The disorienting nature of gaslighting.

Indictments are meaningless. There is no proof that Trump did anything illegal. There is proof of lawfare on the Biden's regime's part. Biased prosecutors, biased judges that take fake evidence and indict.

Just one case in point; Trump gets a loan, he pays it back. The bank is happy. Biased prosecutors try to claim Trump's property was over valued and used tax assessment as 'proof.' Anyone vaguely familiar with property appraisal for loan purposes would NEVER use assessed value as their opinion of value.

They tried to prosecute Trump for overvaluing his property but, anyone can tell a bank what they 'think' their property is worth, it's not illegal. It's up to the bank to do their due diligence before making the loan which most often requires not only an unbiased opinion of value but, researching the borrower's ability to pay. Trump's loan was paid back in full.

Yet here you are in your glittering ignorance pretending you know Trump is somehow guilty. You're an ignorant loon.
So Trump was indicted and your defense is that he was never convicted and that indictments don’t mean anything

What you pretend to ignore is the fact that his election as President negated the possibility of his being tried
 
That's not rebuttal. It has all the intellectual weight of a 6 year old saying, "No, you."
No You? I'm amazed that you were able to condense it down to two words. Your normal cut and paste is much wordier than that and says the same garbage. Wash, rinse, repeat.
 
So Trump was indicted and your defense is that he was never convicted and that indictments don’t mean anything

What you pretend to ignore is the fact that his election as President negated the possibility of his being tried
I looked at the so-called evidence, and there is none, whether or not he’s president.
 
So Trump was indicted and your defense is that he was never convicted and that indictments don’t mean anything

What you pretend to ignore is the fact that his election as President negated the possibility of his being tried
People who claim the indictments are meaningless, besides massively being in denial, have never read the indictment filings. The evidence of his guilt is overwhelming.
 

Susie Wiles is Trump’s perfect enabler-in-chief​

White House chief of staff Susie Wiles broke the mold when she signed onto the hugely influential job. The first woman to hold the role, she’s also skillfully avoided making headlines during the first year of President Donald Trump’s second term. But that all changed with a pair of bombshell articles published Tuesday from Vanity Fair that shoved the reticent backstage player directly into the spotlight.

It’s true that Wiles has tamped down on the conniving and backbiting that characterized Trump’s first turn in the White House. She may even outlast the longest of the four(ish) chiefs that held the job during those years. But based on what she revealed over the course of her 11 on-the-record interviews with author Chris Whipple, her job survival depends on being exactly the enabler-in-chief that Trump has needed at his side.

Wiles herself disagrees with that moniker, but by her own admission, she hasn’t had any major confrontations with the president over weighty topics such as constitutional rights or a policy’s cost in human lives. (After the Vanity Fair articles were published, she denounced them in a statement as “a disingenuously framed hit piece on me and the finest president, White House staff and Cabinet in history.”)


Okay, so she's just as delusional as the rest of them. But how do they maintain the delusion in the face of reality?
 

"What you're seeing and what you're reading is not what's happening." ―The Liar-in-Chief, 2018

Yes it is. What you're seeing is exactly what happened despite the regime's lies.
 
AI Overview

As of early 2026, the U.S. Postal Service is implementing "Delivering for America" plan changes, which include processing-based postmarking that can delay official timestamps by a day or more, potentially impacting mail-in ballots and time-sensitive documents. While this, alongside infrastructure changes, increases delays, the USPS maintains it has not changed its official postmarking practices,, and the changes are aimed at modernization rather than specifically being a direct order from the Trump administration to slow mail.

I'm sure this has nothing to do with trump's hatred of mail-in ballots and his efforts to rig the upcoming election. ;)
 
AI Overview

As of early 2026, the U.S. Postal Service is implementing "Delivering for America" plan changes, which include processing-based postmarking that can delay official timestamps by a day or more, potentially impacting mail-in ballots and time-sensitive documents. While this, alongside infrastructure changes, increases delays, the USPS maintains it has not changed its official postmarking practices,, and the changes are aimed at modernization rather than specifically being a direct order from the Trump administration to slow mail.

I'm sure this has nothing to do with trump's hatred of mail-in ballots and his efforts to rig the upcoming election. ;)
Gee, you get the ballot a couple weeks before election day. Voting can't be too important to YOU if you can't drop it in the mail at least a week beforehand. SMFH. Does someone hold your hand when you piss too?
 

Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms​

President Donald Trump on Friday said he will issue an executive order “shortly” laying out the “legal reasons” for national voter-identification requirements.

Trump, in posts late Friday to Truth Social, said he wants voter-ID laws implemented for the 2026 midterm elections, even though legislation mandating them appears poised to stall in Congress.

“The Democrats refuse to vote for Voter I.D., or Citizenship. The reason is very simple — They want to continue to cheat in Elections,” Trump posted to Truth Social.


Trump says he will issue executive order to get voter-ID requirements before midterms

President Donald Trump proclaims that he will find a way to implement national voter-ID requirements by November's elections.
www.cnbc.com
www.cnbc.com

I think even trump fans recognize this is gaslighting. Cuz, you know, not only did Dotard try to steal the 2020 election, not only is he trying to rig the 2026 elections in favor of R's, BUT THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT THE US HAS A VOTER FRAUD PROBLEM. What we do have is a prez who is a FRAUD.
 
15th post
White House economic advisor Kevin Hassett said Wednesday that the authors of a recent New York Federal Reserve paper that found U.S. companies and consumers are shouldering most of the tariff burden should be “disciplined.”

In a CNBC interview, the National Economic Council director ripped the report, saying that central bank researchers ignored key aspects of how the duties worked and instead simply focused on prices. Hassett said the research also should have included the upward impact on wages and benefits that U.S. companies see by bringing more production onshore.


The regime doesn't like what the report said. That doesn't make it wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom