Dadoalex
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2021
- 13,894
- 5,926
- 208
Source of the quote moron.Why would you think that? Longing for a Nazi buzz?That's Mien Kompf
You know, your bible.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Source of the quote moron.Why would you think that? Longing for a Nazi buzz?That's Mien Kompf
The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warmingThe thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere
Never lie.And you lie every post. You’re ownedThat makes two lies. Liar.Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be ownedYou said CO2 GENERATES heat
Still nothing to do with the OP, get thereNever lie.And you lie every post. You’re ownedThat makes two lies. Liar.Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be ownedYou said CO2 GENERATES heat
Don't repeat lies.
Acknowledge when I'm wrong.
You on the other hand?
Never lie...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Don't repeat lies...except constantly...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Acknowledge when you're wrong...Please. Too stupid to know the difference.
Fun living in Trumplandia?
Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?
However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.
Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.
CO2 traps heat, got it!
Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?
The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.
Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors
Say what? What alternate reality did you pull that insanity out of?and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM.
Yep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming
Yep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming
They make 'em seriously dumb in Denierstan. I suppose it's the commie education they got.
Fuck-off-troll degrees.
How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?
Fuck-off-troll degrees.
How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?
Ask a trolling question, get a trolling answer.
Fuck-off-troll degrees.
How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?
Ask a trolling question, get a trolling answer.
No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?
Post the link that says you’re rightYep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming
They make 'em seriously dumb in Denierstan. I suppose it's the commie education they got.
So no numerical answer
No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?
In post #7, I replied to your OP in detail. You haven't addressed it. You just ran, like you do so often.
It's kind of sad. Your cult is failing, and you don't know what to do, so you troll all day. I know what you should do. Just leave your cult. Cut your losses. Instead of pouting on the internet all day, go have a life.
Barring that, you could try debating. Post #7 is still there.
No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?
In post #7, I replied to your OP in detail. You haven't addressed it. You just ran, like you do so often.
It's kind of sad. Your cult is failing, and you don't know what to do, so you troll all day. I know what you should do. Just leave your cult. Cut your losses. Instead of pouting on the internet all day, go have a life.
Barring that, you could try debating. Post #7 is still there.
OP is a lie.Still nothing to do with the OP, get thereNever lie.And you lie every post. You’re ownedThat makes two lies. Liar.Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be ownedYou said CO2 GENERATES heat
Don't repeat lies.
Acknowledge when I'm wrong.
You on the other hand?
Never lie...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Don't repeat lies...except constantly...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Acknowledge when you're wrong...Please. Too stupid to know the difference.
Fun living in Trumplandia?
WOW!Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?
However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.
Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.
CO2 traps heat, got it!
Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?
The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.
Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.
Hide the decline!
Neither is Australia.WOW!Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?
However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.
Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.
CO2 traps heat, got it!
Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?
The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.
Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.
Hide the decline!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...
US is not global.
Geez.
As soon as i have elected officials in China and Russia to talk to...Neither is Australia.WOW!Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?
However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.
Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.
CO2 traps heat, got it!
Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?
The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.
Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.
Hide the decline!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...
US is not global.
Geez.
btw, stop targeting the US only then if you feel that way. China’s got the globe not us. Stop already
As soon as i have elected officials in China and Russia to talk to...Neither is Australia.WOW!Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?
However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.
Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.
CO2 traps heat, got it!
Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?
The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.
The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.
Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.
Hide the decline!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...
US is not global.
Geez.
btw, stop targeting the US only then if you feel that way. China’s got the globe not us. Stop already
Wait? didn't we just get rid of that guy?