whitehall
Diamond Member
The freaking democrat party is falling apart and the post is about the GOP's perception of federal judges. It's a perfect example of gaslighting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.The freaking democrat party is falling apart and the post is about the GOP's perception of federal judges. It's a perfect example of gaslighting.
Keep in mind Berg, whatever underhanded tactics y'all employ set precedents. You'll hate these tactics when their used against you.House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.
That's called aiding and abetting authoritarian governance. The courts are playing their constitutional role as a check on abuses of power and illegal actions on the part of the regime. Trying to remove the obstacle the courts present rather than complying with the law is what despots do.
Funny, I was just thinking about how Repubs will have to keep their mouths shut no matter what the next Dem prez does. Including enriching himself unethically/illegally, breaking multiple laws, defying the courts, purging the government of perceived enemies, appointing an incompetent cabinet, inveterate lying, intimidating law firms and the media..............getting the picture?Keep in mind Berg, whatever underhanded tactics y'all employ set precedents. You'll hate these tactics when their used against you.
Now, that's a special kind of eternal butt hurt right there....Funny, I was just thinking about how Repubs will have to keep their mouths shut no matter what the next Dem prez does. Including enriching himself unethically/illegally, breaking multiple laws, defying the courts, purging the government of perceived enemies, appointing an incompetent cabinet, inveterate lying, intimidating law firms and the media..............getting the picture?
Well saidGaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.
House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.
Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.
House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”
But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.
“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”
I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.
Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.
Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits
The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.
![]()
Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits
The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.www.nytimes.com
Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.
Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda
![]()
Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda
Plus, a list of key ongoing and upcoming court cases and a very special new podcast in this week’s 3-Minute Read from Jen Psaki.www.msnbc.com
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
In this country impeachment is always a term late.You are clearly disoriented after sucking off the Democrat gas pipe for so long.
OK Let's take a look at how great the US economy is.... FACTS NOT guesses OK??I heard the Felon-in-Chief on the radio today speaking in the ME. He was touting the US economy, saying it's the greatest. You know.......even though we had negative GDP for Q1. Was he lying, delusional, or both?
The post is an example of "gaslighting"House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.
That's called aiding and abetting authoritarian governance. The courts are playing their constitutional role as a check on abuses of power and illegal actions on the part of the regime. Trying to remove the obstacle the courts present rather than complying with the law is what despots do.
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
An odd, vague statement at best. Feel free to clearly state what you are trying to say.In this country impeachment is always a term late.
If there was a god trump would have been stillborn.LOL. Anyone calling the Trump Administration a “regime” ans fighting to keep criminal aliens in this country to do more harm to citizens is beyond help.
Guess what? Trump will be president for another 3 years and 10 months, Gd-willing.
“There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them,” Martin said. “And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that’s a fact. That’s the way things work. And so that’s, that’s how I believe the job operates.”
Its easily handled by a big, beautiful Trump EO saying District Courts have no say in how the Executive Office is run, it’s solely up to POTUSGaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
It’s not just impeachments. Republicans are eyeing other ways to rein in federal judges.
House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.
Top Republicans are likely to put at least one bill, California Rep. Darrell Issa’s “No Rogue Rulings Act,” on the floor in early April, according to two people granted anonymity to discuss scheduling plans. The legislation would crack down on the ability of lower-court judges to issue far-reaching injunctions.
House Republicans have filed impeachment resolutions targeting four district judges, including one this week targeting the jurist who sought to block Trump’s effort to deport alleged gang members to El Salvador. Trump publicly backed the impeachment push, and Musk quickly fanned the flames on X, his social-media platform, calling the deportations ruling part of a “judicial coup.”
But there is widespread recognition inside the House GOP that impeachments — besides being costly in time and political capital — do not have the votes to succeed given Republicans’ narrow majority. That has prompted GOP hard-liners to back-channel with Trump allies on alternatives they could push across the House floor.
“Activist judges, particularly in D.C., think that they are the Trump resistance — the Trump political resistance,” said Mike Davis, a close Trump ally who runs an outside judicial advocacy group. “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.”
I've pointed out a number of times how effective the Right has been in creating specious, counter factual narratives to address political vulnerabilities. Karl Rove was expert at it. Bush had a weakness relative to John Kerry over their respective service in the military. Kerry went to war in Vietnam, George stayed home and pretended to be a pilot in the ANG. So Kerry got swift boated, problem solved. trump's epic corruption and law breaking leading up to the 2024 election needed obfuscation. So the Right fabricated a fiction that he was the victim of persecution.
Darrel Issa, in Orwellian fashion, has introduced a bill named the "No Rogue Rulings Act" to deal with judges making rulings on rogue EO's and directives coming from the regime. How very diabolically clever. Some trump ally said of judges, “What they are doing is lawless and dangerous, and it must be stopped.” I can hardly think of a better way to describe what trump and Co have been attempting. Joe Biden was accused of weaponizing the DoJ because it tried to respond to trump's lawlessness. A preemptive strike to provide cover for trump turning Pam Bondi in to his personal attack dog and protector.
Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits
The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.
![]()
Justice Dept. Tries to Intervene on Trump’s Behalf in Jan. 6 Lawsuits
The department employed a maneuver that could protect the president from legal and financial consequences in a series of civil suits.www.nytimes.com
Every utterance coming from the regime requires independent, critical thought. Because the construct it's trying to create doesn't match objective reality. Is a policy induced slowdown in the economy and the resultant decline in the stock market a "healthy correction?" In trumpworld it is. Are rulings blocking the regime's unconstitutional actions coming from "activist judges?" Or is it necessary to discredit the rulings in order to manipulate the public's perception of what is happening.
Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda
![]()
Even GOP-appointed judges are resisting Trump's agenda
Plus, a list of key ongoing and upcoming court cases and a very special new podcast in this week’s 3-Minute Read from Jen Psaki.www.msnbc.com
Gaslighting is defined as the manipulation of someone into questioning their own perception of reality.
Why why why would you pick out judges by party?The far-left activist judges need to be reigned in.
In what world is it normal for a judge to try to stop the deportation of criminal aliens and return the flights of violent thugs back to America?
There IS a Gd, which is why he saved him from the assassin’s bullet. That was way too close to be a coincidence.If there was a god trump would have been stillborn.
Exactly. Why is some locally elected district judge getting to overturn the will of the people by blocking the United States president from doing the work he was hired to do?Its easily handled by a big, beautiful Trump EO saying District Courts have no say in how the Executive Office is run, it’s solely up to POTUS
There is a case to be made that Trump was a God send to save America.If there was a god trump would have been stillborn.
.There is a case to be made that Trump was a God send to save America.
Maybe they’ll just pack the court, wasn’t that y’all’s idea?House Republicans don’t have the votes to impeach any federal judges. But a growing number of hard-liners is discussing several other legislative options as GOP leaders search for a release valve for the MAGA fury building over recent court rulings checking President Donald Trump.
That's called aiding and abetting authoritarian governance. The courts are playing their constitutional role as a check on abuses of power and illegal actions on the part of the regime. Trying to remove the obstacle the courts present rather than complying with the law is what despots do.
Well the president still has to act within the law…with that said, what the scotus has said is that these district judges can’t block things fir the entire country and they also harshly made clear that judge shopping won’t be toleratedExactly. Why is some locally elected district judge getting to overturn the will of the people by blocking the United States president from doing the work he was hired to do?