Well, Crackers do have their own narrative which has nursed their grievances since they made the mistake of firing on an industrial superior out of misplaced arrogance. Pity about that.Because it was illegally occupied--AN ACT OF WAR!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well, Crackers do have their own narrative which has nursed their grievances since they made the mistake of firing on an industrial superior out of misplaced arrogance. Pity about that.Because it was illegally occupied--AN ACT OF WAR!!!
Because it has also been allowed to be used and branded as a symbol of hate and racism. Still is.So, why raise such a ridiculous fuss over it?Some folks will fight and try to rewrite our Civil War forever. Confederacy lost. Time will never change that. The confederate flag is a lost cause.
For the last 40+ years, it has mainly/generally been used as a symbol of The South. Even in pop culture and entertainment.
Agreed. I never thought of the Confederate flag as a symbol of slavery, and I’m not a southern. However blacks may see it as such, and in America today they have become a protected class. So, if they want it expunged so be it. I don’t give a shit.So, why raise such a ridiculous fuss over it?Some folks will fight and try to rewrite our Civil War forever. Confederacy lost. Time will never change that. The confederate flag is a lost cause.
For the last 40+ years, it has mainly/generally been used as a symbol of The South. Even in pop culture and entertainment.
Libs who burn the Confederate flag today will burn the US flag next
Wrong.You haven't asked a question that I can see, you've deflected from the issue with a load of meaningless crap.So you can't answer my question, GOT IT!
"Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
Nope. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, numskull. Lincoln committed the act of war, not South Carolina.Which was fired upon. An act of war.Yes, the federal government owned a piece of property in the State of South Carolina.
I concede that the South fired the first shot that led to the full blown warIt's almost as though treaties/agreements don't matter to Crackers when they become inconvenient..
In other words, "might makes right," eh, you Stalinist douchebag?Some folks will fight and try to rewrite our Civil War forever. Confederacy lost. Time will never change that. The confederate flag is a lost cause.
That's not a "narrative," the leftwing standard of proof. It's a fact.Well, Crackers do have their own narrative which has nursed their grievances since they made the mistake of firing on an industrial superior out of misplaced arrogance. Pity about that.Because it was illegally occupied--AN ACT OF WAR!!!
And have bern for several generationsThey already are.
They fired on trespassers who refused to leave. Lincoln also sent a resupply ship that passed through SC waters. Both are acts of war.I concede that the South fired the first shot that led to the full blown warIt's almost as though treaties/agreements don't matter to Crackers when they become inconvenient..
they fired on a federal fort in Charleston
but that does not change the fact that they had a right to leave the union
Actually RETARD the US Government is different then the State and while it may allow some state laws to be enforced reserves the right to make it that FEDERAL law applies to that property, go ahead and go to a US Base and READ the sign posted before you enter."Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
Why does our President support the racist, treasonous Confederate Flag?
We need monuments to Ho Chi MinhN
Not of "our past". Of the past. They lost.LOL go fly your rainbow flag you gay faggot. As for the Confederate flag it is NOT treasonous as it does not exists anymore and all the confederates were pardoned. It is simply a historical flag of our past. Remind me do you support BLM in tearing down Washington's statue, Lincoln? Remind me again who is the traitor?
We lost Vietnam ... can we still fly the American Flag?
But it was not very smartThey fired an trespassers who refused to leave. Lincoln also sent a resupply ship that passed through SC waters. Both are acts of war.
Actually RETARD the US Government is different then the State and while it may allow some state laws to be enforced reserves the right to make it that FEDERAL law applies to that property, go ahead and go to a US Base and READ the sign posted before you enter."Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
Actually RETARD the US Government is different then the State and while it may allow some state laws to be enforced reserves the right to make it that FEDERAL law applies to that property, go ahead and go to a US Base and READ the sign posted before you enter."Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
That 'property' was the state of South Carolina's; the fEds were allowed to use it. It reverted back to the state when it seceded, an act that was not illegal, and refusing to vacate it and then trying to use it to blockade the port was an act of war, by anybody's definition. Lincoln knew the response Buchanan got when he tried the same thing a few months earlier; Lincoln wanted to provoke a war and knew what the response to blockading the harbor would be.
Wrong, turd, the federal government cannot treat the property of Ft Sumter differnt than it can treat the property of any other state. The federal government cannot just nullify state laws.Actually RETARD the US Government is different then the State and while it may allow some state laws to be enforced reserves the right to make it that FEDERAL law applies to that property, go ahead and go to a US Base and READ the sign posted before you enter."Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
The carpetbaggers in this forum are always trying to obscure the difference between property and territory. Ft Sumter was federal property. It was not federal territory any more than Cape Canaveral, Yellowstone Park or Vandenburg airforce base are federal territory. They simply can't admit that Lincoln committed an act of war and thereby started the Civil War.Actually RETARD the US Government is different then the State and while it may allow some state laws to be enforced reserves the right to make it that FEDERAL law applies to that property, go ahead and go to a US Base and READ the sign posted before you enter."Title" means it's just a piece of property. Walmart is not a separate country. It's part of the state where I live. It has the same exact kind of "title" to the property it sits on as the federal government had with respect to Ft Sumter. It's part of South Carolina. Of course you will idiotically continue to post this already debunked claim because otherwise you will have to admit that the federal government made war on the State of South Carolina.Title had passed to the US government.It wasn't an act of war, nimrod. Ft Sumter was SC territory. Firing on your own territory is not an act of war, period.
That 'property' was the state of South Carolina's; the fEds were allowed to use it. It reverted back to the state when it seceded, an act that was not illegal, and refusing to vacate it and then trying to use it to blockade the port was an act of war, by anybody's definition. Lincoln knew the response Buchanan got when he tried the same thing a few months earlier; Lincoln wanted to provoke a war and knew what the response to blockading the harbor would be.