- May 20, 2009
- Reaction score
then why do all of the warmers say it does? they say it adds to the energy budget. Post cartoons and illistrated colors of such nonsense. Shit, even posted a video from Mythbuster's in here saying the CO2 chamber got hotter. Can only be one explanation into that comment. And that is that wrongly posted position that CO2 adds to the energy budget and makes us warmer. hahahahahahaha, you're arguing with us, not against us. We're asking for that evidence from those dumbshits that CO2 adds warmth. still waiting. Frank is asking them to post how that is possible.Understand?No, HE didn't.Asked and answered.Here's the problem kids.Here are the 4 main reasons why AGW fails:
1. There are no experiments. The central pillar is that an increase in a negligible atmospheric gas is generating heat that will soon end all life on Earth. Well, how much additional heat does the 120 ppm of CO2 generate? Why is there never a non-imaginary number provided by the lab work?
2. This additional planet killing atmospheric heat in 1 above is somehow also heating the oceans down 700m deep? Yet, it takes far more energy to heat water than air. Where is that missing energy?
3. So many failed predictions! Any real scientist would have had to discard the flawed theory and moved on, AGW is impervious to its graphic, public misses
4. The AGW Cult; yes, it's a Cult, because it's religion, not science, is oblivious to the fact that China generates more of this imaginary planet killing gas than all industrial nations combined and double the output of the USA. If this really was science and an existential threat, all the efforts would be on dialing back Chinese output. Instead, the AGW Cult excuses the ChiComs for being allowed to continue spewing this imaginary planet killing gas for 20 years beyond the latest alleged tipping point.
People who pretend to understand science.
CO2 doesn't produce heat.
CO2 retains heat not allowing it to escape to space.
And when you don't understand the science you are, of course, prone to making stupid suggestions.
So, does the heat retained by CO2 raise temperature?
If you've a point, make it.
He did. The AGW crowd is an anti science religious cult.
Sylvia Brown, a KNOWN charlatan, has a far better predictive rate than ANY climatologists. ANYWHERE.
If HE wants a class in thermodynamics, hydrodynamics. chemistry and general physics I suggest HE go back to school.
As brilliant as I am this is no place to be teaching high school science.
Yes, he did. The fact that you don't understand the scientific method shows me you are nothing but a liar.
Understand that this moron thinks CO2 PRODUCES heat?
Then uses his own bit of stupidity as the foundation for why HE BELIEVES global warming is false.
All I've done here is pointed out that mistake.
Science likes it when mistakes are found.
Brings it closer to the truth.
Charlatan liars don't like it when their mistakes are found because they know their "mistakes" are really lies.
So tell me...
HOW DOES CO2 PRODUCE HEAT?
That has to be one of the STUPIDEST posts ever.
Why don't you quote some respected scientists in any goddamn field who claims that CO2 produces heat.
Even the anti-science morons aren't that stupid.
So if CO2 doesn't trap additional heat, why is it called global warming?