The First Amendment is useless.

[Dadoalex]

Most Conservatives and Classical Liberals are strong proponents of Free Speech. Most Progressives are proponents of Totalitarian Censorship of any idea they find offensive. They also support Draconian Punishment of anyone who expresses or hints at disagreeing with their views. Strangely, almost everyone supports the First Amendment. I do not.
...

Oh pity the poor "conservative." Unable to use the power of government to force their slime onto venues that do not want it because of that pesky First.

Oh how do you make it through the day knowing you'll not be able to tweet your latest download of lies and and bigger lies.

Personally, I revel in your pain.
Seriously.
I've watched you subhumans over the last 12 years scream "FIRST" every time a post got deleted or some such. I watched as your behaviors got worse and worse and these companies refused to honor their own ToS.
All that's happening here is these companies are enforcing the ToS
TO WHICH YOU AGREED!!!
I just LOOOOOOOVVVVVVE IRONY

"Oh pity the poor "conservative." Unable to use the power of government to force their slime onto venues that do not want it because of that pesky First."
Hilarious. That's exactly how a NAZI official in the German government of 1933 would have describe his position on censorship.

Their TOS are horseshit. They obviously aren't evenly enforced, asshole.

So, again, you demand the government enforce your rights to spew your crap wherever you want by denying their right not not have your filth contaminating their product.

You know what's funny? You don't even see the hypocrisy of your demand.

 

[bripat9643]

Most Conservatives and Classical Liberals are strong proponents of Free Speech. Most Progressives are proponents of Totalitarian Censorship of any idea they find offensive. They also support Draconian Punishment of anyone who expresses or hints at disagreeing with their views. Strangely, almost everyone supports the First Amendment. I do not.
...

Oh pity the poor "conservative." Unable to use the power of government to force their slime onto venues that do not want it because of that pesky First.

Oh how do you make it through the day knowing you'll not be able to tweet your latest download of lies and and bigger lies.

Personally, I revel in your pain.
Seriously.
I've watched you subhumans over the last 12 years scream "FIRST" every time a post got deleted or some such. I watched as your behaviors got worse and worse and these companies refused to honor their own ToS.
All that's happening here is these companies are enforcing the ToS
TO WHICH YOU AGREED!!!
I just LOOOOOOOVVVVVVE IRONY

"Oh pity the poor "conservative." Unable to use the power of government to force their slime onto venues that do not want it because of that pesky First."
Hilarious. That's exactly how a NAZI official in the German government of 1933 would have describe his position on censorship.

Their TOS are horseshit. They obviously aren't evenly enforced, asshole.

So, again, you demand the government enforce your rights to spew your crap wherever you want by denying their right not not have your filth contaminating their product.

You know what's funny? You don't even see the hypocrisy of your demand.

Your belief that your right to spew filth takes precedence over my right is hilarious.

There is no hypocrisy, NAZI. Facebook and Twitter are government protected monopolies. They have no right to censor their users.

 

[bripat9643]

Freedom of speech does not override the freedom of the press.

That is the press is not obligated to print the governments point of view or yours.

If Facebook constitutes "the press," then it can be sued.

 

[harmonica]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

 

[XponentialChaos]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Answer the question dmfk.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[harmonica]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Answer the question dmfk.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

already did --the one after your original response
and:-not only do you show your ignorance of the definitions of words and the Constitution, you also show immaturity/childishness/etc by your unnecessary insults

 

[mdk]

Statists are completely fine with violating business rights, property rights, and, association rights when it's politically convenient. These topics always expose those that pay lip service from those that actually give a squat about the aforementioned rights.

 

[Mac1958]

Statists are completely fine with violating business rights, property rights, and, association rights when it's politically convenient. These topics always expose those that pay lip service from those that actually give a squat about the aforementioned rights.

 

[mdk]

Statists are completely fine with violating business rights, property rights, and, association rights when it's politically convenient. These topics always expose those that pay lip service from those that actually give a squat about the aforementioned rights.

You can have your gay wedding cake and eat it too b/c hypocritically wiping your ass with your principles doesn't count when you're trying own the left/right.

 

[there4eyeM]

At most, "freedom of speech" only guarantees government can't imprison a person for expressing opinion.

 

[JoeB131]

Totalitarian Cancel Culture of 2020s is much worse then Political Correctness of the past decades. Tens or hundreds of thousands of people lose their jobs and careers for slightest offense against Progressives. Many of those who lose jobs are blacklisted. Even though many companies would like to hire these people, these companies are coerced by other businesses into not hiring them. Any company which falls out of line is boycotted by all other companies. Social Media censors speech which offends Progressives. When Parler was deplatformed by Amazon and Apple, almost every American company was afraid to work with Parler. The First Amendment did not prevent American Society from becoming Totalitarian. To a degree, the First Amendment Freedom of Association enables Totalitarianism.

Guy, there is no Cancel Culture.

There is CONSEQUENCE CULTURE.

And this is nothing new. Just ask Jane Fonda or the Dixie Chicks or Colin Kapernaeck.

Nor are hundreds of thousands losing their jobs over "offenses against progressives." Oh, people are fired for stupid shit they say on Social Media, such as saying, "My Job Sucks" after they Friended their boss.

 

[JoeB131]

Statists are completely fine with violating business rights, property rights, and, association rights when it's politically convenient. These topics always expose those that pay lip service from those that actually give a squat about the aforementioned rights.

 

[dblack]

Your belief that your right to spew filth takes precedence over my right is hilarious.

You're not intelligent enough to understand civil liberties. Please stop trying.

There is no hypocrisy, NAZI. Facebook and Twitter are government protected monopolies. They have no right to censor their users.

Statist mantra - b,b,but, monopoly!!! (though not really).

 

[BlindBoo]

Freedom of speech does not override the freedom of the press.

That is the press is not obligated to print the governments point of view or yours.

If Facebook constitutes "the press," then it can be sued.

They are being sued.

 

[dblack]

Freedom of speech does not override the freedom of the press.

That is the press is not obligated to print the governments point of view or yours.

If Facebook constitutes "the press," then it can be sued.

They are being sued.

He's whining about 230, 'cause he's got nothing else. They should just repeal it and let the courts set precedent (which would result in exactly the same policy). Of course they'd just find something else to whine about.

 

[bripat9643]

Statists are completely fine with violating business rights, property rights, and, association rights when it's politically convenient. These topics always expose those that pay lip service from those that actually give a squat about the aforementioned rights.

I call that the horseshit horseshoe.

 

[XponentialChaos]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Answer the question dmfk.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

already did --the one after your original response
and:-not only do you show your ignorance of the definitions of words and the Constitution, you also show immaturity/childishness/etc by your unnecessary insults

Congress didn’t pass a law to censor Gina Carano. Therefore not a violation of the first amendment.

 

[harmonica]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Answer the question dmfk.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

already did --the one after your original response
and:-not only do you show your ignorance of the definitions of words and the Constitution, you also show immaturity/childishness/etc by your unnecessary insults

Congress didn’t pass a law to censor Gina Carano. Therefore not a violation of the first amendment.

firing someone that tells the truth is what the nazis/etc did......plain and simple--and you SUPPORT that!!!!!!!!!!

 

[dblack]

firing someone that tells the truth is what the nazis/etc did......plain and simple--and you SUPPORT that!!!!!!!!!!

Oh, they did a lot worse than that. Have you read about the Holocaust?

 

[XponentialChaos]

.....Gina Carano is a perfect example--and she was telling the truth --NOT hate/etc

Not related to the first amendment.

hahahhaha
1. related to the OP--perfectly related
2. you can't refute it
3. yes, it is RELATED to the 1st Amendment = free speech--you fkd up!!
4. you support people getting punished for telling the truth/free speech = YOU are like the nazis

The first amendment is about the GOVERNMENT censoring you, moron.

It doesn’t say that there will be no consequences for your speech.

You seriously didn’t know that?

HHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAJAJAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA

NOW I see the problem--you don't know what the !st Amendment is !!!!
HAHAHAHHAAHAHA
'''''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'''''

..just like all of the Amendments--they can be interpreted many ways
..anyway, getting back to your original reply---it IS related
hahahhahaha--you fkd up

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I must have missed that law.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You fked up hahahahahahahahahaha

hhahahahhahahah
your brain is missing
..the other problem is, you people don't know the definitions of the words you posts !!!!! hahahahah

Definition of RELATED

connected by reason of an established or discoverable relation; connected by common ancestry or sometimes by marriage; having close harmonic connection —used of tones, chords, or tonalities… See the full definition

www.merriam-webster.com

Did Congress make a law to restrict the speech of Gina Carano?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Answer the question dmfk.


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

already did --the one after your original response
and:-not only do you show your ignorance of the definitions of words and the Constitution, you also show immaturity/childishness/etc by your unnecessary insults

Congress didn’t pass a law to censor Gina Carano. Therefore not a violation of the first amendment.

firing someone that tells the truth is what the nazis/etc did......plain and simple--and you SUPPORT that!!!!!!!!!!

Look at the wording of the first amendment that you posted. It’s not a violation of the first amendment.

The GOVERNMENT is not censoring her. It’s very SIMPLE!!!!!!!!