be what defeats whichever socialist cretin the Rat party trots out to face the GOP survivor in November. And while I'm at it, I'm reminding our lost lambs that it wasn't capitulation that kept the GOP from shutting down the government over this last budget; it was a calculated gamble. The lapdog media was locked and loaded for a shutdown that never came. And instead of having to defend the GOP candidate from that, the coffers still hold the money and influence to use when it counts; to retake the White House.

 

[Dot Com]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

 

[Tom Horn]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

 

[Dot Com]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

...said the n00b. I'll take that under advisement hack boi

 

[Tom Horn]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

...said the n00b. I'll take that under advisement hack boi

New here but I been kicking your type's ass around the block for years, comrade.

 

[oreo]

Just when the moderate GOP were being called useless, appeasing turds, now we find ourselves depending on them to save the USSC from Hussein's treachery. And the "maverick" Trump/Cruz crowd should man up enough to admit it. They will also be what defeats whichever socialist cretin the Rat party trots out to face the GOP survivor in November. And while I'm at it, I'm reminding our lost lambs that it wasn't capitulation that kept the GOP from shutting down the government over this last budget; it was a calculated gamble. The lapdog media was locked and loaded for a shutdown that never came. And instead of having to defend the GOP candidate from that, the coffers still hold the money and influence to use when it counts; to retake the White House.

Yeah I am certain they're going to do that--BUT it will backfire on them. Hillary Clinton is already out there campaigning on the Obstructionist party.

A lot of people think that they're going to get another Scalia--they won't. He was appointed in 1986, and you're just not going to get someone that conservative in this day & age. Democrats in the Senate would never vote for him. So you're going to get another John Roberts--(middle of the road) judge--regardless of who is sitting in the Oval office.

 

[Dot Com]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

...said the n00b. I'll take that under advisement hack boi

New here but I been kicking your type's ass around the block for years, comrade.

where? Some sub-par forum w/ weak participants? It aint working here, whatever you were doing. THAT MUCH is obvious

BTW- are you from the Snack Gang?

 

[Contumacious]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

IF BY SOME MIRACLE COMRADE SANDERS GETS ELECTED MITCH McCONELL MUST DELAY FOR 4 YEARS

 

[Tom Horn]

BTW- are you from the Snack Gang?

"snack gang"

 

[Tom Horn]

Yeah I am certain they're going to do that--BUT it will backfire on them. Hillary Clinton is already out there campaigning on the Obstructionist party.

A lot of people think that they're going to get another Scalia--they won't. He was appointed in 1986, and you're just not going to get someone that conservative in this day & age. Democrats in the Senate would never vote for him. So you're going to get another John Roberts--(middle of the road) judge--regardless of who is sitting in the Oval office.

While Roberts disappointed us on the Barry-Care fiasco, he's been a decent Justice on other matters. I agree we may never see another Scalia, but then we didn't know who he was when first appointed either. I don't see how keeping the Kenyan from recess-appointing a leftist judge can backfire....He's already appointed two Justices so we know what ilk he'd choose from. And remember, a recess-appointment is just that. A Supreme must eventually be confirmed by the Senate so anybody he sticks in there is only temporary.

 

[Dot Com]

BTW- are you from the Snack Gang?

"snack gang"

"send snacks" doesn't ring a bell? Google that phrase

Seriously though, your partisan hack thread is unnecessary.

 

[Tom Horn]

"send snacks" doesn't ring a bell? Google that phrase

Seriously though, your partisan hack thread is unnecessary.

Seems to have lit a fire under your ass eh?

 

[Disir]

"send snacks" doesn't ring a bell? Google that phrase

Seriously though, your partisan hack thread is unnecessary.

Seems to have lit a fire under your ass eh?

Can you present a viable argument against Srinivasan?

 

[IcebergSlim]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

...said the n00b. I'll take that under advisement hack boi

New here but I been kicking your type's ass around the block for years, comrade.

Pace yourself, son.......You're in for a long year.....

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

filling a vacancy on his watch is considered "stacking"? My but you are a Rightard. Put down the kool aid kiddo.

You need to take a timeout, sonny....gonna be a long day and you're already exhausted.

...said the n00b. I'll take that under advisement hack boi

New here but I been kicking your type's ass around the block for years, comrade.

where? Some sub-par forum w/ weak participants? It aint working here, whatever you were doing. THAT MUCH is obvious

BTW- are you from the Snack Gang?

Look at dotcommie puffing his bird chest.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

BTW- are you from the Snack Gang?

"snack gang"

"send snacks" doesn't ring a bell? Google that phrase

Seriously though, your partisan hack thread is unnecessary.

I'm gonna have to ask to see your forum badge

 

[IcebergSlim]

Yeah I am certain they're going to do that--BUT it will backfire on them. Hillary Clinton is already out there campaigning on the Obstructionist party.

A lot of people think that they're going to get another Scalia--they won't. He was appointed in 1986, and you're just not going to get someone that conservative in this day & age. Democrats in the Senate would never vote for him. So you're going to get another John Roberts--(middle of the road) judge--regardless of who is sitting in the Oval office.

While Roberts disappointed us on the Barry-Care fiasco, he's been a decent Justice on other matters. I agree we may never see another Scalia, but then we didn't know who he was when first appointed either. I don't see how keeping the Kenyan from recess-appointing a leftist judge can backfire....He's already appointed two Justices so we know what ilk he'd choose from. And remember, a recess-appointment is just that. A Supreme must eventually be confirmed by the Senate so anybody he sticks in there is only temporary.

we may never see another Scalia, but then we didn't know who he was when first appointed either.


WTF?

 

[Tom Horn]

Can you present a viable argument against Srinivasan?

Another solicitor general like Kegan who was born in INDIA? please....

 

[rdean]

Just when the moderate GOP were being called useless, appeasing turds, now we find ourselves depending on them to save the USSC from Hussein's treachery. And the "maverick" Trump/Cruz crowd should man up enough to admit it. They will also be what defeats whichever socialist cretin the Rat party trots out to face the GOP survivor in November. And while I'm at it, I'm reminding our lost lambs that it wasn't capitulation that kept the GOP from shutting down the government over this last budget; it was a calculated gamble. The lapdog media was locked and loaded for a shutdown that never came. And instead of having to defend the GOP candidate from that, the coffers still hold the money and influence to use when it counts; to retake the White House.

Stacking it? You mean like Republicans did?

Keeping the president from doing what he was elected to do by the majority of the American people?

How very patriotic.

 

[Indeependent]

I would prefer an independent minded Justice as opposed to a Liberal but Obama is STILL President for 11 more months despite anybody's opinion of his leadership.