The Delusional Socialist Democrats do not want the Electoral College

[edthecynic]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

No.

because you are ignorant

if we didn't have the electoral college presidential candidates would only need to campaign and pander to half a dozen largest cities to win an election

the needs of the citizens that live in less populated rural areas can be ignored

As opposed to campaigning in a few "battleground" states now.

 

[edthecynic]

The Democrats are admitting that they hate white voters

That is nothing more than a Russia Limbaugh LIE mindlessly parroted by DittoTard idiots.

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Anyone that spews the Republican Party hate non-white voters is a partisan nutter for the Democrats...

Denocrats do not hate white voters either... Sure Omar, Talib and Cortez might but Pelosi does not hate white voters...

 

[edthecynic]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

No.

Lol
In a pure popular vote, Small states might as will not even vote… Because they would lose every single election. You ******* retard

No in a pure popular vote every persons vote will count equally, so you would have to be pretty STUPID not to vote, but with the EC some states votes count more than others.

 

[Wry Catcher]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

Small states have more power than large states when one looks at the Senate. 40 million California's have only two Senators; Alabama has less than 5 million and has two senators. How is that fair?

 

[JustAGuy1]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

Small states have more power than large states when one looks at the Senate. 40 million California's have only two Senators; Alabama has less than 5 million and has two senators. How is that fair?

Fair? Are you a child?
You sure don't have a working knowledge of the Constitution and why it was set up the way it was.

"Fair"? Like all Progs you want to choose your own definition as to what any given word means so that you can spin and twist it to get what you want. The Founders were not omniscient but they were prescient.

"Fair" to children like you is rigging the system in your favor.
Hell the EC is "unfair" and the 3/5th's clause was racist, your ignorance is astonishing.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Democrats don't want the vote at all. They want an announcement of Everybody Knows.

 

[edthecynic]

Democrats don't want the vote at all. They want an announcement of Everybody Knows.

BULLSHIT!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

No.

Lol
In a pure popular vote, Small states might as will not even vote… Because they would lose every single election. You ******* retard

No in a pure popular vote every persons vote will count equally, so you would have to be pretty STUPID not to vote, but with the EC some states votes count more than others.

This is the heart of the matter, with the EC, states are what matter. Get rid of the EC and states no longer matter, just numbers.

The problem is that our founding fathers wanted the states to matter

 

[Wry Catcher]

Trump won the popular vote in 49 states by 1 million votes

LIAR ^^^

Trump v. Clinton: What the popular vote in each state shows

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump won the popular vote in 49 states by 1 million votes

LIAR ^^^

Trump v. Clinton: What the popular vote in each state shows

Do you expect us to believe CBS?

 

[Wry Catcher]

Trump won the popular vote in 49 states by 1 million votes

LIAR ^^^

Trump v. Clinton: What the popular vote in each state shows

Do you expect us to believe CBS?

Not you. You've proved over and over only Hannity, Limbaugh, Dobbs and other talking heads on FOX, Trump & his Press Secretary, lap dogs VP Pence, Sen Graham and other ne'er-do-wells on the Internet have told you what to believe.

 

[Agit8r]

The most practicable idea would be to divide the electoral votes evenly according to population, rather than according to congressional representation.

 

[Rustic]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

No.

Lol
In a pure popular vote, Small states might as will not even vote… Because they would lose every single election. You ******* retard

No in a pure popular vote every persons vote will count equally, so you would have to be pretty STUPID not to vote, but with the EC some states votes count more than others.

Lol
Like I said, in a pure popular vote small population states might as will not even vote because they would lose every single presidential election... fact
They don’t have enough numbers to matter at all anywhere in the process.

So Shut the **** up

 

[Rustic]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

Small states have more power than large states when one looks at the Senate. 40 million California's have only two Senators; Alabama has less than 5 million and has two senators. How is that fair?

This is supposed to be a republic, Not a shit eating democracy live with it bedwetter

 

[Rustic]

The first thing I want to know is the Popular Vote going to replace it. If yes, then do they for see any inequities that smaller states will have verses larger states?

No.

Lol
In a pure popular vote, Small states might as will not even vote… Because they would lose every single election. You ******* retard

No in a pure popular vote every persons vote will count equally, so you would have to be pretty STUPID not to vote, but with the EC some states votes count more than others.

This is the heart of the matter, with the EC, states are what matter. Get rid of the EC and states no longer matter, just numbers.

The problem is that our founding fathers wanted the states to matter

Bingo!!!!
The federal government pretty much disregards the 10th amendment now... That was supposed to account for the differences of urban and rural America.
Urban and rural America have absolutely zero in common, none of the same interests, none of the same needs, none of the same wants.

That is why this is supposed to be a republic and was only supposed to be at Republic, not a shit eating democracy

 

[Rustic]

The most practicable idea would be to divide the electoral votes evenly according to population, rather than according to congressional representation.

Not at all... That would be no different than a pure popular vote which the founders did not want Mob rule

 

[usmcstinger]

We are a Constitutional Republic Governed By The Rule of Law. We are not a Democracy. We would not have had a Constitution without the Electoral College.
In the interest of equality among the states the Electoral College was created. It prevents the larger states from controlling the vote. This is quite simple to understand. Unless you are a delusional sociopathic Socialist Democrat.

 

[Agit8r]

The most practicable idea would be to divide the electoral votes evenly according to population, rather than according to congressional representation.

Not at all... That would be no different than a pure popular vote which the founders did not want Mob rule

They also did not want us under foreign domination. But our present electoral system has given us precisely that.

 

[Rustic]

The most practicable idea would be to divide the electoral votes evenly according to population, rather than according to congressional representation.

Not at all... That would be no different than a pure popular vote which the founders did not want Mob rule

They also did not want us under foreign domination. But our present electoral system has given us precisely that.

Lol
Globalism is a progressive thing dumbass