Will John McCain and Lindsey Graham help obama pass his judge to the court?

[2aguy]

Considering that John McCain has always tried to screw over actual conservatives.....how long before he sides with obama and tries to help him pass through a radical lefty judge to fill the vacancy....?

 

[hangover]

Another thread made the possibility of Obama becoming a Justice the karma of con obstruction. 33% of the senate is up for reelection this year too.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

 

[hangover]

The Senate should do its job, period.

What are the odds.?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Will John McCain and Lindsey Graham help obama pass his judge to the court?"

Wrong question.

Correct question: will Senate republicans do their jobs and respect the will of the the American people by timely confirming a replacement for the Supreme Court, or will they play partisan politics and ignore the Constitution and the will of the people and make an attempt to block the nomination for no other reason than their unwarranted animosity toward the president.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

What are the odds.?

Roughly zero, these days.

 

[hangover]

The Senate should do its job, period.

What are the odds.?

Roughly zero, these days.

Establishment cons just might be having thoughts that their obstruction could cost them the majority in the senate AND the White House. Which could make the possibility of Bernie appointing Shrillary to the bench...or Shrillary appointing Obama to the bench. Man, I'm drooling!

 

[eagle1462010]

Considering that John McCain has always tried to screw over actual conservatives.....how long before he sides with obama and tries to help him pass through a radical lefty judge to fill the vacancy....?

That will depend on the amount of bribes given out.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

 

[Fang]

Considering that John McCain has always tried to screw over actual conservatives.....how long before he sides with obama and tries to help him pass through a radical lefty judge to fill the vacancy....?

No. Lindsey Graham was on FoxNews yesterday pretty adamant the Senate hold firm and not pass anyone Obama nominates, unless in the unlikely situation he actually nominates someone we can all agree on. Graham cited Harry Reid's own rules in holding firm.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

indeed you are incorrect

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

indeed you are incorrect

Nope. That's not Advise and Consent, that's not doing your job, something the American people are already seriously pissed off about.

Paying the Congress for nothing, and now the Supreme Court for nothing? No thanks.

 

[Fang]

"Will John McCain and Lindsey Graham help obama pass his judge to the court?"

Wrong question.

Correct question: will Senate republicans do their jobs and respect the will of the the American people by timely confirming a replacement for the Supreme Court, or will they play partisan politics and ignore the Constitution and the will of the people and make an attempt to block the nomination for no other reason than their unwarranted animosity toward the president.

That's the biggest bunch of horseshit I've read. Obama ignored the will of the people in slamming Obamacare down our throats. Liberals only want to respect the will of the people when it benefits their ideology. The Senate needs to hold firm and push to the next President. If Hillary is elected then you get what you want. If a Republican is elected, then the WILL OF THE PEOPLE has spoken. In either scenario YOU win.

 

[jon_berzerk]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

indeed you are incorrect

Nope. That's not Advise and Consent, that's not doing your job, something the American people are already seriously pissed off about.

what the article says is the president has the power

if he has consent of congress

a no vote is the same as not giving consent

cry all you want

 

[80zephyr]

The Senate should do its job, period.

What is its job?

Mark

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

indeed you are incorrect

Nope. That's not Advise and Consent, that's not doing your job, something the American people are already seriously pissed off about.

what the article says is the president has the power

if he has consent of congress

a no vote is the same as not giving consent

cry all you want

They are promising no vote, not a no vote. They are nothing alike.

And, I'm not worried, If they pull it, they're fucked, not to mention, going against the Original Intent of the Constitution...

 

[Desperado]

Of course those two rinos will do whatever Obama wants.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The Senate should do its job, period.

What is its job?

To vote on who is nominated. Advise and Consent.

"The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."
Advice and consent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[jon_berzerk]

it is period

Not if it refuses to vote...

indeed you are incorrect

Nope. That's not Advise and Consent, that's not doing your job, something the American people are already seriously pissed off about.

what the article says is the president has the power

if he has consent of congress

a no vote is the same as not giving consent

cry all you want

They are promising no vote, not a no vote. They are nothing alike.

And, I'm not worried, If they pull it, they're fucked, not to mention, going against the Original Intent of the Constitution...

the Constitution does not say they have to provide a vote

no vote is not giving consent

and the president would be advised of that

the libtard crystal ball is strong today

--LOL