Now that we can Impeach US Citizens, Obama is at top of the list when GOP retake Congress...

[Turtlesoup]

Bill Clinton needs to be Impeached for being a pedophile, having sex with kids (although not frowned upon by Democrats)

In all fairness to billy---atleast the kids that he was molesting were post-puberty---Joe and his son were seeking younger ones.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

Everywhere I go, even CNN and MSNBC, they are turning on Biden already. Maybe to get him out of the way and install their Marxist girl?

Already the worst President in US history.

 

[easyt65]

Everywhere I go, even CNN and MSNBC, they are turning on Biden already. Maybe to get him out of the way and install their Marxist girl? Already the worst President in US history.

From the very start, for 47 long years as a politician, Joe Biden was a worthless piece of shit.

He never did a thing for all the tax dollars he was paid except to enrich himself and his family.

He was wrong about ever foreign policy decision he ever made....and as a candidate he was wrong about President Trump's Life-Saving Travel Bans. Joe DID call the travel bans 'Xenophobic' (despite his having his press secretary declaring saying he did so is 'Unfair'), and he led the Democrats in opposition to them. While he was in the press calling Trump a racist for imposing them, Democrats were writing legislation to block them. not long after Biden came out and admitted they were a good idea. NOW, not onlyhas Biden extended them, he has added another country to them.

Every American who saw his infamous CONFESSION on videotape saw the corrupt bastard laughing and bragging how he had EXTORTED the former Ukrainian PM to save his son's ass...with Obama's knowledge that he was doing it, according to Biden.
-- This only proved the complete STUPIDITY of snowflakes, just like Jonathon Gruber declared . Joe Biden himself bragged about committing extortion, and snowflakes defended Joe by declaring Joe was a liar, that he did NOT Extort the Ukraine PM.

Before the election the FBI, DHS, and Treasury Departments PUBLICLY declared they had hard, physical evidence - to include financial documents - proving Joe Biden and his family were GUILTY of financial scandals that included Influence Peddling, Bribery, Money Laundering FOR Russian Oligarchs, and accepting over $1 BILLION from the CCP.
- For that money so far Biden has blamed President Trump for the virus created in a CCP lab and unleashed on the world, defended China after the CCP declared it would murder millions of Americans by withholding critical medicines Americans need that they provide to the US, and more recently President Biden just reversed a Trump policy that prevented CCP-associated companies from having access to and working on US Power Grids. WTF?!

More than enough evidence of the Biden Crime Family's criminal activity exists - as per the FBI, DHS, and Treasury Departments, but also because Hunter Biden is so drugged up and stupid that he left his laptop full of evidence of financial scams and family-kiddie porn in a computer repair shop to be found, turned into the FBI, and the contents leaked to the media.
- The entire family is filled with unintelligent fu@k-ups.

But snowflakes are a special kind of stupid, not to be undone or set back by a bunch of facts and evidence. They doubled-down on 'stupid' and made every kind of excuse they could to argue none of the evidence was real...or they just ignored it and pretended / pretend it doesn't existence.

The media completely ignored all of this as well, preferring to focus on their hatred for President Trump.

Then here was the mental incompetency:
- Stuttering
- Freezing
- Babbling
- Forgetting where he was
- Forgetting what job he was running for
- Forgetting what his wife looked like / was
- Saying stupid /racist shit

It was OBVIOUS Joe wasn't / isn't all there.

He stayed locked up in a basement
He came out to speak to a dozen or less people
He needed 3 days rest / sleep / prep for a debate

...and we are to believe that 81 MILLION American sheep voted for all of THAT....

Riiiiiiiiight.

Republicans aren't going to have to worry about Impeaching his ass. Bernie Sanders said the other day, "We are pushing Biden to the left as hard as we can, and for his 1st week in office he's doing pretty good. We'll have to see after this."

'We'll have to see?' 'Veiled threat', anyone? Biden is also 'compromised' as President by his mental health. Sanders, Harris, and far Leftists will continue to manipulate Biden until he stops short of they want....and at that point they will remove him via the 25th Amendment and make Harris President.

 

[Pogo]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Backpedaling and deflecting already like the retard you are fuckstick. Sorry asshole, the articles weren’t delivered that day. Process incomplete. Job not done. As Roberts told you. Leahy can “preside “ all he wants. It means nothing. That word SHALL stumps you doesn’t it? You can eat shit, **** off, and die. I don’t give a ****. But making you look like a fool is such fun asshole.

Yuh huh

​

 

[easyt65]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Backpedaling and deflecting already like the retard you are fuckstick. Sorry asshole, the articles weren’t delivered that day. Process incomplete. Job not done. As Roberts told you. Leahy can “preside “ all he wants. It means nothing. That word SHALL stumps you doesn’t it? You can eat shit, **** off, and die. I don’t give a ****. But making you look like a fool is such fun asshole.

Yuh huh

​

The kids table is down the hall and to the left.....if you hurry you'll still make it in time for breakfast.

 

[Pogo]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Leahy can not legally preside, and no one will go along with that.

You want Harris to do it then?

Roberts won't do it, and doesn't have to since Rump is no longer President. Nowhere does the Constitution say who can't preside at the trial of a non-President. What it does say is: "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside." Whelp.... this isn't a current President being tried. Is it. Unless of course you believe the lying orange ************ and his delusions of landslides.

>> Indeed, the reason that the chief justice's role in a presidential impeachment trial appears in the Constitution at all is the often-forgotten power given to the vice president as the presiding officer of the Senate. Thus, in any impeachment trial of an officer who is not president, the vice president may preside.​

​

Vice President Thomas Jefferson presided at the impeachment trial of Sen. William Blount in 1799; Aaron Burr presided at the impeachment trial of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.​

​

In modern times, impeachment trial votes in the Senate — most often to remove federal judges — have been presided over not by the vice president either, but by the president pro tempore of the Senate. <<​

Whelp ---- that's Leahy.

 

[Pogo]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Backpedaling and deflecting already like the retard you are fuckstick. Sorry asshole, the articles weren’t delivered that day. Process incomplete. Job not done. As Roberts told you. Leahy can “preside “ all he wants. It means nothing. That word SHALL stumps you doesn’t it? You can eat shit, **** off, and die. I don’t give a ****. But making you look like a fool is such fun asshole.

Yuh huh

​

The kids table is down the hall and to the left.....if you hurry you'll still make it in time for breakfast.

I think if he gets there he'll start throwing food. Clearly he's in continuous meltdown. I've seen grilled cheese panini that hadn't melted down that far. This is typical, although one of the more extreme cases, of the emotional investment required for a Cult. They melt.

 

[easyt65]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Leahy can not legally preside, and no one will go along with that.

You want Harris to do it then?

Roberts won't do it, and doesn't have to since Rump is no longer President. Nowhere does the Constitution say who can't preside at the trial of a non-President. What it does say is: "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside." Whelp.... this isn't a current President being tried. Is it. Unless of course you believe the lying orange ************ and his delusions of landslides.

>> Indeed, the reason that the chief justice's role in a presidential impeachment trial appears in the Constitution at all is the often-forgotten power given to the vice president as the presiding officer of the Senate. Thus, in any impeachment trial of an officer who is not president, the vice president may preside.​

​

Vice President Thomas Jefferson presided at the impeachment trial of Sen. William Blount in 1799; Aaron Burr presided at the impeachment trial of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.​

​

In modern times, impeachment trial votes in the Senate — most often to remove federal judges — have been presided over not by the vice president either, but by the president pro tempore of the Senate. <<​

Whelp ---- that's Leahy.

Roberts refusing to oversee the Impeachment is the subtle declaration that the Impeachment of a civilian is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL and thus the USSC / a USSC Justice has no part in it.

 

[Pogo]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Leahy can not legally preside, and no one will go along with that.

You want Harris to do it then?

Roberts won't do it, and doesn't have to since Rump is no longer President. Nowhere does the Constitution say who can't preside at the trial of a non-President. What it does say is: "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside." Whelp.... this isn't a current President being tried. Is it. Unless of course you believe the lying orange ************ and his delusions of landslides.

>> Indeed, the reason that the chief justice's role in a presidential impeachment trial appears in the Constitution at all is the often-forgotten power given to the vice president as the presiding officer of the Senate. Thus, in any impeachment trial of an officer who is not president, the vice president may preside.​

​

Vice President Thomas Jefferson presided at the impeachment trial of Sen. William Blount in 1799; Aaron Burr presided at the impeachment trial of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase in 1805.​

​

In modern times, impeachment trial votes in the Senate — most often to remove federal judges — have been presided over not by the vice president either, but by the president pro tempore of the Senate. <<​

Whelp ---- that's Leahy.

Roberts refusing to oversee the Impeachment is the subtle declaration that the Impeachment of a civilian is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL and thus the USSC / a USSC Justice has no part in it.

On the contrary it 'declares' nothing but it does denote that the individual being tried is not the current President. On the date of the impeachment (January 13) the target WAS the current POTUS. That's already done, two weeks ago. The individual impeached, was in fact the President. The CJ is not involved in the impeachment; he's involved in the trial.

If it WERE the current President being tried (and if the trial had begun before January 20), his presiding would be required. But now, according to a strict reading of the Constitution, it's not. So he took the easy way out. Enter Leahy. aaaaand SCENE.

 

[Mustang]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.

Thanks, Democrats!

My father used to say something to me when I was in my early teens. He used to say, 'don't behave as if stupidity were a virtue.' I know it sounds like it was an insult, but he didn't mean it that way. It was simply an admonishment (or a warning) to think before I spoke, and to actually KNOW what I was talking about before saying or doing x, y, or z. It was great advice, and it's served me well my whole life. It sounds as if conservatives would have benefited from that advice, but they never took it to heart even if someone told them the same thing.

I say this because the stupidity of conservatives never ceases to amaze me.

Trump was impeached while he was still in office. What's coming up is a trial to determine whether or not Trump will be convicted. But Trump was impeached a week before he left office.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/house-trump-impeachment-vote-01-13-21/index.html

 

[jasonnfree]

Looks like Biden jacked up his net worth honestly. He wasn't my first choice but he sure seems to be kicking ass, especially on the pandemic issue to which this trump character gave little to no attention at all.

How Joe Biden Went from Middle-Class Joe to a Millionaire

Take a look at the president's financial documents.

www.townandcountrymag.com

 

[L.K.Eder]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.he

Thanks, Democrats!

What the **** toilet sewer did you trawl to find this dumbass link?

Oh I see. It's Jim the **** Hoft. Predictable. Apparently the Stupidest Man on the Internets still hasn't figured out that Rump was impeached while he was still President. Which is, after all, why he's the Stupidest Man on the Internets.

And yet ---- YOU thought it was worthy of a thread.

Hm, perhaps Jim the **** Hoft has some competition.

Hey retarded monkey boy, have the Articles been delivered to the Senate? That would be NO! Thus the process is not complete and Trump was not impeached while President. Slogo has now claimed the “title” of Dumbest “man” on the Internet. Since “he” also drinks from the toilet that explains a few things..

Yup, they have. And as I predicted Patrick Leahy will preside.

Will there be anything else today besides your own ass?

Sorry fuckwad, you didn’t complete the process while Trump was in office. You also were slapped stupid by Trump using the words peacefully protest in his speech (you then ran like a ***** from that thread). You miss that part of the Constitution that says the Chief Justice of SCOTUS SHALL preside over this moron? Leahy can not legally preside. Thus this is all unconstitutional and illegal. Point out where the Senate may try a private citizen? Would you like more of your own shit with that crow retard?

I'm not a member of Congress, shitferbrains.

Rump was impeached January 13. O lucky day. That got done.
And yes, Leahy is set to preside. You can whine about it all you want. I don't give a ****. Nor does Congress.

Backpedaling and deflecting already like the retard you are fuckstick. Sorry asshole, the articles weren’t delivered that day. Process incomplete. Job not done. As Roberts told you. Leahy can “preside “ all he wants. It means nothing. That word SHALL stumps you doesn’t it? You can eat shit, **** off, and die. I don’t give a ****. But making you look like a fool is such fun asshole.

Yuh huh

​

careful with such pictures. creepy ghouls will use it to claim that biden has molested this kid.

 

[Flash]

I bet the RINOs in the Senate will go along with it because they have bent the knee to their Democrat Scumbag masters.

 

[easyt65]

If We Can Now Impeach Former US Presidents, Why Don't We Start with Crooked Obama? | The Gateway Pundit | by Joe Hoft

According to today's corrupt politicians in DC you can now impeach a former President. If this is the case then let's start with Obama.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Democrats have now set the precedence for Impeaching US citizens / former Presidents...

...setting up for Barak Obama's Impeachment when Republicans retake Congress.

During his 8 years in office, Barry:

- Violated Constitution and Law

- Admitted he was violating the Constitution

- Was found guilty of being in Contempt of Court several times for violating Judges' orders

-Was found in violation of the Constitution by the USSC several times

- Illegally spied on Americans, reporters, the media, US Senators, USSC Justices, and a President

- Weaponized the IRS & used it illegally against American citizens who legally opposed his re-election

- Armed, trained, financed, supplied, protected, & defended FOREIGN terrorists, and used the US military to help Al Qaeda kill a sovereign nation's leader who was helping the coalition fight terrorists in Both Africa and help them take over their own nation...

- Interfered in several foreign nation's and our own elections ... helped a terrorist group take over allied Egypt

- Committed U.N.-defined International War Crime by invading a sovereign nation without that nation or govt asking him to or giving him permission to (Syria)

- Attempted a failed political coup to overthrow the US govt by illegally removing a US President from power with the help of the Russian Intel Service and a foreign ex-spy

Good thing there is no Statute of Limitations for Revenge Impeachment of US Citizens.

Thanks, Democrats!

My father used to say something to me when I was in my early teens. He used to say, 'don't behave as if stupidity were a virtue.' I know it sounds like it was an insult, but he didn't mean it that way. It was simply an admonishment (or a warning) to think before I spoke, and to actually KNOW what I was talking about before saying or doing x, y, or z. It was great advice, and it's served me well my whole life. It sounds as if conservatives would have benefited from that advice, but they never took it to heart even if someone told them the same thing.

I say this because the stupidity of conservatives never ceases to amaze me.

Trump was impeached while he was still in office. What's coming up is a trial to determine whether or not Trump will be convicted. But Trump was impeached a week before he left office.

https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/house-trump-impeachment-vote-01-13-21/index.html

My entire quote, my entire post, of course - for those not bright enough to follow, was to make a point:

Democrats aren't even close to being the brightest bulb in the package, as they act out of extreme emotion without thinking things through or giving thought to their consequences.

They are setting a precedence right now that any Party can reach back in time to Impeach any President at any time for whatever reason.

I have already laid out all the crimes Barak Obama could not only be Impeached for but also prosecuted for, if Statute of Limitations no longer applied to crimes as they no longer do for Impeachments.

OF COURSE the Republican Party would never - and should never - sink to the depths of insanity the Democrats have out of mentally unstable, irrational hate-driven, 'Orange Man Bad' hatred and the desire for revenge for losing an election and exposing their politicians and fake news media for who they are....

...but the Democrats have made it possible for the Republicans to do so if they choose to do so if ever in power again.

Just as they were so distracted by their hate and desire for revenge with the 1st admitted politically partisan Impeachment that they never saw the pandemic coming, the Democrats are plunging headlong into another admitted politically partisan Impeachment.

 

[easyt65]

careful with such pictures. creepy ghouls will use it to claim that biden has molested this kid.

Like Hunter Biden has molested family members in his family porn home movies?

 

[L.K.Eder]

careful with such pictures. creepy ghouls will use it to claim that biden has molested this kid.

Like Hunter Biden has molested family members in his family porn home movies?

you would know, creeper.

 

[easyt65]

Like Hunter Biden has molested family members in his family porn home movies?

you would know, creeper.

EVERYONE knows, snowflake - his family porn movies were leaked to the internet.

lol