martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,953
- 44,230
- 2,300
Because you donāt want babies to starve
So we reward bad behavior?
When you spend money on something, you get more of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because you donāt want babies to starve
Well then how's about we drop the equivocation and you just tell us - what do you mean by "equity"? From your little meme picture, it sure seems like the goal is equal outcomes. But you're denying that. What do you have up your sleeve?Equity does not expect equal outcomes
Oh, don't be coy. You're looking for bit more than "advocacy", right? You want state policy forcing the matter, don't you?But is does advocate helping those who are struggling more than helping the millionaires
Not my concern, nor my responsibly.Because you donāt want babies to starve
So that would make you a selfish assholeNot my concern, nor my responsibly.
Nope. Thatās not the definition of equity. Leftists keep talking about equal OUTCOMES. That means someone who squeaked by high school and now works at Target should live as well as someone who sacrificed to go to college to develop high-value career skills.
Kamala Harris said we need equal outcomes - income, wealth, etc. You are changing the definition of equity.Show me ANYONE who proposes such a thing
What we do is help low wage employees at Target to support a family with housing, food and medical care
Allowing poor people to have healthcare just like rich people is Equity
Allowing poor people to have the same public school education as the wealthy isā¦ā¦Equity
My concern, and rightly so, are for me and my family. As it should be.So that would make you a selfish asshole
oh yesā¦.rightwinger
There is a poster on this forum who has bragged about having an MBA and refusing to get a job because he wanted to keep his income low so he could get all six of his kids on welfare.
So just how far do you think we should take this? Should an educated man with high earnings potential be able to get away with refusing to work and forcing other people to hand over some of their own earnings to support his kids, so he can just stay home?
So because you canāt defend that poster, you are now claiming I made it up? Typical response when a leftist canāt come up with an answer.oh yesā¦.
The old āI know a guyā story
Conservatives like to spread them around to support their claims that poor people are just lazy and donāt want to work
Helps support their efforts to block social programs for the poor
So because you canāt defend that poster, you are now claiming I made it up? Typical response when a leftist canāt come up with an answer.
The guy posts right on this message board!
I canāt look through all the posts to find it. But go ahead and call me a liar. itās what you leftists do.I canāt defend a post I have not read
Give me a name
Until you post a link, I will look at it as another āI know a guyā story being spread to try to convince people that poor people are all lazy and donāt deserve help
Show me ANYONE who proposes such a thing
What we do is help low wage employees at Target to support a family with housing, food and medical care
Allowing poor people to have healthcare just like rich people is Equity
Allowing poor people to have the same public school education as the wealthy isā¦ā¦Equity
Also, this wasnāt blaming a poor person. It was blaming an MBA who could have made a fortune if he were willing to take a job.I canāt defend a post I have not read
Give me a name
Until you post a link, I will look at it as another āI know a guyā story being spread to try to convince people that poor people are all lazy and donāt deserve help
Yup. Itās also driving small businesses out of business, which is what leftists want. The hostility for a motivated, competent, disciplined person who started and is running a business is off the charts. Leftists much prefer dependent people.When you are forcing businesses to pay people above what they add in value to a given product or service, you are proposing such a thing.
Yup. Itās also driving small businesses out of business, which is what leftists want. The hostility for a motivated, competent, disciplined person who started and is running a business is off the charts. Leftists much prefer dependent people.
āYou didnāt build that!ā
Yet you never seem to post stories about poor working Americans who have not seen significant pay raises in decades and a Minimum Wage that has been frozen for 13 yearsAlso, this wasnāt blaming a poor person. It was blaming an MBA who could have made a fortune if he were willing to take a job.
And I never said all poor people are lazy and donāt deserve help. But those who are capable of working and refuse tot get jobs do NOT deserve it. They have to be willing to make some effort as well.
It at all. Especially when the US Constitution does not give the Federal Government any power to be engaged in Education decisions.As it should be
You help those communities that need help
Small business has profited off of a frozen minimum wage for 13 years.Yup. Itās also driving small businesses out of business, which is what leftists want. The hostility for a motivated, competent, disciplined person who started and is running a business is off the charts. Leftists much prefer dependent people.
āYou didnāt build that!ā
Who said they are?It at all. Especially when the US Constitution does not give the Federal Government any power to be engaged in Education decisions.