The disorienting nature of gaslighting.

On Sunday, Hassett cast similar doubt on the accuracy of the jobs numbers, pointing to past revisions that were made to jobs reports after then-President Joe Biden stopped running for re-election last year.

“There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder. And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it’s the president’s highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable,” Hassett told “Meet the Press” moderator Kristen Welker.


There is plenty of info available explaining why the data is revised all the time. Part of the reason it happened recently could very well be the budget cuts at the BLS leading to expert employees being fired. trump, as an inveterate liar, isn't the least bit interested in accurate data. He's interested in data that makes him look good.

‘Survival mode’: Concerns over economic data quality mount amid cuts​

Bassett had the nerve to say the numbers would be more reliable with a trump appointed person running the BLS. He said it with a straight face. Hilarious.
 
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
So you can’t even keep up with your left wing bullshit.
 
FBI agents on Thursday morning raided the Maryland home of John Bolton, the former national security advisor to President Donald Trump and a staunch critic of the president, NBC News confirmed.

The raid is part of a “national security investigation in search of classified records,” a person familiar with the matter told NBC News.

An FBI official said, “The FBI is conducting court authorized activity in the area. There is no threat to public safety,” but declined to comment on Bolton, according to NBC.

FBI Director Kash Patel tweeted “NO ONE is above the law… @FBI agents on mission” at around 7 a.m. ET, the same time his agents reportedly arrived at Bolton’s residence in Bethesda, near Washington, D.C.

Attorney General Pam Bondi retweeted Patel’s tweet, writing, “America’s safety isn’t negotiable. Justice will be pursued. Always.”


Anyone who thinks it's a coincidence that a raid similar to the one the FBI conducted on MAL after trump refused to comply with a subpoena for the return of classified docs was carried out on Bolton's home..........A VOCAL CRITIC OF tRUMP.........isn't paying attention.
 
The debate over who controls programming at the Smithsonian had intensified on Aug. 12 when White House officials announced in a public letter to Mr. Bunch that it would begin a comprehensive look at current and planned exhibitions, wall text and social media to assess “tone, historical framing and alignment with American ideals.”

The White House had said in its letter that the purpose of its review was to replace “divisive or ideologically driven language with unifying, historically accurate and constructive descriptions.” The Smithsonian was given 120 days to “begin implementing content corrections” requested by the administration.


Unifying, hmmm. The word casts an uneasy, Orwellian pall over the endeavor. As if the regime wants the museum's visitors go there to be indoctrinated, not informed. "Historically accurate and constructive descriptions" of slavery's telling sounds like an oxymoron to me. But then I never considered putting a happy face on subjugation, lynching, being whipped, and the centuries long project of stripping people of their dignity.
 
“I asked earlier about Fallon and Seth Meyers, but is the president’s view that they should also be taken off the air, shared by the FCC?” Quintanilla asked.

Carr replied, “I don’t speak for the president.”

“Our goal and our obligation here is to make sure that broadcasters are serving the public interest,” Carr said.


:laughing0301: Nobody believes that. You think your obligation is to do what Don tells you to do, the public interest be damned. It's why he put you in the position. In this case, threaten ABC with severe punishment to send a message, criticism of Dear Leader will not be tolerated.
 
Last edited:
So you can’t even keep up with your left wing bullshit.

A grand jury has indicted a longtime Trump target, the former F.B.I. director James Comey.

The F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi, the attorney general, appeared to post about the indictment without mentioning James Comey by name. Patel said on social media that “for far too long, previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement.”

The investigation into Comey has centered on whether he misled lawmakers during testimony about the F.B.I.'s investigation of President Trump’s 2016 campaign’s ties to Russia. Many current and former Justice Department officials say the indictment was based on weak evidence.

Bondi said on social media that “today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people.”


Why doesn't that include the orange piece of shit?
 

A grand jury has indicted a longtime Trump target, the former F.B.I. director James Comey.

The F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, and Pam Bondi, the attorney general, appeared to post about the indictment without mentioning James Comey by name. Patel said on social media that “for far too long, previous corrupt leadership and their enablers weaponized federal law enforcement.”

The investigation into Comey has centered on whether he misled lawmakers during testimony about the F.B.I.'s investigation of President Trump’s 2016 campaign’s ties to Russia. Many current and former Justice Department officials say the indictment was based on weak evidence.

Bondi said on social media that “today’s indictment reflects this Department of Justice’s commitment to holding those who abuse positions of power accountable for misleading the American people.”


Why doesn't that include the orange piece of shit?
Because he was the victim of this Russia Russia Russia hoax you ******* retard.
 
Because he was the victim of this Russia Russia Russia hoax you ******* retard.
Actually, he wasn't. The crimes of obstruction he committed during Mueller's investigation were never charged because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez. Billy the Bagman completely mischaracterized Mueller's report to the public before its official release. The Crossfire Hurricane investigation by the FBI was kept secret until after the election in 2016.

So.......two things. How was he harmed and what justifies the bullshit indictment of Comey?

James Comey wants 'vindictive' case dropped and Trump's prosecutor disqualified​

 
Actually, he wasn't. The crimes of obstruction he committed during Mueller's investigation were never charged because of the OLC prohibition against indicting a sitting prez. Billy the Bagman completely mischaracterized Mueller's report to the public before its official release. The Crossfire Hurricane investigation by the FBI was kept secret until after the election in 2016.

So.......two things. How was he harmed and what justifies the bullshit indictment of Comey?

James Comey wants 'vindictive' case dropped and Trump's prosecutor disqualified​

Didn't stop corrupt NY judges and prosecutors from changing the laws to get the prosecutions they were looking for. Hmmm. Strawman.
 
Didn't stop corrupt NY judges and prosecutors from changing the laws to get the prosecutions they were looking for. Hmmm. Strawman.
They didn't change the law. As a matter of fact other individuals were tried and convicted for committing the same financial crimes trump committed.

Will Trump Get Jail Time? We Looked at Similar Cases to Find Out.​

In November, after voters decide whether to return Donald J. Trump to the White House, the judge who oversaw his criminal trial could send him to jail.

And despite Mr. Trump’s political status, the judge has ample grounds to do so, a New York Times examination of dozens of similar cases shows.

The former president’s unruly behavior at the New York trial makes him a candidate for jail time, as does his felony crime of falsifying business records: Over the past decade in Manhattan, more than a third of these convictions resulted in defendants spending time behind bars, The Times’s examination found. Across New York State, the proportion is even higher — about 42 percent of those convictions led to jail or prison time.

 
Republican state senators in North Carolina approved a new congressional map on Tuesday to further favor their party and help the Trump administration’s efforts to retain control of the U.S. House in the midterm elections next year.

The new map would likely give Republicans an extra House seat. The State Senate approved it just over a week after Phil Berger, the chamber’s leader, and Destin Hall, the speaker of the State House of Representatives, said in a joint statement that they were taking action to protect President Trump’s agenda and safeguard Republican control of Congress.


"Protecting Dotard's agenda" in real terms means cheating in order to essentially disenfranchise some voters in NC living in the affected districts.
 
Republican state senators in North Carolina approved a new congressional map on Tuesday to further favor their party and help the Trump administration’s efforts to retain control of the U.S. House in the midterm elections next year.
Gee, Trump is using the same tactics that democrats on the left coast and New England have been using for decades and now you're butt hurt about it. You morons don't like it when YOUR policies are used against you. Too bad. Three years, two and half months more of it. Keep using the same ignorant tactics and it may be another eight years beyond that.
 
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.

It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.​

House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.

Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.

House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”

But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.

“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”


I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.

Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.

Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits​

The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.

Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda​


Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
Another Marxist blaming others for the shitty stuff they themselves are doing. ^^^^
 
15th post
Another Marxist blaming others for the shitty stuff they themselves are doing. ^^^^
Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.

GFY.
 
Oh? Please link to the conviction. Those not convicted are---say it with me----INNOCENT.
Only people who have not read the indictments against Dotard still believe he's innocent.

Putin will never face charges of war crimes in the Hague. Does that make him innocent?
 
Back
Top Bottom