The Did Obama Commit Treason Thread and Poll

Did Obama Commit Treason?

  • No

    Votes: 27 32.1%
  • Yes

    Votes: 42 50.0%
  • No, he wasn't even born in America, so he can't be charged

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • No, you MAGAs are so desperate to deflect from the Trump Epstein Love Fest.

    Votes: 14 16.7%
  • No, Trump Presidential Immunity Rule Applies

    Votes: 6 7.1%
  • No, what's wrong with using US Intel Agencies as an extension of a political party anyway?

    Votes: 2 2.4%
  • Yes, starting with hiding his Kenyan birth. Oh, that makes Dubya a co-conspirator as well

    Votes: 5 6.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 3.6%
  • I think I was more useful to humanity during my 2 week timeout from here

    Votes: 6 7.1%

  • Total voters
    84
It all started with an NSA intercept of Russian communications.

The NSA intercepted calls between Michael Flynn and the Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak, in late 2016 and early 2017, revealing discussions about sanctions. These conversations contradicted Flynn's statements to the FBI and Vice President Pence, who were told that sanctions were not discussed. The transcripts of these calls were later declassified and released, showing Flynn urging Kislyak to moderate Russia's response to the sanctions.
That would be the James Clapper NSA, Postman? The very same James Clapper that had just been told by Barack Obama to ignore what his own intelligence officers told him (that there was zero evidence of collusion) and concoct a narrative of collusion to steal an election between the Trump campaign and the Russian government? The NSA wasn't "intercepting" calls between Flynn and Kislyak...they had tapped Flynn's phone through a FISA warrant based on the Steele dossiers. What they got Flynn on was lying to Federal agents, not collusion. The Comey FBI brought him in for questioning knowing that he wouldn't admit to contacting Kislyak before Trump was sworn in because that would be a violation of the Logan Act....something that hadn't been used against anyone since the Civil War because most incoming administrations start back channel communications with other countries before they're sworn in. Want to take a crack at telling me how telling the Russians that the Trump Administration would like them to moderate their response to sanctions equates to election interference?
 
That’s how a President can be removed from office.

But it was never a license to commit crimes free from eventual judicial scrutiny.

All SCOTUS has finally said is that if the allegedly criminal behavior comes within the ambit of his duties and authority under the Constitution, he has immunity. If it doesn’t, then he isn’t immune from eventual prosecution.
That is true, but a President, backed up by SCOTUS, has a special layer of protection and that protection is that the only authority given power to prosecute or discipline a President is Congress. And SCOTUS made it clear that protection continues once the President leaves office. If it was not so, every President that is disagreed with or hated would be in court for the rest of his/her natural life.

Our best defense against illegal acts by a President of the United States is to elect people who won't commit them.
 
That is true, but a President, backed up by SCOTUS, has a special layer of protection and that protection is that the only authority given power to prosecute or discipline a President is Congress. And SCOTUS made it clear that protection continues once the President leaves office. If it was not so, every President that is disagreed with or hated would be in court for the rest of his/her natural life.
You mean like what the Democrats did to Trump?
 
That would be the James Clapper NSA, Postman? The very same James Clapper that had just been told by Barack Obama to ignore what his own intelligence officers told him (that there was zero evidence of collusion) and concoct a narrative of collusion to steal an election between the Trump campaign and the Russian government? The NSA wasn't "intercepting" calls between Flynn and Kislyak...they had tapped Flynn's phone through a FISA warrant based on the Steele dossiers. What they got Flynn on was lying to Federal agents, not collusion. The Comey FBI brought him in for questioning knowing that he wouldn't admit to contacting Kislyak before Trump was sworn in because that would be a violation of the Logan Act....something that hadn't been used against anyone since the Civil War because most incoming administrations start back channel communications with other countries before they're sworn in. Want to take a crack at telling me how telling the Russians that the Trump Administration would like them to moderate their response to sanctions equates to election interference?
The Logan Act, an 18th Century law, has never been used successfully against anybody ever. Even the one or two who have been charged with it back in the 19th Century were never prosecuted.

to resurrect it to indict Trump was an act of pure desperation to get him for SOMETHING by corrupt Democrats.
 
They’re emotional about Obama asking officials to aggressively pursue suspicions that Russia tried to influence the election, but don’t care that Trump called a Governor strongly suggesting they “find him 13000 votes”. I’m all for prosecuting crimes, but I can’t stand disingenuously emotional partisanship. Either a crime is a crime or it’s not. Either you don’t like treason or you do. Stop straddling the line
 
It was what the Democrats were doing to Trump that inspired the SCOTUS ruling that stopped at least some of it.
The Democrats are still using lawfare. It's their "go to" response these days whenever it looks like Trump is doing something that will make things better for the American people!
 
They’re emotional about Obama asking officials to aggressively pursue suspicions that Russia tried to influence the election, but don’t care that Trump called a Governor strongly suggesting they “find him 13000 votes”. I’m all for prosecuting crimes, but I can’t stand disingenuously emotional partisanship. Either a crime is a crime or it’s not. Either you don’t like treason or you do. Stop straddling the line
Obama told Brennan and Clapper to ignore all of their analyst's reports that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government and provide reports that said the opposite! I'm not sure if that is criminal but it sure as hell is as sleazy as it gets! It was because of THAT request that the country has had to deal with almost nine years of partisan investigations into what is essentially a nothing burger! All because Barry couldn't deal with his hand picked successor losing to Trump!

Trump asking the Governor of Georgia to find 13000 votes isn't a crime, Zafira. Sorry but it's not. He didn't ask the Governor to provide fake ballots. It was a request to do recounts on the ballots that were out there.
 
The Democrats are still using lawfare. It's their "go to" response these days whenever it looks like Trump is doing something that will make things better for the American people!
That's what all these ridiculous court rulings are. Nothing but lawfare. But you're right. It's all TDS inspired and they don't care who gets hurt when they implement it.
 
Obama told Brennan and Clapper to ignore all of their analyst's reports that there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government and provide reports that said the opposite! I'm not sure if that is criminal but it sure as hell is as sleazy as it gets! It was because of THAT request that the country has had to deal with almost nine years of partisan investigations into what is essentially a nothing burger! All because Barry couldn't deal with his hand picked successor losing to Trump!

Trump asking the Governor of Georgia to find 13000 votes isn't a crime, Zafira. Sorry but it's not. He didn't ask the Governor to provide fake ballots. It was a request to do recounts on the ballots that were out there.
Exactly. It was a perfectly honorable and reasonable REQUEST for a recount--not a demand, not a threat, not an order--and any of us might have included with it, "I need you to find 3,000 votes" meaning "If you find 3,000 votes we can right this ship. . ."

A dishonest media is now notorious in this country for taking things like that out of their full context and making them into something they are not. And the gullible and/or dishonorable left just eats that up.
 
They’re emotional about Obama asking officials to aggressively pursue suspicions that Russia tried to influence the election, but don’t care that Trump called a Governor strongly suggesting they “find him 13000 votes”. I’m all for prosecuting crimes, but I can’t stand disingenuously emotional partisanship. Either a crime is a crime or it’s not. Either you don’t like treason or you do. Stop straddling the line
He didn't ask them to conjure up votes, like they did for OBiden, but to find what went missing after everything supposedly shut down for leaky bathroom pipes and such at 3 am.
On the other hand, we are just looking at the tip of the iceberg as far as the shit Obama and Clinton pulled. And the witnesses aren't willing to go down with that ship. They will be singing like canaries, for posterity's sake, because 100 years from now, they will still be writing books about the sheer magnitude of corruption in our White House.
Wait until Pizzagate is exposed. The vile depravity of it is going to be stomach churning...
 
Exactly. It was a perfectly honorable and reasonable REQUEST for a recount--not a demand, not a threat, not an order--and any of us might have included with it, "I need you to find 3,000 votes" meaning "If you find 3,000 votes we can right this ship. . ."

A dishonest media is now notorious in this country for taking things like that out of their full context and making them into something they are not. And the gullible and/or dishonorable left just eats that up.
If asking for a recount is a crime then Democrats like Al Gore and Stacey Abrams would have done prison time. It was always something that bordered on farce.
 
If asking for a recount is a crime then Democrats like Al Gore and Stacey Abrams would have done prison time. It was always something that bordered on farce.
Very true. As would Hillary Clinton and Jill Stein.

"WashingtonCNN —11/28/2016
Hillary Clinton’s campaign said Saturday it will take part in efforts to push for recounts in several key states, joining with Green Party candidate Jill Stein, who has raised millions of dollars to have votes counted again in Wisconsin. . ."


And Hillary was quite certain the 2016 election was stolen from her and she, Pelosi and others spent four years calling Trump 45 an 'illegitimate President."


Of course Youtube and Google et al, all controlled by 'woke' Democrats, have removed or deeply buried all the video of those two saying that as well as all the Democrats stating the 2016 election was hacked.


But the few honorable search engines out there can still find them :)

 
Last edited:
He didn't ask them to conjure up votes, like they did for OBiden, but to find what went missing after everything supposedly shut down for leaky bathroom pipes and such at 3 am.
On the other hand, we are just looking at the tip of the iceberg as far as the shit Obama and Clinton pulled. And the witnesses aren't willing to go down with that ship. They will be singing like canaries, for posterity's sake, because 100 years from now, they will still be writing books about the sheer magnitude of corruption in our White House.
Wait until Pizzagate is exposed. The vile depravity of it is going to be stomach churning...
Sure and Trump pressured Georgia’s Republican secretary of state to “find” him enough votes to overturn the presidential election and vaguely threatened him with a criminal offense.

Pizzagate :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:


1753824620067.webp
 
15th post
The entire conspiracy to misuse the power of government to get a political opponent via persecution

How does intelligence finding that Russians conducted illicit electioneering for the benefit of Trump "get political opponent via persecution"?

Actual criminal investigation opened when campaign member Papadapolous lied to investigators about Russians having Clinton emails. Thats not Obama doing something, thats campaign acting conspicuous, rasing reasonable suspicion, warranting an investigation.
 
Last edited:
Sure and Trump pressured Georgia’s Republican secretary of state to “find” him enough votes to overturn the presidential election and vaguely threatened him with a criminal offense.

Pizzagate :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:


View attachment 1142526
Show your evidence from a credible verifiable source or you're making that up as malicious propaganda.
 
How does intelligence finding that Russians conducted illicit electioneering for the benefit of Trump "get political opponent via persecution"?

Actual criminal investigation opened when campaign member Papadapolous lied to investigators about Russians having Clinton emails. Thats not Obama doing something, thats campaign acting conspicuous, rasing reasonable suspicion, warranting an investigation.
Simple question, Anton. Did Barack Obama ask Brennan and Clapper to ignore their own analysts who said that they had found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian Government and provide reports that said that they HAD found evidence of collusion? Because I'm sorry but that IS Obama doing something and what he did was way beyond the pale!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom