The Four Main Fails of AGW

[Dadoalex]

That's Mien Kompf

Why would you think that? Longing for a Nazi buzz?

Source of the quote moron.
You know, your bible.

 

[jc456]

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere

The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming

 

[Dadoalex]

You said CO2 GENERATES heat

Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be owned

That makes two lies. Liar.

And you lie every post. You’re owned

Never lie.
Don't repeat lies.
Acknowledge when I'm wrong.

You on the other hand?
Never lie...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Don't repeat lies...except constantly...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Acknowledge when you're wrong...Please. Too stupid to know the difference.

Fun living in Trumplandia?

 

[jc456]

You said CO2 GENERATES heat

Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be owned

That makes two lies. Liar.

And you lie every post. You’re owned

Never lie.
Don't repeat lies.
Acknowledge when I'm wrong.

You on the other hand?
Never lie...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Don't repeat lies...except constantly...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Acknowledge when you're wrong...Please. Too stupid to know the difference.

Fun living in Trumplandia?

Still nothing to do with the OP, get there

 

[CrusaderFrank]

So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?

Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".

However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.

Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.

CO2 traps heat, got it!

Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.

Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.

Hide the decline!

 

[mamooth]

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors

And yet they're really damn good.

That would indicate that they take into account all the important factors.

and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM.

Say what? What alternate reality did you pull that insanity out of?

The other deniers says the opposite, that the greenhouse gas bands are saturated, so adding more has no effect. You should all get together and settle on one single delusional cult conspiracy theory. Having conflicting cult conspiracy theories makes you look bad.

 

[mamooth]

The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming

Yep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.

They make 'em seriously dumb in Denierstan. I suppose it's the commie education they got.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming

Yep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.

They make 'em seriously dumb in Denierstan. I suppose it's the commie education they got.

How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?

 

[mamooth]

How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?

Fuck-off-troll degrees.

Ask a trolling question, get a trolling answer.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?

Fuck-off-troll degrees.

Ask a trolling question, get a trolling answer.

Science!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

How much warmer is the question? 7 degrees? 2 billion degrees?

Fuck-off-troll degrees.

Ask a trolling question, get a trolling answer.

No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?

 

[mamooth]

No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?

In post #7, I replied to your OP in detail. You haven't addressed it. You just ran, like you do so often.

It's kind of sad. Your cult is failing, and you don't know what to do, so you troll all day. I know what you should do. Just leave your cult. Cut your losses. Instead of pouting on the internet all day, go have a life.

Barring that, you could try debating. Post #7 is still there.

 

[jc456]

The question remains, if C02 can’t create heat, it can’t cause temperature rise and can’t contribute to global warming

Yep, we got another one saying a blanket can't make a person warmer.

They make 'em seriously dumb in Denierstan. I suppose it's the commie education they got.

Post the link that says you’re right

 

[jc456]

No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?

In post #7, I replied to your OP in detail. You haven't addressed it. You just ran, like you do so often.

It's kind of sad. Your cult is failing, and you don't know what to do, so you troll all day. I know what you should do. Just leave your cult. Cut your losses. Instead of pouting on the internet all day, go have a life.

Barring that, you could try debating. Post #7 is still there.

So no numerical answer

 

[CrusaderFrank]

No numerical answer? All the consensus! All the peer review, but no number? How is that science?

In post #7, I replied to your OP in detail. You haven't addressed it. You just ran, like you do so often.

It's kind of sad. Your cult is failing, and you don't know what to do, so you troll all day. I know what you should do. Just leave your cult. Cut your losses. Instead of pouting on the internet all day, go have a life.

Barring that, you could try debating. Post #7 is still there.

There was no numerical answer in #7.

Did you mean in some other thread?

 

[Dadoalex]

You said CO2 GENERATES heat

Nope never ever never ever and you continue to be owned

That makes two lies. Liar.

And you lie every post. You’re owned

Never lie.
Don't repeat lies.
Acknowledge when I'm wrong.

You on the other hand?
Never lie...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Don't repeat lies...except constantly...Too stupid to know the difference...Trump Defense
Acknowledge when you're wrong...Please. Too stupid to know the difference.

Fun living in Trumplandia?

Still nothing to do with the OP, get there

OP is a lie.
Post I responded to is a lie.

There, commented on the OP.
Satisfied liar?

 

[Dadoalex]

So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?

Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".

However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.

Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.

CO2 traps heat, got it!

Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.

Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.

Hide the decline!

WOW!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...

US is not global.

Geez.

 

[jc456]

So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?

Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".

However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.

Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.

CO2 traps heat, got it!

Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.

Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.

Hide the decline!

WOW!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...

US is not global.

Geez.

Neither is Australia.

btw, stop targeting the US only then if you feel that way. China’s got the globe not us. Stop already

 

[Dadoalex]

So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?

Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".

However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.

Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.

CO2 traps heat, got it!

Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.

Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.

Hide the decline!

WOW!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...

US is not global.

Geez.

Neither is Australia.

btw, stop targeting the US only then if you feel that way. China’s got the globe not us. Stop already

As soon as i have elected officials in China and Russia to talk to...

Wait? didn't we just get rid of that guy?

 

[westwall]

So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?

Your argument has become "You say CO2 traps heat, therefore you say CO2 creates heat!".

However, trapping and creating are two entirely different things, and even you're not stupid enough not to know that.

Your dishonesty here is deliberate, so there's no reason to talk to you. After all, it's a given that you will simply lie in response to anything that anyone says.

CO2 traps heat, got it!

Give us a whole number between 0 and infinity to describe how much heat it "Traps" as measured by temperature when we increase CO2 from 280 to 400 PPM. You know ppm stands for parts per MILLION, right?

The thing about CO2 in atmosphere is that it is much more complex than we realize for many factors, like the absorption of the oceans and the effects of ionization in the upper atmosphere.

The computer models that the Climate Scientists use really don't take into account all the factors and that is why it doesn't act like a greenhouse gas within a couple of hundred PPM. The earth buffers a significant amount of CO2 through natural processes.

Because their models fail in real life the Climate Scientists have been caught red handed fabricating data. That is why they have very little credibility.

Hide the decline!

WOW!
A meaningless graph!
OH, BTW...

US is not global.

Geez.

Neither is Australia.

btw, stop targeting the US only then if you feel that way. China’s got the globe not us. Stop already

As soon as i have elected officials in China and Russia to talk to...

Wait? didn't we just get rid of that guy?

No, the CURRENT guy is the one revoking the sanctions that the former guy had in place. So now pootin, your hero, can sell his natural gas direct to Germany which weakens NATO, and the USA's position in the world.

But you have to be honest to admit that the new guy is selling this country out.